기업범죄의 억제를 위한 최근의 정책동향과 과제
The Corporate Crime Deterring Problem : Recent Trends and Problems
1
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As social activities of corporations or groups have increased, the increase of offenses committed by the organizations have followed. To control these crimes, a variety of sanctions are devised. The diverse sanctions include criminal sanctions applied by Provisions of Dual Punishment (the provisions charging both corporations and wrongdoers), the surcharge as an administrative sanction, measures to ensure the performance of duties such as an administrative publicity and reject of supply, etc. However, these policies to control corporate crimes have limits. Recently, introduction of newly formed punishment has been proposed. They are as follows: introduction of provision to forfeit and to impose additional charge to the corporation, formal publicity of conviction, equity fines, community service, probation, restitution, remedial order, and disorganizing the corporations. These proposals are considered, in a positive way, as they are designated to make unique criminal sanctions for corporations based on the differences of characteristic between companies and natural persons. Despite the appraisal, they are not introduced. This paper analyzed recent tendency of policies, especially focused on which policies are presented to control the corporate offenses in 2000s, and suggested possible solutions for the future.
Abstract
As social activities of corporations or groups have increased, the increase of offenses committed by the organizations have followed. To control these crimes, a variety of sanctions are devised. The diverse sanctions include criminal sanctions applied by Provisions of Dual Punishment (the provisions charging both corporations and wrongdoers), the surcharge as an administrative sanction, measures to ensure the performance of duties such as an administrative publicity and reject of supply, etc. However, these policies to control corporate crimes have limits. Recently, introduction of newly formed punishment has been proposed. They are as follows: introduction of provision to forfeit and to impose additional charge to the corporation, formal publicity of conviction, equity fines, community service, probation, restitution, remedial order, and disorganizing the corporations. These proposals are considered, in a positive way, as they are designated to make unique criminal sanctions for corporations based on the differences of characteristic between companies and natural persons. Despite the appraisal, they are not introduced. This paper analyzed recent tendency of policies, especially focused on which policies are presented to control the corporate offenses in 2000s, and suggested possible solutions for the future.
참고문헌 (16)
- 양벌규정의 유형별 문제점과 개선방안, "국회사무처 법제실", 2~ (2003)
- 국회 법제실, "입안기준에 대한 몇 가지 재검토, 법제현안 제2007-16호", 12~ (2007)
- 양벌규정의 개선방안에 관한 연구, "박미숙", 한국형사정책연구원, 1~ (2008)
- 조병선, "양벌규정의 구조와 행위자의 특징, In 형법개정 및 양벌규정 개선 공청회 자료집", 209~ (2008)
- "국가경쟁력강화위원회 제5차 회의 보도자료", ~ (2008)
- 국회 법제실, "행정법상 금전적 제재에 관한 입안기준의 검토", 1~ (2007)
- 행정형법상의 제재수단에 관한 연구, "박기석", 한국형사정책연구원, 112~ (1995)
- 박기석, "법인에 대한 형벌로서의 공표", 한양법학, 7, pp.84~ (1996)
- 박강우, "기업범죄의 현황 및 정책분석", 116~ (1999)
- 안영균, "감사위원회의 법과 실무", BFL, (13), pp.26~ (2005), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 박기석, "법인범죄에 대한 효율적 제재방안에 관한 연구", pp.57~ (1996), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박강우, "기업범죄에 대한 형사제재, In 한일형사법의 과제와 전망", pp.133~ (2000)
- 이상복, "기업범죄와 내부통제", pp.286~ (2005), 삼우사
- 전지연, "형법적 제조물책임에서 주의의무위반과 신뢰의 원칙", 법학연구, 17(4), pp.1~29 (2007), 법학연구원
- 전지연, "형벌론의 관점에서 본 형법적 제조물책임의 필요성", 형사정책, 13(1), pp.83~ (2001)
