唐末五代變革期 선종의 흥기배경
Background of Zen's Uprising in the late Tang and the transitional Five Dynasties periods
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
폐불사건도 있었던 당말오대변혁기에 다른 종파들은 쇠퇴해감에도 불구하고 선종은 오히려 5가7종라는 종파가 생겨나고, 그 중에서도 특히 조사선이 성행하게 되는 계기를 마련한다. 이것은 당시의 정치적 상황이나 선종내의 노력이 빚어낸 결과이다. 먼저 정치적 상황으로, 안녹산의 난 이후 지방의 통제를 위해 설치했던 행정기구인 번진의 독립화, 특히 화북지역의 경제력 강화에 따른 자립과 회창폐불단행을 들었다. 이런 당시 상황은 회창폐불을 단행했을 때 환속승들의 은신처가 되고 선종의 종풍을 펼칠 수 있는 기회의 땅이 된다. 그 대표적인 한 사람이 주로 하북지방에서 독자적인 교화를 펼친 임제의현이다. 한편 내적으로는 경전의 역할을 하는 어록과 승속을 차별하지 않는 민중생활 속에서의 엄격한 수행을 규정한 청규의 성립, 민중 속에서의 수행상 제시, 그리고 사원경제의 안정성, 즉 자급자족제로부터 단월의존 일변도로의 변화 등 선사들이 자신만의 독특한 종풍을 펴는 데에 탄탄한 기틀이 된다. 이처럼 선종은 당말오대라는 시대적 변화의 진통시기에 중국민족의 생활과 중국사상의 문물 속으로 내던져져 노동금지ㆍ승속의 엄격한 구분 등에 대한 타파 격이 된 것은 인도불교를 부정하려는 의도에서가 아니라 현실에 대한 절대긍정에서 출발하여 완전하게 중국식으로 자연스럽게 배인 결과라고도 할 수 있다.
Abstract
In the late Tang and the Five Dynasties periods, China faced large-scale transitions throughout the entire area including politics, economy, and society. As for Buddhism, even persecution came during the reign of Emperor Wuzong in the Tang Dynasty. As a result, various Buddhist sects declined while Zen developed many schools and became prosperous. Throughout the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Period and even after the Song Dynasty, Chinese people considered Zen as Buddhism itself even though there were other numerous Buddhist sects. A significant change in quality, thus, had occurred from dogmatic and aristocratic to practical and popular Buddhism. Among various schools of Zen, the Linji school which emphasized Patriarchal Zen became mainstream. This was possible through the efforts of Linji Yixuan, the founder of the Linji School. In the late Tang, he went to Hebei, north of Yellow River, to avoid severe persecution by Emperor Wuzong. At that time, the area voiced opposition against the Tang Dynasty. It had sufficient economic bases and its main products came from agriculture. Based on its economic power, Hebei area became more and more independent from the central government, so it didn't mind central orders. Warriors and powerful clans acted as authorities, and it was they who offered protection for Linji Yixuan to establish the Linji school. Due to the persecution, monks should face the reality of daily life as lay persons while dealing with the challenge to revive Buddhism. To make a breakthrough in resolving this dilemma, not only Linji but other Zen teachers made every possible effort based on positive acknowledgement of the reality they faced, and through their efforts as follows, Zen was able to become the most popular Buddhism in China. The words of the classical masters were collected in the texts to play a role as Sutras and the books of Zen monastic regulations were made to provide strict practices to monks who lived a life which didn't differentiate them from lay persons. Also, the development of a temple in which monks all performed mundane tasks made it possible for Zen teachers to deepen their thought and establish their own schools. This kind of self-sufficient temples acted as a stronghold for Zen at the beginning until it found strong financial supports from the authorities. Likewise, Zen was established by eliminating the difference between monks and lay persons, abolishing the prohibition against mundane activities, and by accepting Chinese cultural thoughts as well as everyday life of Chinese people. In other words, Zen was not the denial of Indian Buddhism, but the result of natural adaptation of Indian Buddhism to Chinese life, which in return, led to the blooming prosperity of Zen in China.
참고문헌 (30)
- 關口眞大, "禪宗思想史" (1989), 홍법원
- 堀敏一, "唐末五代變革期の政治と經濟" (2002), 汲古書院
- 鈴木哲雄, "唐五代禪宗史" (1985), 山喜房佛書林
- 柳田聖山, "禪의 思想과 歷史" (1989), 민족사
- 柳田聖山, "語錄の歷史 -禪文獻の成立史的硏究-" (1985), 京都大學校
- 常盤大定, "支那佛敎の硏究" (1943), 春秋社
- 阿部肇一, "(增訂)中國禪宗史の硏究 -政治社會史的考察-" (1986), 硏文出版
- 宇井伯壽, "禪宗史硏究" (1966), 岩波書店
- 이부키 아츠시, "새롭게 다시 쓰는 중국 禪의 역사" (2005), 대숲바람
- 田上太秀, "禪の思想 -インド源流から道元まで-" (1980), 東京書籍
- 정성본, "禪思想史" (1993), 禪文化硏究所
- 최현각, "선학의 이해" (2003), 불교시대사
- 沖本克己, "새롭게 쓴 선종사" (1993), 불교시대사
- 沖本克己, "禪の思想とその流れ" (1990), 世界聖典刊行協會
- 礡波護, "中國歷史硏究入門" (2006), 名古屋大學出版會
- 강경중, "唐代 河北三鎭의 長期割據의 社會經濟的 基盤", 인문학연구, 36(1), pp.345~374 (2009), 인문과학연구소
- 近藤良一, "唐代禪宗の經濟基盤", 日本佛敎學會年報, (37) (1972), 日本佛敎學會
- 金宗燮, "唐代 中央과 沿岸 藩鎭의 關係-對外業務를 중심으로-", 중국사연구, (50), pp.93~123 (2007), 중국사학회
- 金宗燮, "五代王朝의 정책과 幕職官", 中國古代史硏究, (11) (2004), 중국고대사학회
- 鈴木哲雄, "江西地方における禪宗各派の展開", 日本佛敎學會年報, (45) (1979), 日本佛敎學會
- 西尾賢隆, "宋代日本佛敎交流史", 佛敎史學硏究, 19(1) (1977), 佛敎史學會
- 西尾賢隆, "中国仏教史における褝への推移", 禪文化硏究所紀要, (14) (1987), 禪文化硏究所
- 西尾賢隆, "(森三樹三郞博士頌壽記念)東洋學論集 in 會昌廢佛と金栗如來" (1979), 朋友書店
- 元永常, "南北朝時代の疑僞經における末法思想の形成", 印度學佛敎學硏究, 51(1) (2002), 日本印度學佛敎學會
- 柳田聖山, "唐末五代の河北地方に於ける禪宗興起の歷史的社會的事情について", 日本佛敎學會年, (25) (1959), 日本佛敎學會
- 李 永 哲, "唐代 藩鎭 幕職官 構成과 人員制限", 중국사연구, (51), pp.263~294 (2007), 중국사학회
- 鄭炳俊, "唐末五代 藩鎭體制에 대한 硏究史的 考察", 中國學報, (40) (1999), 한국중국학회
- 鄭炳俊, "日知錄 ‘藩鎭’ 記事를 통해 본 唐末五代의 藩鎭像", 中國學報, (44) (2001), 한국중국학회
- 中砂明德, "後期唐朝の江淮支配 -元和時代の一側面-", 東洋史硏究, (46) (1987), 京都大學內 東洋史硏究會
- 沖本克己, "禪宗における修行とその理論的根據", 日本佛敎學會年報, (45) (1979), 日本佛敎學會
