아크라시아 사례들을 통해 본 자율성과 감정의 문제:타폴레의 관심-기반 이론을 중심으로
Respect for Autonomy and Its Emotional Aspects in Cases of Akrasia: Tappolet’s Care-based Account of Autonomy
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Over the last few decades ‘respect for autonomy’ has emerged as one of the most important ethical principles governing modern medicine. This is due at least in part to the influence of Beauchamp and Childress’s Principles of Biomedical Ethics. However, there seem to be two major problems with this principle of respect for autonomy: one is that it has become something of a dogma; the other is that the concept of autonomy is unclear. In many areas of life, including that of medical care, it is difficult to discern which agents are truly autonomous, which decisions (or acts) are truly autonomous and, accordingly, which of these are to be respected. It seems that a better understanding of autonomy is very much needed. This article responds to that need by providing a careful examination of both rationalist and care-based conceptions of autonomy. It argues that rationalist conceptions of autonomy cannot account for cases of akrasia, and that care-based conceptions of autonomy help to illuminate the intimate relationship between autonomy and the emotions.
Abstract
Over the last few decades ‘respect for autonomy’ has emerged as one of the most important ethical principles governing modern medicine. This is due at least in part to the influence of Beauchamp and Childress’s Principles of Biomedical Ethics. However, there seem to be two major problems with this principle of respect for autonomy: one is that it has become something of a dogma; the other is that the concept of autonomy is unclear. In many areas of life, including that of medical care, it is difficult to discern which agents are truly autonomous, which decisions (or acts) are truly autonomous and, accordingly, which of these are to be respected. It seems that a better understanding of autonomy is very much needed. This article responds to that need by providing a careful examination of both rationalist and care-based conceptions of autonomy. It argues that rationalist conceptions of autonomy cannot account for cases of akrasia, and that care-based conceptions of autonomy help to illuminate the intimate relationship between autonomy and the emotions.
참고문헌 (20)
- Beauchampt TL, "Principles of Biomedical Ethics" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Dawson A, "The future of bioethics: three dogmas and a cup of hemlock", Bioethics, 23(5), pp.218~225 (2010)
- McKnight CJ, "Autonomy and the akratic patient", J Med Ethics, 19(4), pp.206~ (1993)
- Davidson D, "Essays on Actions and Events", pp.29~ (1980), Oxford University Press
- Brody B, "Life and Death Decision Making", pp.100~102 (1988), Oxford University Press
- Watson G, "Autonomy and the emotions", European J Analytic Philosophy, 2(2), pp.48~ (2006)
- Wolf S., "The Real Self View, In Perspective on Moral Responsibility", pp.151~170 (1993), Cornell University Press
- Shoemaker D, "Caring, identification, and agency", Ethics, 114(1), pp.94~ (2003)
- Arpaly N, "Praise, blame and the whole self", Philosophical Studies, 93(2), pp.163~ (1999)
- Cuypers SE, "Autonomy beyond voluntarism: in defense of hierarchy", Canadian J Philosophy, 30(2), pp.225~256 (2000)
- Frankfurt H, "Autonomy, Necessity, and Love. Necessity, Volition, and Love", pp.129~141 (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Robinson J., "Deeper than Reason", pp.8~ (2005), Oxford University Press
- Damasio A, "Decartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain" (1994), GP Putnam
- Nussbaum M, "Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature", pp.78~79 (1990), Oxford University Press
- Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics", pp.1113a10~1139b5 (1985), Hackett Publishing Company
- Plato, "Protagoras, In Plato: Complete Works", pp.352d5~352e2 (1997), Hackett
- Cho S, "On akrasia in decision making: Socrates' hedonism in Protagoras", Biomed Law Ethics, 6(2), pp.29~50 (2012)
- Nussbaum M, "The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Jaggar A, "Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology", Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary J Philosophy, 32(2), pp.157~176 (1989)
- Ledoux J., "The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions", pp.216~223 (1994), Oxford University Press