본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

태국 불교 승려계급이 갖는 사회적 의미

The social significance of the Thai Buddhist monk level

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

Secular power and Buddhist ideology are conceptually parallel, but in reality, the royal family was the final decision power with higher powers. In Southeast Asia, the so-called Buddhism's Darma-rāja and Hindu's Deva-rāja seem to stably represent the religious Darma-rāja legitimacy and real rulership, but in India, religious authority is in fact superior to the kingship. However, the structure was reversed in Southeast Asia, which embraced Buddhism as an alternative Hindu religion, while accepting India's world-view. In Southeast Asia, where religious orthodoxy was obtained from Buddhism rather than Hinduism, it would never be said that Brahman or Hinduism inherited the status of Ksatriyas. At the same time, the rulers of Southeast Asia, who came to the forefront of Buddhism, structured Buddhism by re-applying it to the Buddhism, as the ruling class itself entered the Buddhism itself. If the four class or level had been set up with India, then Ksatriya would never be able to go against the Brahman level. However, previous research in Tambia has led Ksatriyas to become the main authority and to re-grant the power of the private class with the religious authority of Buddhism. In this situation, the reverence for the Brahman class depends entirely on the will of Ksatriya. Paradoxically, if the Ksatriya level exercised its treatment of the Brahman class at their will, the Ksatriya level should give up its religious authority. However, since the religious center of authority was Buddhism, not Hinduism, for the Ksatriyas level in Southeast Asia, Buddhism actually replaced the Brahman level. If the king of Southeast Asia adopts Buddhism rather than Hinduism as the central religious ideology, Ksatriyas must keep the religion of the Brahman level at their will, but do not have to put religion at a high rank, and is the more popular Buddhism. Even new religious traditions can be put in their place. This decision resulted in the acceptance of both religions from the Indian mother, who originally existed in the same time and space. The Ksatriyas level in Southeast Asia were able to successfully transfer two “philosophical and religious foundations” of India to the kingship center, putting Buddhist order on Hindu. Their thoughts are well revealed by structuring the ranks of the Sangha. In addition, the fact that this structure fits the above hypothesis can be confirmed by the fact that Thailand is moving the secular class structure as it is.

Abstract

Secular power and Buddhist ideology are conceptually parallel, but in reality, the royal family was the final decision power with higher powers. In Southeast Asia, the so-called Buddhism's Darma-rāja and Hindu's Deva-rāja seem to stably represent the religious Darma-rāja legitimacy and real rulership, but in India, religious authority is in fact superior to the kingship. However, the structure was reversed in Southeast Asia, which embraced Buddhism as an alternative Hindu religion, while accepting India's world-view. In Southeast Asia, where religious orthodoxy was obtained from Buddhism rather than Hinduism, it would never be said that Brahman or Hinduism inherited the status of Ksatriyas. At the same time, the rulers of Southeast Asia, who came to the forefront of Buddhism, structured Buddhism by re-applying it to the Buddhism, as the ruling class itself entered the Buddhism itself. If the four class or level had been set up with India, then Ksatriya would never be able to go against the Brahman level. However, previous research in Tambia has led Ksatriyas to become the main authority and to re-grant the power of the private class with the religious authority of Buddhism. In this situation, the reverence for the Brahman class depends entirely on the will of Ksatriya. Paradoxically, if the Ksatriya level exercised its treatment of the Brahman class at their will, the Ksatriya level should give up its religious authority. However, since the religious center of authority was Buddhism, not Hinduism, for the Ksatriyas level in Southeast Asia, Buddhism actually replaced the Brahman level. If the king of Southeast Asia adopts Buddhism rather than Hinduism as the central religious ideology, Ksatriyas must keep the religion of the Brahman level at their will, but do not have to put religion at a high rank, and is the more popular Buddhism. Even new religious traditions can be put in their place. This decision resulted in the acceptance of both religions from the Indian mother, who originally existed in the same time and space. The Ksatriyas level in Southeast Asia were able to successfully transfer two “philosophical and religious foundations” of India to the kingship center, putting Buddhist order on Hindu. Their thoughts are well revealed by structuring the ranks of the Sangha. In addition, the fact that this structure fits the above hypothesis can be confirmed by the fact that Thailand is moving the secular class structure as it is.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김홍구, "태국 승가법과 국가권력", 동양문화연구, 20, pp.233~261 (2015), 동양문화연구원[DOI]
  2. 김홍구, "태국불교의 역사와 현황", 불교평론, 69 (2017), 만해사상실천선양회
  3. "태국승왕 임명, 무엇이 문제인가?" (2017)[URL]
  4. "승가교육"[URL]
  5. 박경은, "타이 경어체계에 반영된 메타포의 문화적 해석 -왕실용어에 반영된 상하향 지향은유를 중심으로", 한국태국학회논총, 26(2), pp.1~38 (2020), 한국태국학회[DOI]
  6. "법보신문"[URL]
  7. 양혜원, "15세기 승과(僧科) 연구", 한국사상사학, (62), pp.59~88 (2019), 한국사상사학회[DOI]
  8. 이자랑, "한국불교의 계맥과 계단 개설", 불교평론, 20 (2018)
  9. ), "2017", ~
  10. 정병삼, "한국불교사" (2020), 푸른역사
  11. 홍석준, "동남아시아 불교의 내셔널리즘 (민족주의) 역사와 전개", 불교평론, 63 (2015), 만해사상실천선양회
  12. 황순일, "테라와다불교의 동남아시아 전파" (2018), 가산불교문화연구원
  13. Bickner, Robert J., "Three Worlds According to King Ruang: Thai Buddhist Cosmology, tr. by Frank E. Reynolds and Mani B. Reynolds", The Journal of the Internationa Association of Buddhist Studies, 5(2) (1982), University of Wisconsin
  14. John P., "Monks and Hierarchy in Northern Thailand", JSS (Journal of Siam Society) (1976)
  15. Harris, Ian, "Buddhist Sangha Groupings in Cambodia", Buddhistt Studies Review, 18(1) (2001)
  16. Harris, Ian, "Buddhism, Power and Political Order" (2007), Routledge
  17. Swearer, Donald K., "The Buddhist World of Southeast Asia" (2010), Silkworm Books
  18. Tambiah, S. J., "World Conqueror and World Renouncer" (1976), Cambridge Univ. Press
  19. Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja, "The Buddhist saint of the forest and the cult of amulets" (1984), Cambridge Univ. Press
  20. "พจนานุกรมพุทธศาสตร “폿차나누끄롬풋삿” (불교문헌사전)", ~ (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)