본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학생들의 스토킹 피해에 있어 성별과 위험한 생활 행태(Risky Lifestyle)의 영향력연구

A study of effect of gender and risky lifestyle on stalking victimization among college students

박미랑
한국경찰연구학회 (Korean Police Studies Association)|2010.03|한국경찰연구 (Korean Police Studies Review)|제9권 제1호|pp. 27-54

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

대학생college studentsgender difference흡연smoking남성스토킹 피해위험한 생활행태stalking victimizationrisky lifestyle

초록

스토킹 관련 법안을 통과시켜 스토킹 피해자들을 보호하고 있는 미국과 달리, 한국내에서 최근 미디어를 통해 연예인의 스토킹 피해사례가 보도되면서 스토킹에 대한 대중의 인식이 변화하고 있지만 학자들에 의해 이루어지는 스토킹 피해자의 심리적 육체적 폐해 및 스토킹 행위의 위험성에 관한연구는 여전히 미흡하다. 본 연구의 목적은 인간관계의 폭이 본격적으로 넓어지기 시작하는 대학생들이 겪고 있는 스토킹 피해에 관한 현황을 보고하고, 스토킹의 피해를 설명할 수 있는 요인을 범죄학적 이론을 통하여 살펴보는 것이다. 더욱 구체적으로, 연구는 스토킹 피해에 있어서 성별차이를 조사하고 일상생활 이론, 자아조절이론, 그리고 사회학습이론의 폭력의 학습과 관련한 폭력의 세대전승이론을 이용하여 스토킹 피해를 설명하려한다. 이러한 가설을 검증하기 위하여 미국 NVAWS 의 스토킹 측정방법인 갈등책략 척도(Conflict Tactics Scale-2: CTS-2)를 수정하여 수도권 대학교에 재학 중인 1390명의 대학생들을 대상으로 조사하였다. 본 연구에 사용된 종속변수는 스토킹 피해이고, 가정내 폭력의 학습(아동학대, 아버지 폭력의 목격, 훈육의 형태로 폭력의 경험), 자아조절, 위험한 생활패턴 (Risky Lifestyle)이 주요 독립변인으로 사용되었다. 결과에 따르면, 여성에 비해 남학생이 스토킹 피해를 보고한 건수가 더욱 많았고 위험한 생활패턴의 한 부분으로서 흡연습관을 가진 학생이 비흡연학생에 비해 스토킹 피해를 입을 가능성이 높다. 가정내 폭력의 목격과 경험, 자아조절능력은 스토킹 피해에 영향을 주지 않는 것으로 드러났다. 이러한 결과에 기반하여 본문에서 연구의 함의와 정책적 함의를 더욱 논의하도록 한다.

