본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Symbolic Analysis of Unification Education in South and North Korea: Focus on Moon-min Government and Kim Il-Sung system

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The most important course is ‘political and ideological education’ at every school level in North Korea. In the Thesis on Socialist Education, this viewpoint is clearly expressed. Only students who are prominent in political and ideological learning can be of a revolutionary mind and grow up to be idealistic people. Therefore, not only art and physical education but also science and technical education can bear fruit only when they are based on political and ideological culture. That is why political and ideological education is emphasized in the curricula of North Korean schools. On the other hand,South Korea has tried to drive dé tente on the Korean Peninsula and end the tragic situation of confrontation and division between the South and North since the establishment a democratic government in 1990. As a result of this effort, South Korea built a Unification Garden in December 1990 and an Observatory for Unification in February 1992. Unification education signifies the education that actualizes the cherished wish of the people, unification, and furthermore, forms the right attitude and values for achieving a better quality of life in a unified nation. Therefore, unification education, along with efforts to promote unification, should include content about life after unification and the preparation for it. It should help the people prepare for the prosperity of the nation, but also teach how to defend against the obstacles or threatening elements to a balanced unification, form rational values of unification, and act according to these values. The environment of unification education is now changing rapidly since the historic South and North Korean summit at the beginning of the new millennium. A new paradigm in unification education is required that states has ‘the mutual recognition, cooperation, and appeasement of both the South and North’ as its symbol for modern times, even though in the past it was ‘mutual competition and confrontation

Abstract

The most important course is ‘political and ideological education’ at every school level in North Korea. In the Thesis on Socialist Education, this viewpoint is clearly expressed. Only students who are prominent in political and ideological learning can be of a revolutionary mind and grow up to be idealistic people. Therefore, not only art and physical education but also science and technical education can bear fruit only when they are based on political and ideological culture. That is why political and ideological education is emphasized in the curricula of North Korean schools. On the other hand,South Korea has tried to drive dé tente on the Korean Peninsula and end the tragic situation of confrontation and division between the South and North since the establishment a democratic government in 1990. As a result of this effort, South Korea built a Unification Garden in December 1990 and an Observatory for Unification in February 1992. Unification education signifies the education that actualizes the cherished wish of the people, unification, and furthermore, forms the right attitude and values for achieving a better quality of life in a unified nation. Therefore, unification education, along with efforts to promote unification, should include content about life after unification and the preparation for it. It should help the people prepare for the prosperity of the nation, but also teach how to defend against the obstacles or threatening elements to a balanced unification, form rational values of unification, and act according to these values. The environment of unification education is now changing rapidly since the historic South and North Korean summit at the beginning of the new millennium. A new paradigm in unification education is required that states has ‘the mutual recognition, cooperation, and appeasement of both the South and North’ as its symbol for modern times, even though in the past it was ‘mutual competition and confrontation

