본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본 신탁과세제도와 그 시사점

Implications On the Trust Taxation In Japan

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

The comparative legal research of current trust taxations in Korea and Japan gives some meaningful implications, which are as follows: First, it is necessary to introduce the concept of trust taxed as corporation into the Corporate Tax Law in Korea. Second, the pass-through of losses incurred in trust to beneficiary should be limited to the specific amount under the appropriate loss limitation rules. Third, it is necessary to make clear which trust is to be taxed on the receipt by beneficiaries of trust income without entity-level tax. Fourth, anti-abuse rules are necessary for preventing the tax avoidance through trust created by declaration of trust. Fifth, the taxation of trust with public purpose should be integrated into the taxation of trust without beneficiaries. Sixth, the tax treatments of trust with successive beneficiaries should be clarified on the perspectives of Individual Income Tax, Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. 根田正樹, "信託の法務·稅務·會計", pp.11~36 (2007), 學陽書房
  2. 藤本幸彦, "信託の稅務一信託と集團投資ストラクチャ一", 稅務經理協會, 3~13 (2007)
  3. 藤本幸彦, "投資ストラクチャ一の稅務", 稅務經理協會, 75~96 (2007)
  4. 이중기, "신탁법의 개정방향.신탁법총칙의 개정.신탁관계인제도의 개정.새로운 신탁의 도입", 법무부 신탁법 개정 공청회자료, 3~27
  5. 이창희, "세법강의, 제8판", pp.504~507 (2009), 박영사
  6. 김용호, "비등록유동화거래의 실태와 법적문제", BFL, (31), pp.45~67, 서울대학교 금융법센터
  7. James M. Peaslee, "Federal Income Taxation of Securitization Transactions, 3rd edition", Frank J. Fabozzi Associates, 216~244 (2001)
  8. OECD, "Model Tax Conventional on Income and on Capital, condensed version", OECD, ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (41건)