본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유치장 감찰제도의 역사적 형성에 관한 연구 - 제도개선의 필요성을 중심으로 -

A Study on Historical Formation of House of Detention Supervise System in Republic of Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In accordance with the Korea Criminal Procedure Law, public prosecutors supervise regularly, at least once a month, the arrest and detention facilities operated by the Korean National Police. Public prosecutors are required to inspect whether there has been any severe mistreatment such as torture as well as any illegal arrest and detention by police through examining the documents concerned and interviewing directly criminal suspects. If they uncover anything illegal, they are then obliged to redress them or a criminal case must be referred to the prosecutors’ office. This supervising system was introduced as Article 21, revision of Korea Criminal Procedure Law, laws and ordinances of South Chosun interim government no. 176 which was instituted by the U.S. Armed government in 1948. It aimed at removing the human rights-violating judicial process which had been implemented in Korea during the Japanese colonial period. And it was enacted as Article 198-2, Korea Criminal Procedure Law by paraconstitutional organization called the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction which was established by the military government after its coup in 1961. In terms of the legislative origin, this supervising system sets the goal of respecting and protecting the human rights of criminal suspects. However, this system is being operated anomalously by public prosecutors as a way to strengthen their rights to command criminal investigation over the police. In reality, the supervising prosecutors examine or demand police administrative documents which are irrelevant to any illegal arrest and detention. Even, prosecutors are known to not interview the criminal suspects. This can cause unnecessary conflict between the police and the public prosecutors. This study critically examines the historical formation and the actual operation of this supervising system. The research also argues that it is time to remove or reform this system. In addition, there is a need to detain and manage criminal suspects at a place run by the judicial organization not by the police.

Abstract

In accordance with the Korea Criminal Procedure Law, public prosecutors supervise regularly, at least once a month, the arrest and detention facilities operated by the Korean National Police. Public prosecutors are required to inspect whether there has been any severe mistreatment such as torture as well as any illegal arrest and detention by police through examining the documents concerned and interviewing directly criminal suspects. If they uncover anything illegal, they are then obliged to redress them or a criminal case must be referred to the prosecutors’ office. This supervising system was introduced as Article 21, revision of Korea Criminal Procedure Law, laws and ordinances of South Chosun interim government no. 176 which was instituted by the U.S. Armed government in 1948. It aimed at removing the human rights-violating judicial process which had been implemented in Korea during the Japanese colonial period. And it was enacted as Article 198-2, Korea Criminal Procedure Law by paraconstitutional organization called the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction which was established by the military government after its coup in 1961. In terms of the legislative origin, this supervising system sets the goal of respecting and protecting the human rights of criminal suspects. However, this system is being operated anomalously by public prosecutors as a way to strengthen their rights to command criminal investigation over the police. In reality, the supervising prosecutors examine or demand police administrative documents which are irrelevant to any illegal arrest and detention. Even, prosecutors are known to not interview the criminal suspects. This can cause unnecessary conflict between the police and the public prosecutors. This study critically examines the historical formation and the actual operation of this supervising system. The research also argues that it is time to remove or reform this system. In addition, there is a need to detain and manage criminal suspects at a place run by the judicial organization not by the police.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 경찰청, "경찰관직무집행법 해설" (2001), 경찰청
  2. 大檢察廳, "檢察提要" (1945)
  3. 대검찰청, "한국 검찰사" (1976), 대검찰청
  4. 閔復基, "刑事訴訟改正法槪說(附 關係法令, 訓令, 樣式解說)" (1948), 朝鮮出版文化社
  5. 서울지검동부지청, "유치장감찰자료집" (1993), 서울지검동부지청
  6. 경찰관직무집행법에 관한 연구, "한국형사정책연구원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.한국형사정책연구원 연구보고서 93-29 (1995)
  7. 손영조, "북한의 수사구조 연구", 경찰학연구, 8(1), pp.135~159 (2008), 경찰대학
  8. 심희기, "미군정법령 제176호 형사소송법의 개정", 법사학연구, (16), pp.117~165 (1995), 한국법사학회
  9. 양춘용, "유치장감찰", 검찰, (34) (1971), 대검찰청
  10. 최종고, "해방 후 한국 기본법제의 정비과정 in: 한국법사학논총" (1991), 박영사
  11. 法政社, , 法政, 2(2) (1947), 法政社
  12. 法政社, , 法政, 2(8) (1947), 法政社
  13. 法政社, , 法政, 3(2) (1948), 法政社
  14. 法政社, , 法政, 3(5) (1948), 法政社
  15. 法政社, , 法政, 3(10) (1948), 法政社
  16. "동아일보, 1948. 3.25", ~ (1948)
  17. 정부기록보존소, "차석·상석 검사회의 협의결정사항에 관한 건”, 검찰예규에 관한 기록(1945-1946)" (1945)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)