본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학생들의 공동의사결정(Shared Decision Making) 참여 선호도에 대한 인식 및 태도 조사:부산 소재 2개 대학을 중심으로

Korean College Students’ Attitudes and Preferences Toward Shared Decision-Making between Patients and Physicians

김성수|박병규|장철훈|이수현|한흥식
한국의료윤리학회 (The Korean Society For Medical Ethics)|2012.04|한국의료윤리학회지 (Korean Journal of Medical Ethics)|제15권 제1호|pp. 52-69|DOI 10.35301/ksme.2012.15.1.52

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

공동의사결정대학생들의 공동의사결정에 대한 태도질병의 종류에 따른 공동의사결정 참여 선호도shared decision makingcollege students’ attitudes of shared decision makingcollege students’ role preferences for involvement in treatment decision making
주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine Korean college students’ attitudes and preferences toward shared decision-making (SDM). Methods: Questionnaires were collected from 142 college students in Korea. Subjects were asked about four main items: (1) attitudes toward SDM; (2) experiences with SDM; (3) preferences for treatment decision-making for four diseases; (4) barriers to SDM. Results: It was found that 78% of the participants had never heard of SDM and 61% indicated that the doctor-patient relationship is paternalistic. The majority of subjects believed that the final treatment decision should be made by doctors and patients together. While 39% of subjects said that their doctors had asked them to participate in treatment decision-making, only 10% of subjects felt that their doctors actually wanted them to participate in SDM. The type of disease in question had no effect on the subjects’ preferences for treatment decisionmaking; all subjects expressed a preference for playing a collaborative role in the decisionmaking process. Furthermore, subjects believed that when patients and physicians disagree on treatment options, patient preferences should take precedence. Finally, subjects indicated that the main factors impeding SDM are (a) a lack of information about prognosis (28%), (b)beliefs about doctors’ sole authority for treatment decision (25%), (c) the lack of consultation time with doctors (19%), (d) the difficulties of understanding medical terms, and (e) the scarcity of available opportunities for participation in SDM. Conclusion: Although most subjects in this study were not familiar with SDM, they showed high preferences for it. Additionally, subjects did not feel that their doctors often used shared decision making. Physicians in Korea should make greater efforts to engage in SDM with their patients.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine Korean college students’ attitudes and preferences toward shared decision-making (SDM). Methods: Questionnaires were collected from 142 college students in Korea. Subjects were asked about four main items: (1) attitudes toward SDM; (2) experiences with SDM; (3) preferences for treatment decision-making for four diseases; (4) barriers to SDM. Results: It was found that 78% of the participants had never heard of SDM and 61% indicated that the doctor-patient relationship is paternalistic. The majority of subjects believed that the final treatment decision should be made by doctors and patients together. While 39% of subjects said that their doctors had asked them to participate in treatment decision-making, only 10% of subjects felt that their doctors actually wanted them to participate in SDM. The type of disease in question had no effect on the subjects’ preferences for treatment decisionmaking; all subjects expressed a preference for playing a collaborative role in the decisionmaking process. Furthermore, subjects believed that when patients and physicians disagree on treatment options, patient preferences should take precedence. Finally, subjects indicated that the main factors impeding SDM are (a) a lack of information about prognosis (28%), (b)beliefs about doctors’ sole authority for treatment decision (25%), (c) the lack of consultation time with doctors (19%), (d) the difficulties of understanding medical terms, and (e) the scarcity of available opportunities for participation in SDM. Conclusion: Although most subjects in this study were not familiar with SDM, they showed high preferences for it. Additionally, subjects did not feel that their doctors often used shared decision making. Physicians in Korea should make greater efforts to engage in SDM with their patients.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. Sullivan M, "The new subjective medicine : taking the patient's point of view on health care and health", Soc Sci Med, 56(7), pp.1595~1604 (2003)
  2. Whitney SN, "A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent", Ann Intern Med, 140(1), pp.54~59 (2004)
  3. "Canterbury v Spence, 464 F. 2d 772(DC Cir. 1972)" (1972)[URL]
  4. "President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry ,In Quality first: better health care for all Americans"[URL]
  5. "Joint principles of the patient centered medical home"[URL]
  6. Moulton B, "Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice", J Law Med Ethics, 38(1), pp.85~97 (2010)
  7. Institute of Medicine, "The Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, In Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century" (2001), National Academy Press
  8. Flynn KE, "A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making", Soc Sci Med, 63(5), pp.1158~1169 (2006)
  9. Rüdell K, "Preferences for involvement in medical decision making : comparing British and German views", Psychol Health Med, 11(2), pp.171~181 (2006)
  10. Charles C, "Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: The case of shared treatment decision-making", Patient Educ Couns, 63(3), pp.262~267 (2006)
  11. Peek ME, "Are there racial differences in patients' shared decision-making preferences and behaviors among patients with diabetes?", Med Decis Making, 31(3), pp.422~431 (2011)
  12. Beaver K, "Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer", Health Expect, 8(2), pp.103~113 (2005)
  13. Hochlehnert A, "A computer-based information-tool for chronic pain patients: computerized information to support the process of shared decision-making", Patient Educ Couns, 61(1), pp.92~98 (2006)
  14. Keating NL, "Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement?", J Clin Oncol, 20(6), pp.1473~1479 (2002)
  15. Schattner A, "Information and shared decision-making are top patients' priorities", priorities. BMC Health Serv Res, 6, pp.21~ (2006)
  16. Mead N, "Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature", Patient Educ Couns, 48(1), pp.51~61 (2002)
