본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기업에 대한 제재수단의 문제점과 개선방안

The Problem and Improvement of the Administrative Regulations on Enterprise's Unlawful Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Act to have special aims impose the vicarious administration execution, administrative punishment and penalty surcharge, fine for negligence, charge for compelling the performance if the enterprise has been violated this act. If the enterprise don't fulfill his duties, administrative authorities can't achieve the goal of acts. Administrative authorities have prepared variety administrative regulations for achievement the goal of acts and overcoming problems of an enterprise's unlawful act. Tough enforcement is essential for a strong market and enterprise since it ensures that wrongdoers are punished and relinquish any benefits obtained by violations. A tough enforcement system is essential to preserve the integrity of our market. However, over-enforcement, enforcement in excess of that needed to deter, can entail serious unnecessary costs. Penalty surcharge, fine for negligence and charge for compelling the performance imposed on enterprises are borne by innocent investors and shareholders, thus reducing their returns. Therefore, it is important that administrative authorities will be find out the optimum level of administrative regulations and balance of sanctions, for exsample the vicarious administration execution, administrative punishment, penalty surcharge, fine for negligence and charge for compelling the performance. In this article, with these issues in mind, I would like to explore problems of administrative regulations, specially problems of double punishment and excess sanction. And then, I would try to examine the optimum level of administrative regulations and balance of sanctions.

Abstract

The Act to have special aims impose the vicarious administration execution, administrative punishment and penalty surcharge, fine for negligence, charge for compelling the performance if the enterprise has been violated this act. If the enterprise don't fulfill his duties, administrative authorities can't achieve the goal of acts. Administrative authorities have prepared variety administrative regulations for achievement the goal of acts and overcoming problems of an enterprise's unlawful act. Tough enforcement is essential for a strong market and enterprise since it ensures that wrongdoers are punished and relinquish any benefits obtained by violations. A tough enforcement system is essential to preserve the integrity of our market. However, over-enforcement, enforcement in excess of that needed to deter, can entail serious unnecessary costs. Penalty surcharge, fine for negligence and charge for compelling the performance imposed on enterprises are borne by innocent investors and shareholders, thus reducing their returns. Therefore, it is important that administrative authorities will be find out the optimum level of administrative regulations and balance of sanctions, for exsample the vicarious administration execution, administrative punishment, penalty surcharge, fine for negligence and charge for compelling the performance. In this article, with these issues in mind, I would like to explore problems of administrative regulations, specially problems of double punishment and excess sanction. And then, I would try to examine the optimum level of administrative regulations and balance of sanctions.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" (2006), 박영사
  2. 김인선, "“국가형벌권의 근거와 한계”, ?국회입법조사월보?, 2000. 12", ~ (2000)
  3. 김종보, "“이행강제금의 법적 쟁점”, ?건축행정분야 행정처분기준의 법적과제?, 한국법제연구원 워크샵 자료, 2007", ~ (2007)
  4. 김창범, "“법령심사과정에서 본 경제행정분야 행정처분기준의 현황과 문제점”, ?행정처분기준 정비방안 연구(Ⅱ)? 워크삽 자료집, 한국법제연구원, 2007. 4", ~ (2007)
  5. 김철용, "행정법Ⅰ" (2006), 박영사
  6. 박균성, "행정법강의" (2007), 박영사
  7. 박세일, "법경제학" (2007), 박영사
  8. 박윤흔, "행정법강의(상)" (2004), 박영사
  9. 박정훈, "행정법과 법철학-현대 행정법에 있어 순수법학의 의미-", 행정법연구, (7) (2003), 행정법이론실무학회
  10. 법제처, "?법령입안 심사기준?, 2006", ~ (2006)
  11. 배영길, "과징금 제도에 관한 연구", 공법학연구, 3(2) (2002), 한국비교공법학회
  12. 성낙인, "헌법학" (2008), 법문사
  13. 오용식, "“환경행정분야 행정처분기준의 현황과 개선방안”, ?행정처분기준 정비방안연구(Ⅱ)? 워크샵 자료집, 한국법제연구원, 2007. 6", ~ (2007)
  14. 유지태, "“행정질서벌의 체계”, ?법조? 제555호, 2002. 12", ~ (2002)
  15. 윤동호, "행정제재와 형사제재 병과의 이론과 현실", 형사정책연구, 17(1) (2006)
  16. 이기수, "경제법" (2004), 세창출판사
  17. 이철송, "“증권거래관련 손해배상청구제도의 구조”,「인권과 정의」제277호, 1999", ~ (1999)
  18. 정태용, "“영업정지처분에 갈음하는 과징금제도의 입법모델”,「입법모델Ⅲ」, 법제처, 2003", ~ (2003)
  19. 정호열, "경제법" (2006), 박영사
  20. 조정찬, "“이행강제금제도의 현황과 개선방안”,「입법모델Ⅲ」, 법제처, 2003", ~ (2003)
  21. 최봉석, "“행정형벌에 관한 일고”, ?법조? 제555호, 2002. 12", ~ (2002)
  22. 窪田充見, "“損害賠償”,「ジュリスト」第1228?, 2002", ~ (2002)
  23. 佐伯仁志, "“規制緩和と刑事法”,「ジュリスト」第1228?, 2002", ~ (2002)
  24. 白石忠志, "獨占去來法" (2006), 有斐閣
  25. 鈴木克昌, "會社法?金商法下の內部統制と開示" (2007), 商事法務
  26. 西津政信, "“わが?の行政規制の實效性確保のための新たな制度に關する硏究”, ?國土交通政策硏究? 第21??第22?, 2003. 6", ~ (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)