생명의료윤리에서의‘자율성’에 대한 비판적 고찰
Critical Consideration of ‘Autonomy’ in Biomedical Ethics
1
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The principle of autonomy has been introduced in lots of bioethics references explaining Kant’s conception of autonomy. “Autonomy in bioethics” is different from “autonomy in Kant.”The former is almost the same as principle of freedom. I examine the meaning of autonomy through the review of Beauchamp and Childress’ analysis and Miller’s, which do not reach Kant’s conception. I also try to propose some practical suggestion after this examination. Autonomy is different from freedom in that autonomy should include moral reflection. The aspect of moral reflection in autonomy may reflect cultural and/or relational consideration beyond individualistic conception of autonomy. This may contribute to establish a new conception of autonomy. Even a new conception of autonomy is still different from Kant’s in that the principle of autonomy is one of principles whereas Kant’s autonomy is one to produce moral norms. Thus principle of autonomy in bioethics cannot be considered to be the supreme one to resolve bioethical issues. Autonomy may not be respected when respecting one autonomy does harm to others or violates the principle of justice. In this respect, autonomy as a value may conflict other values such as life or justice. Which value is preserved is still a difficult question when we are faced with conflicts of values.
Abstract
The principle of autonomy has been introduced in lots of bioethics references explaining Kant’s conception of autonomy. “Autonomy in bioethics” is different from “autonomy in Kant.”The former is almost the same as principle of freedom. I examine the meaning of autonomy through the review of Beauchamp and Childress’ analysis and Miller’s, which do not reach Kant’s conception. I also try to propose some practical suggestion after this examination. Autonomy is different from freedom in that autonomy should include moral reflection. The aspect of moral reflection in autonomy may reflect cultural and/or relational consideration beyond individualistic conception of autonomy. This may contribute to establish a new conception of autonomy. Even a new conception of autonomy is still different from Kant’s in that the principle of autonomy is one of principles whereas Kant’s autonomy is one to produce moral norms. Thus principle of autonomy in bioethics cannot be considered to be the supreme one to resolve bioethical issues. Autonomy may not be respected when respecting one autonomy does harm to others or violates the principle of justice. In this respect, autonomy as a value may conflict other values such as life or justice. Which value is preserved is still a difficult question when we are faced with conflicts of values.
참고문헌 (20)
- Arras JD, "Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Tragic View", Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 13 (1997)
- Baylis F, "A Relational Account of Public Health Ethics", Public Health Ethics, 1(3), pp.202~ (2008)
- Beauchamp TL, "Principles of Biomedical Ethics", pp.57~401 (2001)
- Burton K, "A Chronicle: Dax’s Case As It Happened, in Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine", pp.301~305 (2003), McGraw-Hill
- Dawson A, "The Future of Bioethics: Three Dogmas and a Cup of Hemlock", Bioethics, 24(5), pp.218~225 (2010)
- Dickert N, "What’s the Price of a Research Subject?: Approaches to Payment for Research Participation, in Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary", pp.179~183 (2003), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Hardwig J, "Is There a Duty to Die?, in Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine", pp.511~520 (2008), McGraw Hill
- Kristinsson S, "Autonomy and Informed Consent: A Mistaken Association?", Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10, pp.253~264 (2007)
- Mackenzie C, "Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspective on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Miller B, "Autonomy and the Refusal of Lifesaving Treatment: Four Cases, Four Senses of Autonomy", The Hastings Center Report, 11, pp.22~28 (1981)
- Moreno JD, "Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus", pp.61~ (1995), Oxford University Press
- Munson R, "Intervention and Reflection: Basic Issues in Medical Ethics", pp.694~ (2008), Thomson
- Sherwin S, "A Relational Approach to Autonomy in Health Care. Sherwin S and the Canadian Feminist Health Research Network, in The Politics of Woman’s Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy" (1998), Temple University Press
- Veatch R, "The Basics of Bioethics", pp.72~ (2003), Prentice Hall
- 최경석, "임상시험의 법과 윤리", pp.85~99 (2007), 이화여자대학교 생명의료법연구소
- 대한의사협회, "개원의를 위한 의료윤리사례집" (2006)
- 류지한, "윤리학 : 옳고 그름의 발견", pp.249~266 (2010), 울력
- "신상진 의원 등의“존엄사법안”(의안번호 1803730), 김세연 의원 등의“삶의 마지막 단계에서 자연스러운 죽음을 맞이할 권리에 관한 법률안” (의안번호 1805232)", ~
- 이상목, "생명의료윤리에 대한 비교문화적 접근: 의학적 의사결정을 중심으로", 한국의료윤리학회지, 10(1), pp.23~32 (2007), 한국의료윤리학회
- 최경석, "무작위 임상시험의 윤리적ㆍ법적 문제", 한국의료윤리학회지, 11(1), pp.45~62 (2008), 한국의료윤리학회