  17. Roter DL, "Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis", Med Care, 36(8), pp.1138~1161 (1998)
  18. Wahl C, "Concordance, compliance and adherence in healthcare: closing gaps and improving outcomes", Healthc Q, 8(1), pp.65~70 (2005)
  19. Goldstein MK, "Developing and testing a multimedia presentation of a health-state description", Med Decis Making, 14(4), pp.336~344 (1994)
  20. Stewart MA, "Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes : a review", CMAJ, 152(9), pp.1423~1433 (1995)
  21. Stewart M, "Evidence on patient-doctor communication", Cancer Prev Control, 3(1), pp.25~30 (1999)
  22. Mead N, "Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature", Soc Sci Med, 51(7), pp.1087~1110 (2000)
  23. 서원식, "의사와 환자 간 공유된 진료의사결정이 환자만족도에 미치는 영향", 예방의학회지, 43(1), pp.26~34 (2010), 대한예방의학회
  24. 김학선, "노인 암환자의 공유의사결정의 양상", 박사, pp.2009
  25. 이상목, "암환자의 의학적 의사결정과정", 한국의료윤리학회지, 12(1), pp.1~14 (2009), 한국의료윤리학회
  26. 백선경, "항암화학요법을 받는 환자들의 병에 대한 인지 정도가 의사결정 갈등과 삶의 질 변화에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.2009
  27. 김명숙, "의사-환자 간 공유된 의사결정이 류마티스 질환자의 진료만족도에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2010
  28. 민현준, "군의료기관의 공유의사결정과 환자만족도", 박사, pp.2010
  29. 서원식, "의사와 환자 간 공유된 진료의사결정이 환자만족도에 미치는 영향", 예방의학회지, 43(1), pp.26~34 (2010), 대한예방의학회
  30. Charles C, "Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two or tango)", Soc Sci Med, 44(5), pp.681~692 (1997)
  31. Charles C, "Decision-making in the physicianpatient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model", Soc Sci Med, 49(5), pp.651~661 (1999)
  32. Towle A, "Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making", BMJ, 319(7212), pp.766~771 (1999)
  33. Whitney SN, "A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent", Ann Intern Med, 140(1), pp.54~59 (2004)
  34. Charles C, "Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two or tango)", Soc Sci Med, 44(5), pp.681~692 (1997)
  35. Charles C, "Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model", Soc Sci Med, 49(5), pp.651~661 (1999)
  36. Towle A, "Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making", BMJ, 319(7212), pp.766~771 (1999)
  37. Charles C, "What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?", BMJ, 319(7212), pp.780~782 (1999)
  38. Frosch DL, "Shared decision making in clinical medicine : past research and future directions", Am J Prev Med, 17(4), pp.285~294 (1999)
  39. Jordan JL, "Defining shared decision making and concordance: are they one and the same?", Postgrad Med J, 78(921), pp.383~384 (2002)
  40. Moulton B, "Aligning ethics with medical decision-making : the quest for informed patient choice", J Law Med Ethics, 38(1), pp.85~97 (2010)
  41. Elwyn G, "Towards a feasible model for shared decision making : focus group study with general practice registrars", BMJ, 319(7212), pp.753~756 (1999)
  42. Elwyn G, "Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement", Qual Saf Health Care, 12(2), pp.93~99 (2003)
  43. Elwyn G, "The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks", Health Expect, 8(1), pp.34~42 (2005)
  44. Price-Haywood EG, "Cancer risk communication with low health literacy patients: a continuing medical education program", J Gen Intern Med, 25(2), pp.S126~S129 (2010)
  45. Ommen O, "The relationship between social support, shared decision-making and patient's trust in doctors: a cross-sectional survey of 2,197 inpatients using the Cologne Patient Questionnaire", Int J Public Health, 56(3), pp.319~327 (2011)
  46. 서원식, "의사와 환자 간 공유된 진료의사결정이 환자만족도에 미치는 영향", 예방의학회지, 43(1), pp.26~34 (2010), 대한예방의학회
  47. Blundell N, "Elective surgical referral guidelines: background educational material or essential shared decision making tool? A survey of GPs' in England", BMC Fam Pract, 12, pp.92~100 (2011)
  48. Deber RB, "What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?", Arch Intern Med, 156(13), pp.1414~1420 (1996)
  49. Benbassat J, "Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys", Behav Med, 24(2), pp.81~88 (1998)
  50. Sekimoto M, "Patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan", BMC Fam Pract, 5, pp.1~10 (2004)
  51. Elwyn G, "Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars", BMJ, 319(7212), pp.753~756 (1999)
  52. Peek ME, "Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making among African-Americans with diabetes", J Gen Intern Med 2009 ;, 24(10), pp.1135~1139 (2009)
  53. Deber RB, "What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?", Arch Intern Med, 156(13), pp.1414~1420 (1996)
  54. Benbassat J, "Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys", Behav Med, 24(2), pp.81~88 (1998)
  55. Sekimoto M, "Patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan", BMC Fam Pract, 5, pp.1~10 (2004)
  56. Deber RB, "What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?", Arch Intern Med, 156(13), pp.1414~1420 (1996)
  57. Benbassat J, "Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys", Behav Med, 24(2), pp.81~88 (1998)
  58. Sekimoto M, "Patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan", BMC Fam Pract, 5, pp.1~10 (2004)
  59. Elwyn G, "Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars", BMJ, 319(7212), pp.753~756 (1999)
  60. Elwyn G, "Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement", Qual Saf Health Care, 12(2), pp.93~99 (2003)
  61. Price-Haywood EG, "Cancer risk communication with low health literacy patients: a continuing medical education program", J Gen Intern Med, 25(2), pp.S126~S129 (2010)
  62. Ommen O, "The relationship between social support, shared decision-making and patient's trust in doctors: a cross-sectional survey of 2,197 inpatients using the Cologne Patient Questionnaire", Int J Public Health, 56(3), pp.319~327 (2011)
  63. 안경애, "의료과오 감소를 위한 환자의 자기보호행동 및 의사결정 참여", 보건행정학회지, 16(3), pp.70~85 (2006), 한국보건행정학회
  64. Sekimoto M, "Patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan", BMC Fam Pract, 5, pp.1~10 (2004)
  65. Blanchard CG, "and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients", Soc Sci Med, 27(11), pp.1139~1145 (1988)
  66. Degner LF, "Decision making during serious illness: what role do patient really want tp play?", J Clin Epidemiol, 45(9), pp.941~950 (1992)
  67. Ende J, "Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients", J Gen Intern Med, 4(1), pp.23~30 (1989)
  68. Sekimoto M, "Patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan", BMC Fam Pract, 5, pp.1~10 (2004)
  69. Moulton B, "Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice", J Law Med Ethics, 38(1), pp.85~97 (2010)
  70. 서원식, "의사와 환자 간 공유된 진료의사결정이 환자만족도에 미치는 영향", 예방의학회지, 43(1), pp.26~34 (2010), 대한예방의학회

