공무원의 실적주의 인사제도와 단체교섭의 공존: 가능성과 도전
The Coexistence of Merits Systems and Collective Negotiation in Public Personnel Administration : Feasibility and Challenge
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 우리나라 공무원을 대상으로 실적주의 인사제도와 단체교섭제도 간의 갈등가능성을 탐색하고, 두 제도의 조화로운 공존가능성을 검토하기 위해 작성되었다. 이를 위해 실적제와 단체교섭제도의 개념과 두 제도간의 갈등가능성을 이론적으로 검토하였으며, 갈등해소를 위해 노력해 온 미국정부의 앞선 경험을 소개하였다. 나아가 지난 5년간 우리나라 지방자치단체의 공무원노사 간에 체결된 단체협약의 주요 내용을 분석하여, 우리나라에서 실적제 요소들이 단체교섭제도에서 어떻게 다루어지고 있는지를 경험적으로 분석하였다. 분석결과 교섭대상이 될 수 없는 실적제의 필수적 영역에 대해서 공무원 단체교섭의 위협이 전혀 없는 것은 아니었으나, 아직은 우려할 만큼 광범위하게 현실화되지 않은 것을 발견하였다.
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the potential conflicts between the dual systems in public personnel administration - merit systems and collective negotiation- and search the feasibility of peaceful coexistence of them. To achieve the purpose, we first reviewed the concepts of the dual systems and possibility of conflicts between the two systems theoretically, and then introduced the U.S. governments' experience for resolving the matters. Furthermore, we empirically analyzed the collective contract documents which had been made for last 5 years between the labor unions and their managing counterparts in Korea local governments. The findings revealed that the collective negotiation system legalized since 2006 does not seriously threatened the essential aspects of merit systems at least so far.
참고문헌 (24)
- 강성철, "새인사행정론" (1999), 대영문화사
- 노동부, "공무원노조법 주요내용 및 쟁점해설" (2005), 교육교재
- 노동부, "공무원 단체협약 위법여부 등 판단 및 조치기준" (2009), 3
- 김선정, "한국인사행정론" (2010), 한국학술정보
- 하재룡, "공공부문과 민간부문의 노사관계 비교", 한국정책과학회보, 4(2), pp.179~207 (2000)
- 하재룡, "공무원노조의 미래: 미국 공무원노조의 역사적 발전과정을 통해 미리보기", 한국행정사학지, (24), pp.1~36 (2009), 한국행정사학회
- Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, "Labor-Management Policies for Stateand Local Government", Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, pp.51~90 (1969)
- Ban,C, "Union, Management, and NPR. In D. E. Kettl and J. J. Dilulio, Jr. (eds). Inside theReinvention Machine: Appraising Governmental Reform. Washington" (1995), DC: Brookings Institution
- Camp, Paul M, "Bilateralism and the Merit Principle", PublicAdministration Review, 28(2), pp.132~137 (1968)
- Douglas,Joel M, "State Civil Service and Collective Bargaining System in Conflict", PublicAdministration Review, 52(2), pp.162~172 (1992)
- Feigenbaum, "Civil Service and Collective Bargaining: Conflict or Compatability", Public Personnel Management, pp.244~252 (1974)
- Gerhart,P, "The Scope of Bargaining in Local Government Labor Negotiations", Labor LawJournal, 20, pp.545~552 (1969)
- Gerschenfeld, G, "The Scope of Collective Bargaining in J. Ravin et al.eds., Handbook on Public Personnel Administration and Labor Relations" (1983), New York:Marcel Dekker
- Guiler, "Dual Personnel Systems - Organized Labor and CivilService: Side by Side in Public Sector", Journal of Labor Research, 25, pp.199~209 (2004)
- Helburn, I. B, "Public employee Bargaining and the Merit Principle", LaborLaw Journal, 23(10), pp.618~629 (1972)
- Kearney,Richard C, "Labor Relations in Public Sector.New" (1992)
- Kearney, "Labor Relations in Public Sector" (2001), New York:Marcel Dekker
- "Mosher, (1982)", ~
- Nigro, A. Felix, "Management-Employee Relations in the Public Service" (1969), Chicago: PublicPersonnel Association
- Schafritz, "Personnel Management in Government. 4th ed" (1992), New York: Marcel Dekker
- Spero, S. D, "The Urban Community and Its Unionized Bureaucracies" (1973), New york: Dunellen
- Stanley, "What Are Union Doing to Merit Systems", Public Personnel Review (1970)
- Warner, Kenneth O, "Public Management at the Bargaining Table" (1967), Chicago: Public Personnel Association
- Wurf,J, "Merit: A Union View. Public administration Review", 34, pp.431~434 (1974)