본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

피해자 권리의 실효성 확보에 관한 소고

A Study on Securing the Crime Victims’ Real Rights

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Korean legal system might be said that it has established the minimum legal basis for protecting the crime victims’rights through legislating or amending the constitution, criminal procedure law and other special codes until now. However, even though the legal system seems to be built successfully at a glance, it does not result automatically in securing the victims’real rights. On a surface, they pretend to be the victims’rights but actually they belong to ‘illusionary rights’. There are many cases which the victims’ rights have functioned as the illusionary rights on the federal laws and state constitution in America. Similarly, if being analyzed the characteristic of various victims’ rights in Korea, some have been proved to be real such as the right of securing personal safety, on the other hand, however, some illusionary such as the right to timely notice of any public proceeding, not to be excluded from any such public proceeding, and to full restitution as provided in law. To become real, crime victims’ rights must be accompanied by victim standing through solving discretion problem, meaningful remedy, and review as a matter of right. In the case of Korea, the scope of victims’participation into criminal proceeding should be enlarged much more so that victims could address their own interest at every step of the criminal procedure. Secondly, the courts should try to make a judicial review positively with a deep understanding to victims’ suffering. Thirdly, the legislators should use the mandatory language as much as they can. I f they cannot help using the discretionary language, the more detailed instructions should be offered on the sub-code level or the independent regulative agency should be established for controlling the abuse of discretion of criminal authorities.

Abstract

Korean legal system might be said that it has established the minimum legal basis for protecting the crime victims’rights through legislating or amending the constitution, criminal procedure law and other special codes until now. However, even though the legal system seems to be built successfully at a glance, it does not result automatically in securing the victims’real rights. On a surface, they pretend to be the victims’rights but actually they belong to ‘illusionary rights’. There are many cases which the victims’ rights have functioned as the illusionary rights on the federal laws and state constitution in America. Similarly, if being analyzed the characteristic of various victims’ rights in Korea, some have been proved to be real such as the right of securing personal safety, on the other hand, however, some illusionary such as the right to timely notice of any public proceeding, not to be excluded from any such public proceeding, and to full restitution as provided in law. To become real, crime victims’ rights must be accompanied by victim standing through solving discretion problem, meaningful remedy, and review as a matter of right. In the case of Korea, the scope of victims’participation into criminal proceeding should be enlarged much more so that victims could address their own interest at every step of the criminal procedure. Secondly, the courts should try to make a judicial review positively with a deep understanding to victims’ suffering. Thirdly, the legislators should use the mandatory language as much as they can. I f they cannot help using the discretionary language, the more detailed instructions should be offered on the sub-code level or the independent regulative agency should be established for controlling the abuse of discretion of criminal authorities.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김재민, "공직자 부패 문제에 대한 피해자학적 접근", 피해자학연구, 20(1), pp.205~235 (2012), 한국피해자학회[DOI]
  2. 류병관, "당사자주의 소송구조에 있어 범죄피해자의 권리 -미국의 범죄피해자권리법(2004)을 중심으로 -", 피해자학연구, 19(1), pp.35~56 (2011), 한국피해자학회
  3. 신동운, "간추린 신형사소송법" (2007), 법문사
  4. 이진국, "범죄피해자의 공판참가를 위한 입법적 과제", 형사정책연구, 21(4), pp.221~250 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
  5. 조균석, "형사재판절차에서의 범죄피해자참가제도의 도입 방안", 피해자학연구, 18(1), pp.5~29 (2010), 한국피해자학회
  6. 천진호, "범죄피해자의 권리 확보방안", 피해자학연구, 15(1), pp.5~36 (2007), 한국피해자학회
  7. 허일태, "기소편의주의와 기소재량에 대한 통제방안", 형사정책, 14(1) (2002)
  8. Beloof, E. Douglas, "The Third Wave of Crime Victims’ Rights : Standing, Remedy, and Review", Brigham Young University Law Review (2005)
  9. Boland, L. Mary, "Crime Victims’ Rights : From Illusion to Reality", Criminal Justice, 24(1) (2009)
  10. Dussich, P. J. John, "Raising the Global Standards for Victims :The Proposed Convention on Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power", Proceedings of the 4th Symposium of the Tokiwa International Victimology Institute (2008)
  11. Elias, Roberts, "The Politics of Victimization" (1986), Oxford University Press
  12. Garneer, A. Bryan, "Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Pocket edition" (2001), West Group
  13. Kirchhoff, F. Gerd, "What is Victimology?", Tokiwa International Victimology Institute, No. 1, ~ (2005)
  14. Wolhuter, Lorraine, "Victimology" (2009), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)