본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수학 수업 발문유형 분석 및 대안 탐색 - 신임 교사 사례 연구 -

An Analysis on the pattern of questioning sentence - A case study for the newly appointed teachers -

0

조회

0

다운로드

30

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

이 연구는 2년차 신임 교사의 사례 연구를 통해 수학 수업에 대한 신임교사의 발문 유형의 특성을 분석하고 그에 따른 대안을 탐색하기 위한 것이다. 연구 결과, 확인을 위한 발문이 가장 많았으며(69%), 이해를 위한 발문(25%), 성찰을 위한 발문(6%) 순이었고, 창의성 신장을 위한 발문은 하지 않는 것을 알 수 있었다. 더불어 기존 연구를 바탕으로 신임교사의 발문과 관련된 대안적인 창의성 신장을 위한 발문을 제안해 보았다.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to search the recognition of teacher on the pattern and characteristics of the questioning sentence of the newly appointed teachers for the mathematics class through the case study for the 2ndyear teachers. The study participants’ class was recorded in video and individual interview was made for 4 times. The pattern of the questioning sentence in the observed class was analyzed using the classification frame with addition of creativity related items to the classification frame suggested by Mogan & Saxton(2006). The questioning sentence and recognition on the mathematics class for the newly appointed teachers were analyzed based on the individual meeting and class materials. In result, the questioning sentence for confirmation was most frequent (69%) and questioning sentence of understanding (25%) and the questioning sentence for introspection (6%) in its priority. It was known that the questioning sentence for extending the creativity didn't make it at all. It was revealed that the participant teachers in this study used the questioning sentence pattern for fact confirmation of the student most frequently and the use of the questioning sentence for accelerating the creative thinking of the student was lacked. In addition, the teachers recognized that they manage the class oriented to questioning sentence for obtaining the concept. It was known that the education for the questioning sentence which accelerates the creativity and other thinking as well as the fact confirmation pattern is necessary through the training for the new teachers in the future.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅳ) 수학, 과학, 실과" (2008), 대한교과서 주식회사
  2. 권낙원, "좋은 수업을 위한 질문법" (1999), 교학사
  3. 이인학, "신교육심리학" (2006), 교육과학사
  4. 김정현, "초등학교 수학 수업에서 이루어지는 교사의 발문 분석", 석사, pp.2003
  5. 박만구, "초등 수학교과서의 창의성 신장을 위한 발문", 초등수학교육, 13(1), pp.25~35 (2010), 한국수학교육학회
  6. 박만구, "학습자 중심의 수학 수업에서 교사의 발문 분석", 한국학교수학회논문집, 9(4), pp.425~457 (2006), 한국학교수학회
  7. 박병학, "발문법 원론" (1986), 세광출판사
  8. 이용률, "수학 지도의 기초 기본" (1998), 경문사
  9. Burns,M, "Math by all means:multiplication-grade 3.Sausalito" (1991), Math Solutions Publications
  10. Haylock, D, "Understanding mathematics for young children" (1984), C&M Publishers
  11. Heibert, J, "Instructional tasks, classroom discourse and student's learning in second grade arithmetic", American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), pp.393~425 (1993)
  12. Krutetskii,V.A, "The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchilren" (1976), The university of Chicago Press
  13. Morgan, N, "Asking better questions" (2006), Pembroke Publishers
  14. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics" (2000)
  15. Polya,G, "어떻게 문제를 풀 것인가" (1957), 천재교육
  16. Susan,G.S, "Patterns jumping out of mathematics teacher", 98(4), pp.224~227 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)