본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사회기반시설의 헌법적 의의와 국가의 책임

Constitutional Study on Social Infrastructure and State Responsibility

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since the law was enacted in 1994 to attract private capital, Private Finance Initiative for Social Infrastructure Project has been increasing steadily in Korea. Private investment for Social Infrastructure is resulted from the nation’s fiscal limit with construction and management of the social infrastructure. However, prior to focusing on real needs it must be accompanied by sufficient normative review. In this respect, this paper, from some fundamental sense, aims to find constitutional significance of the Social Infrastructure and constitutional responsibility of the state about it to provide the basis for discussion on Private Finance Initiative for Social Infrastructure. As public goods with characteristics non-rivalry and nonexcludability, Social Infrastructure performs the important public functions, that’s why it is hard to expect the formation of a working market with effective competition and optimal resource allocation. Also, it is essential to use land for construction community-based facilities and if private operators expropriate land it is hard to meet the requirements as a condition of the land expropriation. Furthermore, the supply and distribution of the community-based facilitiesshould be determined after careful consideration for the comprehensive development plan of the country, the benefits and burdens of future generations, and efficient and balanced use of the whole country. Thus, on the Social Infrastructure it is not appropriate to entrust to private operators. Withal, Because most Social Infrastructures are network structure, it is an essential condition for achieving integration to maintain a state as a unity. Social Infrastructure is not only a physical condition for the people to exercise their rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution actually, but an essential means to realize balanced elevatation of the quality of life for all citizens, balanced growth of the national economy, balanced utilization of the land of the nation, and social justice all that required by Constitution. In this respect, when Congress make a law on Private Finance Initiative for Social Infrastructure Project, must consider the country's constitutional responsibility for the Social Infrastructure.

Abstract

Since the law was enacted in 1994 to attract private capital, Private Finance Initiative for Social Infrastructure Project has been increasing steadily in Korea. Private investment for Social Infrastructure is resulted from the nation’s fiscal limit with construction and management of the social infrastructure. However, prior to focusing on real needs it must be accompanied by sufficient normative review. In this respect, this paper, from some fundamental sense, aims to find constitutional significance of the Social Infrastructure and constitutional responsibility of the state about it to provide the basis for discussion on Private Finance Initiative for Social Infrastructure. As public goods with characteristics non-rivalry and nonexcludability, Social Infrastructure performs the important public functions, that’s why it is hard to expect the formation of a working market with effective competition and optimal resource allocation. Also, it is essential to use land for construction community-based facilities and if private operators expropriate land it is hard to meet the requirements as a condition of the land expropriation. Furthermore, the supply and distribution of the community-based facilitiesshould be determined after careful consideration for the comprehensive development plan of the country, the benefits and burdens of future generations, and efficient and balanced use of the whole country. Thus, on the Social Infrastructure it is not appropriate to entrust to private operators. Withal, Because most Social Infrastructures are network structure, it is an essential condition for achieving integration to maintain a state as a unity. Social Infrastructure is not only a physical condition for the people to exercise their rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution actually, but an essential means to realize balanced elevatation of the quality of life for all citizens, balanced growth of the national economy, balanced utilization of the land of the nation, and social justice all that required by Constitution. In this respect, when Congress make a law on Private Finance Initiative for Social Infrastructure Project, must consider the country's constitutional responsibility for the Social Infrastructure.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 임상일, "헌법의 기능에 대한 경제 원리 적용", 사회과학논문집, 27(1), pp.276~ (2009)
  2. World Development Report 1994, Infrastructure for Development, "World Bank", Oxford Press, 2~ (1994)
  3. 손재영, "사회간접자본 정책의 성과와 문제", 지역연구, 10(1), pp.106~ (1994)
  4. Georg Hermes, "Gewährleistungsverantwortung als Infrastrukturverantwortung, In Der Gewährleistungsstaat -Ein Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand", pp.112~ (2005), Nomos
  5. 최병선, "정부규제론", pp.76~80 (2006), 법문사
  6. 류해웅, "사회간접 자본시설과 공용수용법리와의 관계", 토지공법연구, 1, pp.117~118 (1995)
  7. 이명훈, "외부재 및 공공재 정의의 조화", 한국재정학회 학술대회, pp.76~ (2008)
  8. 양지청, "지역경제 및 사회간접자본론", pp.15~ (2002), 청양
  9. 장경채, "현대경제학의 이해", pp.208~212 (2000), 무역경영사
  10. 이준구, "재정학", pp.90~ (2011), 茶山出版社
  11. Dieter Grimm, "Der Wandel der Staatsaufgaben und die Zukunft der Verfassung, In Staatsaufgaben, Baden-Baden", pp.625~ (1994), Nomos
  12. 2010년 민간투자사업 운영현황 및 추진실적, "기획재정부", 기획재정부, 10~16 (2011)
  13. 이부하, "헌법상 국가의 개념과 내용", 한양법학, (23), pp.355~376 (2008), 한양법학회
  14. 이부하, "사회통합과 헌법 -스멘트의 통합론을 분석하며-", 세계헌법연구, 16(3), pp.1~24 (2010), 세계헌법학회한국학회
  15. 김선택, "다문화사회와 헌법", 헌법학연구, 16(2), pp.1~41 (2010), 한국헌법학회
  16. Georg Hermes, "Staatliche Infrastrukturverantwortung", pp.324~ (1998), Mohr Siebeck
  17. Fritz Ossenbühl, "Verkehr, Ökonomie und Ökologie im verfassungsrechtlichen Spannungsfeld, NuR 1996, S. 55; Udo Steiner, Recht der Verkehrswirtschaft", pp.127~ (1996), Springer
  18. 이인호, "디지털시대의 정보법질서와 정보기본권, 정보사회에 대비한 일반법 연구(Ⅳ)", pp.106~ (2002), 정보통신정책연구원
  19. 김일환, "기본권의 제한과 침해의 구별 필요성에 관한 고찰", 공법연구, 27(2), pp.317~ (1999)
  20. 장영철, "基本權의 事實的 制限", 공법연구, 35(1), pp.439~463 (2006), 한국공법학회
  21. 정태호, "자유권적 기본권의 “제한”에 관한 고찰 - 이른바 사실상의 기본권 제약(faktische Grunbdrechtsbeeinträchtigung) 을 중심으로", 헌법논총, 13, pp.561~ (2002)
  22. 최갑선, "자유권적 기본권의 침해여부 판단구 조 및 판단기준", 헌법논총, 10, pp.383~ (1999)
  23. 양승업, "지방자치단체의 공공시설에 대한 입장료 및 사용료 징수에 관한 고찰", 공법학연구, 8(4), pp.381~406 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
  24. 김현아, "지역간 인구이동의 실증분석", 응용경제, 10(2), pp.75~103 (2008), 한국응용경제학회
  25. 전광석, "헌법과 국민통합", 법제연구, (30), pp.7~33 (2006), 한국법제연구원
  26. 송석윤, "국가역할의 역사적 변천 -근대국가의 미래와 관련하여", 법과사회, 20, pp.9~ (2001)
  27. 전광석, "사회변화와 헌법과제로서의 복지국가의 실현", 공법연구, 31(1), pp.3~3 (2002), 한국공법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)