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Almond, G. A, "Comparative Politics" (1980), Little, Brown and Company
  2. Qualitative Research in Student Affairs. Ann Arbor, Mi: Eric Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services, "Bloland, P. A", Eric Document, ~, pp.Reproduction Service No. Ed 347 487 (1992)
  3. Blumer, H, "Symbolic Interactionism" (1969), Prentice-Hall
  4. Bureau of Statistics, "Comparison of economy and society in South and North Korea" (1999), the Bureau of Statistics
  5. Cassirer, E, "The Myth of the State" (1946), Doubleday Anchor Books
  6. Choi, I. W, "The unified educational direction for South and North Korean unification Studies in the Unification Problem", 3(1), pp.348~349 (1993)
  7. Choi, M. S, "Research on North Korea's pre-school education", 석사, pp.1996
  8. Choi, M. S, "Kindergarten educational system in North Korea. (Social development issues of unification era)" (1997), Kwangiu University
  9. Chung, S. H, "Comparative theory in South and North Korea" (1997), People and People
  10. Cohen, A, "Two-Dimensional Man: An Essay on the Anthropology of Power and Symbolism in Complex Society" (1976), University of California
  11. Ebers, M, "Understanding Organzations: The Poetic Mode", Journal of Management, 11(2) (1985)
  12. Edelman, M, "The Symbolic Use of Politics" (1967), University of Illinois Press
  13. Edelman, M, "Politics As Symbolic Action" (1971), Markham Publishing
  14. Edelman, M, "Political Language" (1977), Academic Press
  15. Educational Publisher, "Socialist education science" (1988), Pyongyang
  16. Educational Publisher, "Communist moral education (first-fourth grade)" (1990), Educational Publisher
  17. Elder, C. D, "The Political Useses of Symbols" (1983), Longman
  18. Han, S. J, "Personality and ideology education in South and North Korea" (1998), Jib Moon Dang Publishing
  19. Hwang, B. D, "Research on unification education's improvement" (1997), National Unification Research Center
  20. Jung, S. H, "Comparative theory in South and North Korea" (1997), People and People
  21. Kang, G. S, "Public administrative science" (1989), Educational Scientific
  22. Kim, H. M, "The study on development educational programs in the globalization era" (1998), Reseach Center for National Ethics
  23. Kim, I. S, "For restoring development after war" (1953), Chosen Labor Party
  24. Kim, I. S, "On the grand achievement fo development of education" (1978), Chosen Labor Party
  25. Kim, I. S, "The grade Juche ideology" (1978), Chosen Labor Party
  26. Kim, I. S, "84). Kim Il Sung's works(Vols. 1-40)" (1979), Chosen Labor Party
  27. Kim, J. I, "To further improve the education of the children" (1976), Chosen Labor Party
  28. kim, K. U, "Politics and socialization in North Korea" (1995), parkyoungsa
  29. Langer, S. K, "Philosophy in A New Key : A Study in the Symbolism of Reasearch" (1942), Harvard University
  30. Larson-Daugherty, C, "The Employee Relationship : A Phenomenological Study of Retention and the Information Age Technology Worker", 박사, pp.2000
  31. Lasswell, H. D, "Politics : Who Gets What, When, How?" (1958), World
  32. Lee. D. H, "Moral education" (1985), Educational Science Publishing Press
  33. Lee, K. W, "Critical understanding of Korean education" (1993), Hanul Academy
  34. Lee, S. W, "North Korea 40 years" (1989), EI Yu MunHwa publishing Co
  35. Lee, Y. H, "History of education in Chosen six" (1995), Social Scientific
  36. Min, B. C, "Direction of unification education in schools" (1997), Chung Ang University
  37. Ministry of Education, "Directory book one of ethics for teachers in middle school" (1994), Korean Textbook
  38. Ministry of Unification, "North Korean outline" (1992), Ministry of Unification
  39. Ministry of Unification, "Guidelines for unification education" (1995), Ministry of Unification
  40. Ministry of Unification, "Childhood education in North Korea" (1998), Ministry of Unification
  41. Ministry of Unification, "Lives and education of North Korean children" (1998), Ministry of Unification
  42. Nam, K. K, "Comparative policy study" (1998), Bubmunsa
  43. Pfeffer, J, "Management as Symbolic Action : The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms", Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, pp.1~52 (1981)
  44. Pondy, L. R, "Organizational Symbolism" (1983), Jai Press
  45. Schutz, A, "Symbol, Reality And Society, In Symbols and Society" (1955), Harper
  46. Shin, C. H, "Kindergarten Education. Pyongyang" (1992), Teacher's College of Kim, Hyung Jick
  47. Son, J. K, "North Korea theory" (1996), Hakmunsa
  48. Steinbruner, John D, "The Cybernetic Theory of Decision" (1974), Princeton University Press
  49. Thomas, R. M, "Politics And Education" (1983), Pergamon Press
  50. Turner, B. A, "Sociological Aspects of Organizational Symbolism" (1986)
  51. White, L. A, "The Concept of Culture" (1973), Burgess
  52. Whitmont, E. C, "The Symbolic Quest" (1969), Harper Colophon
  53. Williams, R. M, "American Society : A Sociological Interpretation" (1960), Knopf
  54. Wilson, B. N, "The Role of Symbols in Forming the Public Policy of the War on Poverty" (1979), University of Michigan
  55. Comparison of the education systems of South and North Korea, "Yoo, I. J", Sung Sill University, ~ (2011)
  56. Yoo, Y. H, "Artistic theory of symbolism and romanticism" (1976), Reseach Theory
  57. Yoo, Y. O, "The unified classroom of professor Yoo" (2012), HakMunSa
  58. Yoo, Y. O, "Psychological and social prospects to overcome the heterogeneity between South and North Korea", Korean Council of Political Science Journal, 7 (1997)
  59. Yun, K. Y, "Direction for unification education of exchange: Cooperative era in South and North Korea" (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)