宗中의 構成과 本質에 관한 法理 小考
A Study on Composition and Naturethe of agnatic Descent Group
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The families of the same clan are groups composed for the protection of common ancestors' groves, memorial service of their ancestors, and cultivation of mutual friendship between the members of the families of the same clan. Our country has no statutory norms about the families of the same clan, so has regulated them with conventional law. In the meantime, the supreme court has had the stance that the families of the same clan are spontaneous groups without any separate organizing act or rules, and they are naturally joined by majorities without any joining procedures. The theory of spontaneity like this has triggered a lot of legal disputes about the families of the same clan. First of all, descendents of common ancestors become the members of the families of the same clan by all means without any separate joining procedures, so difficulty of grasping who the members of the families of the same clan are and where they live in convening the general meeting of the families of the same clan for their decision-making makes it hard to notify the call of the general meeting. It is also troubling to understand the scale and existence of the overall members of the families of the same clan in fixing quorum of conference and resolution to decide proceedings or elect a representative. Also whether a member is eligible can be certified only by a clan register, which is a private register, and extinguished or distorted a lot, so if its authenticity is in doubt, it is difficult to catch hold of the descendent of common ancestors. Also up to recently, the qualification of the members of the families of the same clan are granted only to men of legal age, so it has been criticized as discrimination of women, and women's qualification of the members of the families of the same clan was not accepted until the supreme court 2005. 7. 21.sentence 2002Da1178 Decision. However, the theory of spontaneity like this started on the distorted grasp of conventional practice to theory of spontaneity like this in the Japanese, has brought forth plenty of property disputes of the theory of spontaneity like this these days, so a new approach is necessary. Namely, the families of the same clan should be considered being constituted they have their rules or representatives through artificial organizing acts, and any descendent of common ancestors don't become the members of the families of the same clan concurrently when they become adults, but need any separate joining procedures. Thus, women or daughters' grandchildren are qualified for the members of the families of the same clan, and become the members of the families of the same clan. And in case of distributing the property of the families of the same clan, it should be considered being allocated only to the members of the families of the same clan.
참고문헌 (28)
- 이경희, "오키나와 토오토메 承繼에 관한 一考察", 법사학연구, (21), pp.5~29 (2000), 한국법사학회
- 윤진수, "變化하는 사회와 宗中에 관한 慣習", 사법, 1(1), pp.3~36 (2007), 사법발전재단
- 이진기, "종중재산의 법리에 관한 판례이론의 검토", 가족법연구, 15(2), pp.327~329 (2001)
- 차선자, "종중에 대한 고찰- 단체법과 여성주의적 시각에서 -", 인권과 정의, (371), pp.81~95 (2007), 대한변호사협회
- 鄭光鉉, "韓國家族法硏究", 서울대학교, ~ (1967)
- 朝鮮總督府, "中樞院의 回示", 司法協會雜誌, 18(11), pp.992~ (1939)
- 李東明, "宗中에 대한 法的 規律 ―慣習에서 成文의 法律로!―", 민사판례연구, 19, pp.551~ (1997), 민사판례연구회
- 한삼인, "宗中에 관한 判例分析", 인권과 정의, (369), pp.147~169 (2007), 대한변호사협회
- 許 奎, "宗中.宗中財産에 關한 諸考察 : 沿革的.實務的, 司法論集 第4輯", 법원행정처, 10~ (1973)
- 윤대성, "韓國人의 法俗에서 본 宗中과 宗中財産에 관한 法的問題", 昌原地方辯護士會誌, (3), pp.99~ (1998), 창원지방변호사회
- 姜信雄, "宗中의 法的 性質과 宗中財産 登記에 관한 考察", 社會科學硏究, 3, pp.218~ (1980), 조선대학교 사회과학연구소
- 박정화, "고유의미의 종중과 종중에 유사한 비법인 사단", 裁判과 判例, 6, pp.43~ (1997), 대구판례연구회
- 淺見倫太郞, "朝鮮法制史稿", pp.32~ (1922), 宋庵堂
- 朝鮮土地地稅制度調査報告書, "和田一朗", 13~14 (1920)
- 野村調太郞, "宗中にす關する法律關係", 司法協會雜誌, 18(11), pp.1~2 (1939)
- 宮崎孝治郞, "財産承繼制度の比較法的硏究-農業基本法の基調を求めて", pp.271~ (1961), 勁草書房
- 高昌鉉, "宗中財産에 관한 法的考察, 法大論叢 제2집", pp.86~ (1982), 경북대출판부
- 윤진수, "變化하는 사회와 宗中에 관한 慣習", 사법, 1(1), pp.3~36 (2007), 사법발전재단
- 李在性, "우리나라 舊來의 慣習에 의한 宗中의 成立時期, 辯護士", 法律實務硏究, 25, pp.169~ (1995), 서울지방변호사회
- 金時昇, "宗中의 法律的 性格", 判例硏究, 4, pp.342~ (1994), 부산판례연구회
- 沈羲基, "宗中의 團體性과 所有形態", 법사학연구, (10), pp.14~33 (1989)
- 이재상, "우리나라 舊來의 관습에 의한 종중의 성립시기, 이재상판례평석집XI", 268~269
- 이호규, "韓國傳統社會에 있어서의 團體的 所有-특히 宗中을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1987
- 野村調太郞, "朝鮮祭祀相續法序說", pp.509~ (1939), 朝鮮總督府中樞院
- 이우석, "종중의 ‘자연발생적 단체설’에 대한 소고", 재산법연구, 24(1), pp.29~57 (2007), 한국재산법학회
- 文英和, "宗員의 資格을 成年男子로 제한하는 종래 慣習法의 效力, 21世紀司法의 展開", pp.427~ (2005), 박영사
- 沈羲基, "조선후기 토지 소유에 관한 연구-국가지주설과 공동체소유설 비판-", 박사, pp.1991
- 鄭肯植, "宗中財産의 法的問題, 韓國近代法制史攷", pp.223~ (2001), 博英社