Abstract

Unlike western societies which have passed the anti-stalking law to protect a victim of stalking, there is little recognition on stalking behavior and victimization among the public in Korea. As several cases of stalking victimization against celebrities were revealed, fortunately, the recognition on stalking victimization has been changed. That is, the public became to know about the risk and seriousness of physical and psychological victimization of stalking. However, it lacks empirical research on stalking behavior or stalking victimization. A purpose of this study is to show the current status of stalking victimization among college students who is on the stage to broaden their human relationship, and to find the criminological factors which can explain the stalking victimization. More specifically, this study will explore the gender difference on the stalking victimization, and test the criminological theories such as routine activity theory, self-control theory, intergenerational transmission theory as a part of social learning theory to explain the stalking victimization. A total 1390 college students participated on the survey, and a convenienced sampling method was selected. The dependent variable, stalking victimization, was measured using the Revised Conflict Tactic Scale-2. The independent variables used in the study were an experience of violence in the family (witness of father's violence against mother, experience of child abuse, experience of violence on the form of discipline), self-control, risky lifestyle(drinking behavior, smoking behavior, and risky sexual behavior). According to the result, unlike initial expectation, male students were more likely to be victimized than female student. Also, the students who smokes tobacco are more likely to be a victim of stalking than others. The factor of self-control, learning process of violence in the family were not significant to predict the victimization of stalking. Implication of research and policy will be discussed in the paper.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 스토킹 피해실태와 입법쟁점에 관한 연구, "한국형사정책연구원", ~ (2002)
  2. Akers, R. L., "Self-control as a general theory of crime", Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7(2), pp.201~211 (1991)
  3. Akers, R. L., "Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (5th ed.)" (2009), Oxford University Press
  4. Avakame, E. F., "Intergenerational transmission of violence, self‐control, and conjugal violence: A comparative analysis of physical violence and psychological aggression", Violence and Victims, 13(3), pp.301~316 (1998)
  5. Bjerregaard, B., "An empirical study of stalking victimization", Violence and Victims, 15, pp.389~406 (2000)
  6. Coleman, F.L., "Stalking behavior and the cycle of domestic violence", Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, pp.420~432 (1997)
  7. Dietz, N. A., "Women who are stalked: questioning the fear standard", Violence Against Women, 13, pp.750~776 (2007)
  8. Fisher, B. S., "Being pursued: stalking victimization in a national study of college women", Criminology & Public Policy, 1, pp.257~308 (2002)
  9. Gottfredson, M. R., "A general theory of crime" (1990), Stanford University Press
  10. Gover, A. R., "The relationship between violence in the family of origin and dating violence among college students", Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(525), pp.1667~1693 (2009)
  11. Grasmick, H. G., "Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime", Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, pp.5~29 (1993)
  12. Haugaard, J. L., "Stalking and other forms of intrusive contact in adolescent and young‐adult relationships", University of Missouri‐Kansas City Law Review, 69, pp.227~238 (2001)
  13. Higgins, G. E., "Sex and self‐control theory: the measures and causal model may be different", Youth & Society, 37, pp.479~503 (2006)
  14. Hirschi, T., "Self-control and crime, Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications" (2004), Guilford Press
  15. Holtfreter, K., "Routine activities, low self-control, and fraud victimization", Criminology, 46, pp.189~220 (2008)
  16. LaGrange, T. C., "Low self-control and opportunity: testing the general theory of crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency", Criminology, 37, pp.41~72 (1999)
  17. Lauritsen, J. L., "Understanding the link between victimization and offending: new reflections on an old idea", Crime Prevention Studies, 22, pp.55~75 (2007)
  18. Lauritsen, J. L., "The link between offending and victimization among adolescents", Criminology, 29, pp.265~292 (1991)
  19. Lauritsen, J. L., "Conventional and delinquent activities: implications for the prevention of violent victimization among adolescents", Violence and Victims, 7, pp.91~108 (1992)
  20. Leiter, R. A., "National survey of state laws, 5th ed" (2005), Thomson Gale Publishers
  21. Logan, T. K., "Stalking as a variant of intimate violence: implications from a young adult sample", Violence and Victims, 15, pp.91~111 (2000)
  22. Marshall, L. L., "Family of origin violence and courtship abuse", Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, pp.414~418 (1988)
  23. McCreedy, K., "Sex related offenses and fear of crime on campus", Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 12, pp.69~80 (1996)
  24. Mustaine, E. E., "A routine activity theory explanation for women’s stalking victimizations", Violence Against Women, 5, pp.43~62 (1999)
  25. Nakhaie, M. R., "Self-control and social control: An examination of gender, ethnicity, class and delinquency", Canadian Journal of Sociology, 25, pp.35~59 (2000)
  26. National Institute of Justice, "Domestic violence, stalking, and anti-stalking legislation" (1996), Author
  27. [URL]
  28. Nobles, M. R., "Career dimensions of stalking victimization and perpetration", Justice Quarterly, 26 (2009)
  29. Pathè, M., "The impact of stalkers on their victims", British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, pp.12~17 (1997)
  30. Romans, J. S. C., "Stalking and related behaviors experienced by counseling center staff members from current or former clients", Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, pp.595~599 (1996)
  31. "Senate judiciary Committee (1992, September 29), Hearing on S. 2911 Antistalking Legislation", ~
  32. Sellers, C. S., "Self-control and intimate violence: an examination of the scope and specification of the general theory of crime", Criminology, 37(2), pp.375~404 (1999)
  33. Sellers, C., "Violent behavior in college student dating relationships: implications for campus service providers", Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 12, pp.1~27 (1996)
  34. Schreck, C. J., "Criminal victimization and low self-control: an extension and test of a general theory of crime", Justice Quarterly, 16, pp.633~654 (1999)
  35. Schreck, C. J., "A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimization", Justice Quarterly, 19, pp.159~180 (2002)
  36. Schreck, C. J., "Self-control, victimization, and their influence on risky lifestyles: a longitudinal analysis using panel data", Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, pp.319~340 (2006)
  37. Sheridan, L., "Perceptions and prevalence of stalking in a male sample", Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, pp.289~310 (2002)
  38. Straus, M. A., "The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data", Journal of Family Issues, 17, pp.283~316 (1996)
  39. Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, National Institute of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Tjaden, P.", Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, ~, pp.Special Report No. NCJ 1669592 (1998)
  40. Turner, M. G., "The stability of self-control", Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(6), pp.457~471 (2002)
  41. Widom, C. S., "Child abuse, neglect, and violent criminal behavior", Criminology, 27, pp.251~271 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

디지털 시대의 스토킹: 사이버 생활양식 - 일상활동이론의 적용을 중심으로 -구지수, 김은빈, 페라레쏘 리카르도한국피해자학회 · 피해자학연구2024 · 제32권 제3호스토킹상황에서 신체폭력 발생인식에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 관한 경험적 연구김은영한국치안행정학회 · 한국치안행정논집2017 · 제14권 제2호사이버스토킹의 설명요인에 관한 연구신지민, 이성식, 임수경, 임형연한국형사정책학회 · 형사정책2020 · 제32권 제2호고등학생과 대학생의 가정폭력 피해와 데이트 폭력간의 관계에 대한 성의 조절효과서경현한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2004 · 제9권 제1호성별에 따른 청소년 범죄피해 원인 연구 : 자기통제이론, 일상활동이론을 중심으로유영재, 임하늘, 최재용한국경찰학회 · 한국경찰학회보2015 · 제17권 제3호대학생의 사이버범죄피해가 가해에 미치는 영향에서 일반긴장이론의 검증과 그 성별차이이성식, 이정환한국청소년정책연구원 · 한국청소년연구2014 · 제25권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

「경비업법」개정의 주요 쟁점과 개정방안김태민, 박동균pp. 3-26환경설계를 통한 범죄예방(CPTED)의 효과에 관한 연구 -대구주민의 주거환경에 대한 인식이 범죄피해 및 범죄두려움에 미치는 영향을 중심으로-박영주pp. 55-82연쇄살인사건수사에 있어서 공간적 프로파일링에 대한 연구-연쇄살인범 유영철, 정남규, 강호순사건을 중심으로박형식pp. 83-110경찰 직무만족도 선행연구의 고찰과 새로운 결정요인을 포함한 연구모델의 제안윤우석pp. 111-138테러방지법안에 대한 주요논점 및 보완적 고찰이만종pp. 139-162
원문 보기