체제적 보편자로서의 추상노동-네오리카디언과 가치형태분석을 넘어
Abstract Labour as the Systemic Universal, Beyond the Neo-Ricardian and the Value-Form Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Marx는 ≪자본론≫에서 추상노동 개념을 인간적인 에너지 일반의 지출이라는, ‘생리적’이고 초역사적인 개념이라는 혐의를 불러일으키는 방식으로간단히 처리하였다. 가치실체의 <발생론>을 본고는 초기 역사이론으로서의사적유물론과 후기 ≪자본론≫의 자본주의 해부학 간에 연결고리를 찾음으로써 해결하려고 했다. 즉 근대생산력의 특질, 즉 노동의 <주도성>, <평등성>, <전면적 상호의존성>로부터 자본주의 생산관계를 도출하는 작업을 수행한 후 추상노동이 자본주의의 체제적 보편이 되는 근거를 확립한다. 이를근거로 네오리카디언의 표준모델과 가치형태론을 비판했다. 최근 Kicillof &Starosta의 연구, Murray의 연구가 물성으로서의 추상노동 개념을 다시 복구하려고 했지만 근대생산력의 핵심적 특질을 발견하지 못하고 실패했음을 밝혔다.
Abstract
It is certainly true that Marx’s renditon of abstract labour is too brief, definedas the expenditure of human energy in general which is suspected to be aphysiological and ahistorical one, and to be the same as that of Ricardo’s‘embodied labour’. This paper tries to establish the genesis of abstract labour asa systemic universal by finding the missing link between the specificity of themodern industrial productive power, that is, ①the primacy of human labour inthe production process, ②equality of each and every labour, ③their universalinterdependence and capitalist relations of production(especially private property,market, commodification of labour power). Based on this, the Neo-Ricardian andthe form-analysis are respectively rejected as the proper formulations and/oradequate foundations of Marxian political economy. Two recent theoreticalattempts at rediscovering the specific materiality in Marx’s original concept ofabstract labour are assessed and found to have failed in this.
참고문헌 (50)
- 강남훈, "땅콩가치론, 황소가치론과 리카도적 편향의 정정", 사회경제평론, (10) (1997)
- 이채언, "춘계박광순박사 화갑기념논문집, 경제학논집(별책)" (1993)
- 조원희, "가치이론논쟁" (1995), 풀빛
- 조원희, "자본주의 제도론:동학적 접근", 사회경제평론, (14) (2000)
- 조원희, "사유재산, 시장 그리고 외부효과-시장과 비시장 영역의 상호작용", 사회경제평론, 37(1), pp.255~310 (2011), 한국사회경제학회
- 한국사회경제학회, "가치이론논쟁-정치경제학의 새로운 모색을 위하여" (1995), 풀빛
- Alcorn John H., "Workers, Inputs and Exploitation: A Note on Roemer", Review of Radical Political Economics, 19(2) (1987)
- Arthur, Chris J., "The Spectral Ontoogy of Value", Radical Philosophy, 107 (2001)
- Arthur, Chris J., "Value, Labour and Negativity", Capital and Class, 73 (2001)
- Backhaus, Hans G., "On the Diatectics of the Value-Form", Thesis Eleven, 1 (1980)
- Bidet, J., "The Dialectician’s Interpretation of Capital", Historical Materialism, 13(2) (2005)
- Bonefeld, W., "Abstract Labour: Against its Nature and on its Time", Capital and Class, 34(2) (2010)
- Bonefeld, W., "Debating Abstract Labour", Capital and Class, 35(2) (2011)
- Bowles, S., "Structure and Practice in the Labour Theory of Value", Review of Radical Political Economics, 12(4) (1981)
- Bowles, S., "Rethinking Marxism" (1985)
- Carchedi, G., "A Note on Chris Arthur’s Dialectic of Negativity", Capital and Class, 81 (2003)
- Carchedi, G., "The Fallacies of ‘New Dialectics’ and Value-Form Theory", Historical Materialism, 17 (2009)
- Colletti, L., "The Subtle Anatomy of Capitalism" (1970), California Goodyear Publishing Co
- DeAngelis M., "Beyond the Technological and Social Paradigms: A Political Reading of Abstract Labour as the Substance of Value", Capital and Class, 57(Autumn) (1995)
- DeVroey, M., "On the Obsolescence of the Marxian Theory of Value: A Critical Review", Capital and Class, 17 (1982)
