현행 강간죄 규정에 대한 재검토
The review on the current rule of rape in the Criminal Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the current article 297 of the Criminal Law, it rules that any person who causes another person to engage in a sexual act by using force or threat shall be imprisoned for 3 years or more than that under this article". The idea called rape is defined as committing adultery using force or threat against women. And also the legal definition of adultery is a sexual intercourse by man and woman who have not marital relations. Therefore, there arouses problem when these legal terms are applied to such cases as marital rape, homosexual rape and transgender rape. In order to resolve this problem, instead of rape, a newly revised name of this crime type so called "sexual assault" was proposed. In addition, it was examined to replace rape as a current necessary condition with the sexual act against the other person without permission. Finally,new amendment of this article of the Criminal Law was suggested. The terms of sexual assault has already been recognized and used practically in a society, so that there is no reason to adhere to using the term of rape which is value immanent and causes confusion in case of legal interpretation.
Abstract
According to the current article 297 of the Criminal Law, it rules that any person who causes another person to engage in a sexual act by using force or threat shall be imprisoned for 3 years or more than that under this article". The idea called rape is defined as committing adultery using force or threat against women. And also the legal definition of adultery is a sexual intercourse by man and woman who have not marital relations. Therefore, there arouses problem when these legal terms are applied to such cases as marital rape, homosexual rape and transgender rape. In order to resolve this problem, instead of rape, a newly revised name of this crime type so called "sexual assault" was proposed. In addition, it was examined to replace rape as a current necessary condition with the sexual act against the other person without permission. Finally,new amendment of this article of the Criminal Law was suggested. The terms of sexual assault has already been recognized and used practically in a society, so that there is no reason to adhere to using the term of rape which is value immanent and causes confusion in case of legal interpretation.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김혜정, "시대의 변화에 따른 강간죄의 객체 및 행위태양에 관한 재구성", 비교형사법연구, 9(1), pp.187~208 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김성돈, "형법각론" (2008), SKKUP
- 김종원, "형법각론" (1986), 한국사법행정학회
- 박상기, "형법각론" (2002), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2007), 홍문사
- 손동권, "형법각론" (2006), 율곡출판사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 이형국, "형법각론연구Ⅰ" (1997), 법문사
- 이회창, "주석 형법(Ⅳ)" (1997), 한국사법행정학회
- 임웅, "형법각론" (2008), 법문사
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2008), 삼지원
- 정웅석, "형법강의" (2008), 대명출판사
- 박선영, "부부강간과 성적 자기결정권", 시민과 변호사, 통권 : 99, pp.73~ (2002), 서울지방변호사회
- 이호중, "성폭력 처벌규정에 대한 비판적 성찰 및 재구성", 형사정책, 17(2), pp.81~114 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
- 김성천, "형법각론", pp.232~ (2006), 동현출판사
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2007), 박영사
- 오영근, "형법각론", pp.169~ (2006), 박영사
- 조국, "형사법의 성편향" (2004), 박영사
- 김용화, "강간개념의 재정립 : 폭행 · 협박에서 자기결정으로", 성균관법학, 19(2), pp.325~340 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이경재, "성폭력관련 형법개정안에 관한 소고", 고시계, 통권 : 602, pp.84~ (2007)
- 류 화 진, "우리 형법상 아내강간의 강간죄 성립여부", 여성연구, 2(67), pp.5~36 (2004), 한국여성정책연구원
- 박선영, "강간죄와 남근주의", 시민과 변호사, 통권 : 100 (2002), 서울지방변호사회
- 박미숙, "성폭력관련법률의 체계화 방안", 형사정책, 12(2), pp.251~ (2000), 한국형사정책학회
- 심영희, "성폭력의 실태와 법적통제", 한국여성학, 5 (1989), 한국여성학회
- 정현미, "성전환수술자의 강간죄의 객체여부", 형사판례연구, (6), pp.183~ (1999), 박영사
- 金台明, "性轉換을 둘러싼 法的 問題點에 대한 檢討", 저스티스, 71, pp.26~51 (2003), 한국법학원
- 이숙연, "부부강간죄에 대한 고찰 및 판례평석", 젠더법학, 1(2), pp.159~ (2009)
- "우리말 한자어 속뜻사전", pp.22~ (2007), LHB교육출판사
- 조국, "아내강간 불인정은 남성 편향의 과소범죄화", 시민과 변호사, 통권 : 129, pp.20~ (2004), 서울지방변호사회
- 조국, "아내강간-남성편향의 ‘과소범죄화’ 극복하기, in 성폭력, 법정에 서다" (2007), 푸른사상