고려율령조문을 통해 본 君臣秩序와 刑罰－당․송과의 비교를 통하여－

Abstract

This paper examines the status of King Goryeo by comparing the laws of Tang and Song with their punishments. First of all, we examined the order of King and bureaucrat through the law. Among the ten evil provisions centered on rebellion(謀反), conspiracy(謀大逆), treason(謀叛), and great disrespect(大不敬) are directly related to the order of King and bureaucrat. Rebellion and other acts absolutely represent the status of the king as a national order, which has the advantage of family order, another composition of the law. In this respect, Goryeo is the same as Tang and Song. In addition, in legislation, like Tang and Song, the terms emperor and crown prince were used. Secondly, the contents of the punishment were analyzed the order of ing and bureaucrat. Under the Dang's law, conspiracy(謀大逆), treason(謀叛) were carried out and beheaded, but there was a difference in punishment at the time of rebellion(謀反). The rebels were all beheaded regardless of whether they were carried out or not, but the following crimes were hanged in the mock stage. The participants were also punished differently. However, in the Southern Song period, the sentence was changed to exile. In Song, conspiracy(謀大逆) was translated into a dead culture, replacing the revolt(謀逆) and included rebellion(謀反), conspiracy(謀大逆), treason(謀叛) in this category. The punishment of the great disrespect(大不敬) varies according to each act, starting with beheading. The punishment of Goryeo is the same as that of 『Goryeosa』 treason. In addition, the use of 'the revolt(謀逆)'of the Song dynasty is becoming more common. Third, if the status of King Goryeo was the same as that of Tang and Song, we looked at what the status of King Goryeo was both at home and abroad. First of all, it was observed in Korea through underwater rituals. During the former interference period, when Goryeo's status declined, the king of Goryeo used the Imperial robe and yellow sunshade. On the other hand, Goryeo plays a role as an emperor in another international order that differs from the Chinese-centered international order. In this negative diplomatic stance, one can see the traditional view of the world centered on one's own country.