본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독립적 특별수사기구의 도입방안에 관한 연구 -‘고위공직자비리수사처’ 법안들을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Introduction of the Independent Investigation Office against the High-ranking Officials’Crimes

0

조회

0

다운로드

23

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article deals with the proposal for the bill of 『the Independent Investigation Office against the High-ranking Officials’ Crimes』 in 2010by People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy(PSPD), and with the 5bills introduced by the members of the 18th Korean National Assembly. This proposal for the bill was first introduced in 1996, again in 2002,and yet again in 2010, followed by many bills, but it only failed to pass. Now it is already brought up again the new 19th National Assembly. The Independent Investigation Office was, at first, designed against the corruption of high-ranking public official (Anti-Corruption Model). But the situation in Korea has made it as a new choice for the control the power abuse of the Korean Prosecutor’s Office (Checks-and-Balances Model). Its focus has been gradually shifted from the Anti-Corruption Model to the Checks-and-Balances Model, because the Prosecution in Korea is being charged with the uncontrolled power and the political partiality. Naturally the Korean Prosecutors’ Office repulses another investigating organization, because it is mainly based on the mistrust of the Prosecutors’Office and a new investigation office could drastically reduce its power. In this article, I have scrutinized the proposal and bills and compare them from the viewpoint of the Checks-and-Balances Model. And thereby I suggest, as a conclusion, that the introduction of “the Independent Investigation Office” should enable the prosecution to be more independent from political influences and to be the effective remedy against the mistrust of the criminal justice system.

Abstract

This article deals with the proposal for the bill of 『the Independent Investigation Office against the High-ranking Officials’ Crimes』 in 2010by People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy(PSPD), and with the 5bills introduced by the members of the 18th Korean National Assembly. This proposal for the bill was first introduced in 1996, again in 2002,and yet again in 2010, followed by many bills, but it only failed to pass. Now it is already brought up again the new 19th National Assembly. The Independent Investigation Office was, at first, designed against the corruption of high-ranking public official (Anti-Corruption Model). But the situation in Korea has made it as a new choice for the control the power abuse of the Korean Prosecutor’s Office (Checks-and-Balances Model). Its focus has been gradually shifted from the Anti-Corruption Model to the Checks-and-Balances Model, because the Prosecution in Korea is being charged with the uncontrolled power and the political partiality. Naturally the Korean Prosecutors’ Office repulses another investigating organization, because it is mainly based on the mistrust of the Prosecutors’Office and a new investigation office could drastically reduce its power. In this article, I have scrutinized the proposal and bills and compare them from the viewpoint of the Checks-and-Balances Model. And thereby I suggest, as a conclusion, that the introduction of “the Independent Investigation Office” should enable the prosecution to be more independent from political influences and to be the effective remedy against the mistrust of the criminal justice system.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 김인회, "견제와 분산을 위한 검찰개혁과제 재검토", 민주법학, (43), pp.365~417 (2010), 민주주의법학연구회
  2. 김진환, "사법개혁의 방향", 저스티스, 통권 : 118, pp.57~88 (2010), 한국법학원
  3. 서보학, "검찰의 현주소와 법치주의의 위기", 법과사회, (39), pp.83~109 (2010), 법과사회이론학회
  4. 서울시립대학교 반부패행정시스템연구소, "부패방지정책의 국제적 논의동향 및대응방안 연구" (2002), 부패방지위원회
  5. 신동운, "과거청산과 한국의 검찰의 장래", 동아법학, pp.377~399 (1996), 동아대학교 법학연구소
  6. 연성진, "부패사범 통제체계의 실효성 제고방안" (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  7. 윤동호, "고위공직자비리수사처 신설의 정당성과 필요성", 형사정책연구, 22(1), pp.1~20 (2011), 한국형사정책연구원
  8. 윤영철, "검찰개혁과 독립된 특별수사기관의 신설에 관한 소고", 홍익법학, 13(1), pp.49~73 (2012), 법학연구소
  9. 윤태범, "권력형 부패에 대한 효과적 대응을 위한 제도적 개선방안: 고위공직자비리조사처 설치를 중심으로", 여의도연구소 주최 토론회 자료집, pp.13~36 (2010), 여의도연구소
  10. 이관희, "부패방지위원회의 발전방향", 헌법학연구, 10(4), pp.187~224 (2004), 한국헌법학회
  11. 이창호, "검찰개혁의 방향과 과제", 민주법학, (24), pp.427~450 (2003), 민주주의법학연구회
  12. 조국, "특별검사제 도입에 관한 一考", 형사법연구, (12), pp.421~441 (1999), 한국형사법학회
  13. 조국, "특별검사제 재론-특별검사제의 한시적 상설화를 위한 제언", 형사정책, 14(1), pp.53~71 (2002), 한국형사정책학회
  14. 하태훈, "검찰권 통제 및 검찰제도 개혁 방안", 법과사회, (37), pp.91~112 (2009), 법과사회이론학회
  15. 박미숙, "음란물의 위기에서 본 형법적 규제의 기본방향", 형사정책, 14(1), pp.7~276 (2002), 한국형사정책학회
  16. 한상훈, "외국의 검찰제도와 한국검찰 개혁에 대한 시사점", 법과사회, (37), pp.121~149 (2009), 법과사회이론학회
  17. 허일태, "기소편의주의와 기소재량에 대한 통제방안", 형사정책, 14(1), pp.27~52 (2002), 한국형사정책학회
  18. "국회 사법개혁특위 6인소위 합의사항에 대한 의견서" (2011)[URL]
  19. "역대 9번의 특별검사제를 통해서 본 고위공직자비리수사처의 필요성" (2010)[URL]
  20. "고위공직자비리조사처 설치 특례법 입법청원안" (2002)[URL]
  21. "고위공직자비리수사처설치에 관한 법률 제정에 관한 청원" (2010)[URL]
  22. "부패방지법 제정 국회의원 서명 과반수 돌파 기자회견 및 부패방지법 시민입법청원" (1996)[URL]
  23. "참여연대, 검사장 직선제 토론회 개최”(2010.3.8.)" (2010)[URL]
  24. "(4) 견제장치가 절실하다 “독립된 사정기구 만들어야”… 공수처 신설 대안으로" (2010)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)