관련 논문AI추천

의사와 환자 간 공유된 진료의사결정이 환자만족도에 미치는 영향서원식, 이채경대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2010 · 제43권 제1호환자와 의사의 환자 중심 태도 차이김민정한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2013 · 제25권 제2호의학적 의사결정에 관한 우리나라 성인의 인식 조사권복규한국의료윤리학회 · 한국의료윤리학회지2015 · 제18권 제3호암환자의 의학적 의사결정과정김성연, 이상목, 이형식한국의료윤리학회 · 한국의료윤리학회지2009 · 제12권 제1호공유의사결정 중심 의료의 개념 및 발전에 관한 고찰김성재, 우종인, 이정희, 이준희, 장은영, 최수희, 최영민, 황재욱한국정신병리-진단분류학회 · 정신병리학2025 · 제29권 제2호의학적 의사결정 모델로써 공동의사결정의 이해김진경한국의료윤리학회 · 한국의료윤리학회지2008 · 제11권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

의료자원 분배의 도덕성 논쟁-QALY에 대한 찬반 입장을 중심으로정창록pp. 1-23심장호흡사 기준에 의한 장기구득에 관한 비판적 고찰:피츠버그 프로토콜에 의한 첫 번째 사례 분석김장한pp. 24-33심폐소생술 금지(Do-Not-Resuscitate)를 결정한 암환자 가족의 경험에 관한 현상학적 연구이명선, 옥정휘pp. 34-51의료윤리수업 소그룹활동에 대한 동료평가의 경험정유석pp. 70-771학년과 4학년 간호대학생 간의 생명의료윤리 가치관에 대한 비교이은주, 김은희pp. 78-95
원문 보기