의학적 의사결정 모델로써 공동의사결정의 이해
Shared Decision-Making as a Model of Medical Decision-Making
1
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Matters related to human life and death and medical healing are the concerns of patients, physicians, and other related persons, including family members of the patients. Existing medical decision-making models include paternalism and informed consent. However, these models have the limitation of being one-sided or unidirectional. Accordingly, shared decision-making is now emerging as a superior model of medical decision-making. In this model, physicians, who have medical knowledge, patients, and family members, who may have the best understanding of the patients’ life, jointly participate in making medical decisions. As a medical decision-making model, shared decision-making is often regarded as a process based on mutual respect and partnership between physicians and patients. A goal of medicine is to remove pain brought about by disease. In making medical decisions for individual patients, not only physicians, but also the patients themselves and their family members can play an important role. Family members can play such a role because of their familiarity with the patient and knowledge of his or her values. This is especially true in times of medical crisis when individual patients may have difficulties in making reasonable decisions. Thus, shared decision-making is an ideal method of decision-making, one in which patients, physicians, and family members work together to choose the best course of medical treatment for the patient.
Abstract
Matters related to human life and death and medical healing are the concerns of patients, physicians, and other related persons, including family members of the patients. Existing medical decision-making models include paternalism and informed consent. However, these models have the limitation of being one-sided or unidirectional. Accordingly, shared decision-making is now emerging as a superior model of medical decision-making. In this model, physicians, who have medical knowledge, patients, and family members, who may have the best understanding of the patients’ life, jointly participate in making medical decisions. As a medical decision-making model, shared decision-making is often regarded as a process based on mutual respect and partnership between physicians and patients. A goal of medicine is to remove pain brought about by disease. In making medical decisions for individual patients, not only physicians, but also the patients themselves and their family members can play an important role. Family members can play such a role because of their familiarity with the patient and knowledge of his or her values. This is especially true in times of medical crisis when individual patients may have difficulties in making reasonable decisions. Thus, shared decision-making is an ideal method of decision-making, one in which patients, physicians, and family members work together to choose the best course of medical treatment for the patient.
참고문헌 (21)
- 이병도, "의학적 의사결정 도구들에 대한 고찰: Bayesian analysisand ROC analysis", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 36(1), pp.1~5 (2006), 대한구강악안면방사선학회
- Edmund D Pellegrino, "A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice: Toward a Philosophy and Ethic of the Healing Professions", pp.120~121 (1981), Oxford University Press
- Frederick O Bonkovsky, "Contending Medical Decision Models", Theoretical Medicine, 22, pp.193~ (2001)
- Rem B Edwards, "Bio-ethics", pp.32~ (1988), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
- Tom L Beauchamp, "Principles of Biomedical Ethics", pp.57~112 (2001), Oxford University Press
- Emanuel EJ, "Four models of the phyician-patient relationship", Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, pp.2225~ (1992)
- Cathy Charles, "Shared decision-making in the Medical Encounter: What does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango)", Soc Sci Med, 44(5), pp.683~ (1997)
- Jan Marta, "Whose Consent is it anyway? A Poststructuralist Framing of the person in Medical Decision-Making", Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 19, pp.360~ (1998)
- Mark G Kuczewski, "Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics", pp.135~ (1997), Georgetown University Press
- Edmund D Pellegrino, "The Virtues in Medical Practice", pp.86~ (1993), Oxford University Press
- Frank C Richardson, "Virtue Ethics, Dialogue, and “Reverence”", American Behavioral Scientist, 47(4), pp.444~ (2003)
- 양정남, "사회복지 현장의 수퍼비젼 방식 연구", 동신대학교논문집, 16, pp.18~ (2006)
- Scott C Bauer, "Myth, Consensus, and Change", Executive Educator, pp.26~28 (1992)
- Marl L Clayman, "Shared Decision Making: Fertility and Pediatric Cancer, In Oncofertility: Fertility Preservation for Cancer Survivors", pp.152~ (2007), Springer
- Steven A Cole, "의학 면담: 관계 형성·환자의 문제 평가·환자의 문제 치료 기능적 접근", pp.21~ (2002), 학지사
- Kenneth E Rosenfeld, "End-of-Life Decision Making: A Qualitative Study of Elderly Individuals", J Gen Intern Med, 15, pp.622~ (2000)
- Paul Lauritzen, "Ethics and experience: The case of the curious response", Hastings Center Report, 26(1), pp.13~ (1996)
- 진교훈, "의학적 인간학: 의학철학의 기초", pp.44~ (2002), 서울대학교 출판부
- Martha O Loustaunau, "건강질병의료의 문화분석", pp.47~ (2003), 한울아카데미
- Engelhardt H Tristram, "The Family in Transition and in Authority: The Impact of Biotechnology, In The Family, Medical Decision-Making and Biotechnology", pp.35~ (2007), Springer
- Christof Schäfer, "Medical decision-making of the patient in the context of the family: results of a survey", Support Care, Cancer, 14, pp.956~ (2006)