의료자원 분배의 도덕성 논쟁-QALY에 대한 찬반 입장을 중심으로
QALY and the Ethical Debates over the Allocation of Health Care Resources
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this article are to examine the ethical issues surrounding the concept of quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and to determine what criteria should be used for distributing medical resources. The article examines the views of John Harris, Peter Singer, and Norman Daniels, and argues that the fairness of the process is more important than the legitimacy of the result in distributing medical resources. The argument is based on the belief that each individual life is important as well as the fact that results are often unpredictable. However, it is also noted that too much emphasis on the fairness of the process can result in a waste of medical resources.
Abstract
The purposes of this article are to examine the ethical issues surrounding the concept of quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and to determine what criteria should be used for distributing medical resources. The article examines the views of John Harris, Peter Singer, and Norman Daniels, and argues that the fairness of the process is more important than the legitimacy of the result in distributing medical resources. The argument is based on the belief that each individual life is important as well as the fact that results are often unpredictable. However, it is also noted that too much emphasis on the fairness of the process can result in a waste of medical resources.
참고문헌 (29)
- 신영석, "건강보험의 보험료 부과 체계의 형평성 향상 방안", 의료정책포럼, 9, pp.58~ (2011)
- Lisa S, "의료윤리", pp.368~ (2008), 인간사랑
- Alan Williams, "The value of QALYs", Health and Social Services Journal, pp.3~ (1985)
- Kuhse H, "Allocating Health Care Resources and the Problem of the Value of Life, First Published in Death and the Value of Life, In Unsanctifying Human Life (1st ed)", pp.272~273 (2002), Blackwell Publishers
- Avorn J, "Benefit and cost analysis in geriatric care-turning age discrimination into health policy", New England Journal of Medicine, 310, pp.1294~1301 (1984)
- Kuhse H, "Allocating Health Care Resources and the Problem of the Value of Life", 271~ (2002)
- Dollard J, "Personality and Psychotherapy", pp.2~ (1950), McGrawHill
- Sahakian WS, "윤리학", pp.67~ (2001)
- 김태길, "윤리학", pp.86~ (1980), 박영사
- Hospers J, "인간행위의 탐구", pp.71~72 (1999), 자작아카데미
- Moore GE, "Principia Ethica", pp.10~ (1956), Cambridge University Press
- Singer P, "Practical Ethics (2nd ed)", pp.90~ (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Singer P, "The Life You Can Save: Action Now to end World Poverty", pp.152~ (2009), Random House
- Singer P, "Practical Ethics", 21~ (1993)
- Rawls J, "공정으로서의 정의", pp.34~ (1988), 서광사
- Rawls J, "A Theory of Justice. Cambridge", pp.23~ (1999), The Belknap Perss of Harvard University Press
- Harris J, "Deciding Between Patients", 337~
- Macintyre S, "Modernising the NHS : prevention and the reduction of health inequalitics", Br Med J, 320, pp.1399~1400 (2000)
- Klein P, "The second phase of priority setting", Br Med J, pp.1000~1007 (1998)
- Harris J, "QALYfying the value of human life", Journal of Medical Ethics, 13, pp.120~ (1987)
- 93, "The Mysteries of Health Gain, In Health Care UH 1992", pp.1992, Hunter D
- 권복규, "생명 윤리와 법", pp.24~ (2005), 이화여자대학교출판부
- Kuhse H, "Allocating Health Care Resources and the Problem of the Value of Life", 266~ (2002)
- Glover J, "Causing Death and Saving Lives", pp.220~221 (1977), Penguin Books
- Singer P, "A report from Australia-which babies are too expensive to treat?", Bioethics, 1, pp.275~283 (1987)
- 문성학, "삶의 의미와 윤리", pp.177~ (2009), 형설출판사
- Daniels N, "Just health: meeting health needs fairly", 17~
- Nord E, "Qalys: some challenges", Value in Health, 12, pp.10~ (2009)
- 이일학, "의학연구에서 위험성 평가: 기관생명윤리심의위원회의 평가를 위해 고려할 사항들", 생명윤리정책연구, 2, pp.2~22 (2008)