『결사문』에 나타난 보조지눌의 삼학관(三學觀) 고찰

Abstract

In this paper, examines how Bojo ginul deals with the gyea jeong-hye Samhak in terms of semi-confucianism. Great master, Bojo ginul(普照知訥: 1158-1210) saw the greatest standard of distinguishing between regeneration and buddha as ‘one mind’ if one deludes one mind. One is regeneration and if one realizes one mind, one is Buddha. The context is that both regeneration and buddha are basically the same if anyone performs, they can realize. If Jinul wants to achieve enlightenment, he must believe deeply that his mind is originally clean and his anguish is originally siege, and reflects on his self-consciousness to perform selection and banya. In the selection and the performance of Banya, it is based on the account Hye Samhak which is said in the Buddhist tradition. The Samhak is the foundation of Buddhist practice, and the viewpoints recognized by the great monks and Northeast Asian Seon Buddhism from the early and the buffa are different from each other, which had been gradually seen since the early by the Bupa, And after the great victory, it was recognized as Samhak Ilge or Samhak Equality in the lineage of the ship, especially Namjong Line. In the conclusion, Jinul is a trilogy in terms of anti-conscientiousness, and clearly distinguishes and explains what can be obtained through basic meanings and performances of each item of the system and the government. And the performance of Samhak is the artificial performance of the Muru saint, which can be said to be a different view of jinul because Samhak is the content of all the performers of Yuru and Muru. However, Jinul said that the three-study performances of the anti-Jojaseon is a pair of honors, which is performed in the artificiality of the saint. As the saint Muru achieved the department of the saint, if the performer of the three-study is not retreated to the faithfulness but the performance of the anti-conscientiousness, it reaches the boundary of the Buddha.