본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

새로운 형사재판에서 피해자의 권리보호

The Criminal Victim’s Right Protection in the New Criminal Trial

0

조회

0

다운로드

26

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

According to the amendment of the criminal procedure and the enactment of 『Peoples’s Participation in Criminal Trial Act』, the various changes are expected in Korean criminal Trial, 2008. First, the reformed criminal procedure is composed of the new changes strenthening the transparency and protecting the victim’s right. For example of the latter, enlarging the prosecution compelling system for making the decision of prosecution transparent, stipulating of the victim’s right to state in trial, reinforcing the notice system for victim. Of course, this direction of changes is desirable. But when watching on the victim’s place and sight, the Juror’s trial under 『Peoples’s Participation in Criminal Trial Act』has contained many problems in relation to protection the victim’s right. In other wordes, the direction and contents of『Peoples’s Participation in Criminal Trial Act』have attached too much importance to protecting the right of the accused. For example, in relation to stating of the juror’s trial, only the intention of the accused is deliberated. It means that the victim is neglected in the juror’s trial. In particular, this problem stand out prominently in connection to the juror’s trial for the sex offense. Consequently, it is necessary to judge of starting of the juror’s trial in consideration of the victim’s intent.

Abstract

According to the amendment of the criminal procedure and the enactment of 『Peoples’s Participation in Criminal Trial Act』, the various changes are expected in Korean criminal Trial, 2008. First, the reformed criminal procedure is composed of the new changes strenthening the transparency and protecting the victim’s right. For example of the latter, enlarging the prosecution compelling system for making the decision of prosecution transparent, stipulating of the victim’s right to state in trial, reinforcing the notice system for victim. Of course, this direction of changes is desirable. But when watching on the victim’s place and sight, the Juror’s trial under 『Peoples’s Participation in Criminal Trial Act』has contained many problems in relation to protection the victim’s right. In other wordes, the direction and contents of『Peoples’s Participation in Criminal Trial Act』have attached too much importance to protecting the right of the accused. For example, in relation to stating of the juror’s trial, only the intention of the accused is deliberated. It means that the victim is neglected in the juror’s trial. In particular, this problem stand out prominently in connection to the juror’s trial for the sex offense. Consequently, it is necessary to judge of starting of the juror’s trial in consideration of the victim’s intent.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 법무부, "개정 형사소송법" (2007)
  2. 법원행정처, "새로운 형사재판의 이해" (2007)
  3. 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정법률 해설" (2007)
  4. 법원행정처, "국민참여재판의 이해" (2007)
  5. 이완규, "개정 형사소송법의 쟁점" (2007), 탐구사
  6. 신동운, "형사소송법제정자료집" (1990), 형사정책연구원
  7. 닐 비드마르, "세계의 배심제도" (2007), 나남출판
  8. 이완규, "개정 형사소송법의 쟁점과 방향", 저스티스, (100)통권 : 100, pp.127~161 (2007), 한국법학원
  9. 정웅석, "개정 형사소송법의 평가와 향후과제", 저스티스, (101)통권 : 101, pp.205~235 (2007), 한국법학원
  10. 대법원, "현행제도의 문제점과 개혁의 기본방향 in:사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅲ)" (2004)
  11. 이재상, "형사소송법 일부개정법률안에 대하여 in:국회 공청회 토론자료" (2006)
  12. 김태명, "개정 형사소송법상 재정신청제도에 대한 비판적 검토", 형사법연구, 19(4), pp.75~98 (2007), 한국형사법학회
  13. 최병호, "범죄피해자의 형사절차 참여방안", 피해자학연구, 14(1) (2006)
  14. 박상식, "범죄피해자의 의견진술권에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.75~115 (2006), 한국피해자학회
  15. 박달현, "보충성원칙과 친고죄의 본질", 비교형사법연구, 3(1) (2001)
  16. 윤동호, "피해자의 의사와 형사절차", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.117~146 (2006), 한국피해자학회
  17. 이용식, "형사피해자의 지위에 대한 소고", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.5~22 (2006), 한국피해자학회
  18. 정진경, "「국민의 형사재판 참여에 관한 법률」에 따른 배심원재판의 유의점-2006. 4. 12, 모의재판 경험을 바탕으로-", 저스티스 통권, 통권 : 100 (2007)
  19. 김현석, "국민참여재판의 도입에 따른 공판절차의 변화", 저스티스, (101)통권 : 101, pp.108~149 (2007), 한국법학원
  20. 김용세, "개정 형사소송법의 범죄피해 보호규정", 피해자학연구, 15(2) (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)