- Drakopoulos, S.A., "Values and Economic Theory The Case of Hedonism" (1991), Avebury
- Eldred, M., "Critique of Competitive Freedom and the Boutgeois Democratic State: Outline of a Form-analytic Extension of Marx’s Uncompleted System" (1984), Kurasje
- Eldred, Michael, "Reconstructing Valu-Form Analysis", Capital and Class, 13 (1981)
- Ehrbar Hans, "The labor Theory of Value and its Critics", Science and Society, L(4) (1986)
- Fine, Ben, "From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics, The Shifting Boundaries between Economics and Other Social Sciences" (2009), Routledge
- Frachia, Joseph, "On Transhistorical Abstractions and the Intersection of Historical Theory and Social Critique", Historical Materialism, 12(3) (2004)
- Gansmann, Heiner, "Marx without the Labor Theory of Value?", Social Research, 50(2) (1983)
- Gansmann, Heiner, "Abstract Labour as a Metaphor? A Comment on Steedman", History of Political Economy, 20(3) (1988)
- Gleicher, "A Historical Approach to the Question of Abstract Labour", Capital and Class, 21 (1983)
- Hunt, I., "The Economic Cell-Form", Historical Materialism, 13(2) (2005)
- Kicillof, Axel, "On Materiality and Social Form: A Political Critique of Rubin’s Value-Form Theory", Historical Materialism, 15 (2007)
- Kicillof, Axel, "On Value and Abstract Labour: A Reply to Werner Bonefeld", Capital and Class, 35(2) (2011)
- Kincaid, Jim, "A Critique of Value-Form Marxism", Historical Materialism, 13(2) (2005)
- Lee, C.O., "Marx’s Labour Theory of Value Revisited", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17(2) (1993)
- Likitkijsomboon, Pichit, "The Hegelian Dialectic and Marx’s Capital", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16 (1992)
- Marx, Karl, "Grundrisse, Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy(Rough Draft)" (1973), Penguin Books
- Marx, Karl, "Capital, Volumn 1" (1976), Penguin
- Marx, Karl, "Value:Studies by Karl Marx" (1976), New Park Publicatons
- Murray, Patrick, "Marx’s ‘Truly Social’ Labour Theory of Value:Part I, Abstract Labour in Marxian Value Theory", Historical Materialism, 6 (2000)
- Marx, Karl, "Collected Works(MECW), Vol.6" (1976)
- Postone, M., "Time, Labor, and Social Domination, A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Reuten, G., "Value-Form and the State" (1989), Routledge
- Reuten, G., "The Interconnection of Systematic Dialectic and Historical Materialism", Historical Materialism, 7 (2000)
- Robles-Baez, Mario L., "The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics" (2004), Edward Elgar
- Roemer, John E., "A General Theory of Exploitation and Class" (1982), Harvard University Press
- Rubin, I., "Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value" (1972), Black Rose
- Saad-Filho, Alfredo, "Concrete and Abstract Labour in Marx’s Theory of Value", Review of Political Economy, 9(4) (1997)
- Smith, Murray E.G., "Alienation, Exploitation and Abstract Labor: A Humanist Defense of Marx’s Theory of Value", Review of Radical Political Economics, 26(1) (1994)
- Sweezy, P., "Karl Marx and the Close of His System by Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk & Böhm-Bawerk’s Criticism of Marx by Rudolf Hilferding" (1984), Orion Editions
- Weeks, John, "Abstract Labor and Commodity Production", Research in Political Economy, 12 (1990)
