국가의 교육ㆍ아동보호 정책과 부모의 자녀 양육ㆍ교육권에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Parents' Right in the Minors' Protection and Education Policy
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Constitution of the Republic of Korea Article 31 (1) states 'All citizens have rights to receive equal education according to their merits', guaranteeing people's right to education. 'Rights to receive education' means the State's responsibility to prepare facilities and systems necessary for making such equal education possible and to formulate an affirmative policy of providing substantively equal education to the socially and economically weak. Item 6 of the same Article states that the basic matters about school education, life-time education, and all other educational institutions, the management and finance thereof, and the status of teachers shall be specified by statute, specifying the State's power and responsibility in school education. The above provision delegated to the State the operation of school education, and thereby granted comprehensive regulatory power over schools and the responsibility for children's school education. Namely, Korea government must keep the national education system to guarantee people rights for education. And government has the responsibility to help juveniles grow into the persons of sound character and pushes the policy to regulate the distribution of harmful media materials and drugs, etc. among juveniles and their access to harmful entertainment establishments, and protect and rescue them from the injurious environment including harmful acts such as the abuse of and violence against them. Eventually, the nation's responsibility to educate and help juveniles grow into the persons of sound character collides over the parents' right of education in children's nurturing and education. Meanwhile, Constitutional Court of Korea said "Parents' right of education in children's nurturing and education are to be respected in all areas of education. Nonetheless, in the area of school education, the State was granted by Article 31 of the Constitution an authority over education independent in principle from parents' right of education. The State shares with parents the responsibility for children's education in that area. Outside that area, parents' right of education take precedence over the State's. But court and government of Korea rejected the parents' right to select their children's school and the parent's right to decide what school or teacher educate in the area of school education. And the Juvenile Protection Committee makes a decision on its own regulation of distribution of media materials harmful to juveniles. Furthermore, any online game service providers must not provide for juvenile to play online game from 0 A.M. to 6 A.M.. for juvenile protection. This article raises an objection in juvenile protection policy and education policy that parents' right was not considered and duly weighed.
Abstract
Constitution of the Republic of Korea Article 31 (1) states 'All citizens have rights to receive equal education according to their merits', guaranteeing people's right to education. 'Rights to receive education' means the State's responsibility to prepare facilities and systems necessary for making such equal education possible and to formulate an affirmative policy of providing substantively equal education to the socially and economically weak. Item 6 of the same Article states that the basic matters about school education, life-time education, and all other educational institutions, the management and finance thereof, and the status of teachers shall be specified by statute, specifying the State's power and responsibility in school education. The above provision delegated to the State the operation of school education, and thereby granted comprehensive regulatory power over schools and the responsibility for children's school education. Namely, Korea government must keep the national education system to guarantee people rights for education. And government has the responsibility to help juveniles grow into the persons of sound character and pushes the policy to regulate the distribution of harmful media materials and drugs, etc. among juveniles and their access to harmful entertainment establishments, and protect and rescue them from the injurious environment including harmful acts such as the abuse of and violence against them. Eventually, the nation's responsibility to educate and help juveniles grow into the persons of sound character collides over the parents' right of education in children's nurturing and education. Meanwhile, Constitutional Court of Korea said "Parents' right of education in children's nurturing and education are to be respected in all areas of education. Nonetheless, in the area of school education, the State was granted by Article 31 of the Constitution an authority over education independent in principle from parents' right of education. The State shares with parents the responsibility for children's education in that area. Outside that area, parents' right of education take precedence over the State's. But court and government of Korea rejected the parents' right to select their children's school and the parent's right to decide what school or teacher educate in the area of school education. And the Juvenile Protection Committee makes a decision on its own regulation of distribution of media materials harmful to juveniles. Furthermore, any online game service providers must not provide for juvenile to play online game from 0 A.M. to 6 A.M.. for juvenile protection. This article raises an objection in juvenile protection policy and education policy that parents' right was not considered and duly weighed.
참고문헌 (36)
- Andreas Hamann, "Helmut Lenz, Das Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23. Mai 1949", pp.214~ (1970)
- B. Friedrich Giese, "Grundgesetz für Bundesrepublik Deutschland", pp.35~ (1951)
- Faber, Tim, "Jugendschutz im Internet(Diss)", pp.78~ (2004), SöR
- Hans Heckel, "Schulrecht und Schulpolitik", pp.194~ (1967)
- Hellmut Becker, "Schule und Verwaltung, in Probleme einer Schulreform", pp.108~110 (1959)
- Hermann von Mangoldt, "Das Bonner Grundgesetz", pp.281~ (1957)
- Stefan, Engels, "Kinder und Jugendschutz in der Verfassung -Verankerung, Funktion und Verhältnis-", pp.212~ (1997), AöR
- "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights"[URL]
- "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"[URL]
- "CRC; Convention on the Rights of the Child"[URL]
- 강인수, "초ㆍ중등교육 관계법의 주요과제 :학생ㆍ교원ㆍ학부모의 교육권 보장과 조화", 교육법학연구, 11, pp.11~12 (1999), 대한교육법학회
- 권영성, "아동보호법에 의한 유해매체물의 유통규제, 고시연구", pp.114~ (1997)
- 김관수, "학부모의 교육권에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1996
- 김선택, "아동ㆍ청소년보호의 헌법적 기초 : 미성년 아동ㆍ청소년의 헌법적 지위와 부모의 양육권", 헌법논총, 8 (1997), 헌법재판소
- 건전한 정보통신 윤리확립과 개인정보 보호대책 방안 연구, "김철완", 정보통신정책연구원, 12~20 (2001)
- 김형성, "간행물 심의와 표현의 자유", 성균관법학, 17(3), pp.45~68 (2005), 법학연구소
- 노기호, "교원의 실체적 권리와 교육권의 제한에 관한 연구 ― 미국 연방대법원의 판례와 이론을 중심으로 ―", 법학논총, 28(2), pp.1~40 (2008), 법학연구소
- 노기호, "독일기본법상 교원의 교육의 자유와 제한", 법과 정책연구, 2(2) (2002), 한국법정책학회
- 안주열, "교원노조의 노동기본권에 관한 교육법적 고찰과 법교육적 함의", 공법학연구, 5(1), pp.93~120 (2004), 한국비교공법학회
- 이성환, "일본에 있어서의 교육권의 갈등과 그 조정", 교육법연구, 8(1), pp.170~ (2005), 한국교육법학회
- 전제철, "교사의 수업의 자유에 관한 연구", 시민교육연구, 36(2), pp.217~242 (2004), 한국사회과교육학회
- 정순원, "미국 홈스쿨 법제에 관한 연구", 교육법학연구, 22(1), pp.93~115 (2010), 대한교육법학회
- 정순원, "아동의 인격성장권과 사이버공간에서의 아동 보호", 박사, pp.2006
- 정필운, "교육영역에서 당사자의 권리ᆞ의무ᆞ권한에 대한 헌법이론적 고찰", 법학연구, 19(3)통권 : 43, pp.283~312 (2009), 법학연구원
- 조석훈, "학부모 교육권의 내용과 한계", 교육행정학연구, 24(3), pp.359~382 (2006), 한국교육행정학회
- 조석훈, "학교와 교육법" (2010), 교육과학사
- 허종렬, "교육에 관한 국가의 권한과 한계", 박사, pp.1993
- 헌법재판소, "헌법재판소 1996. 10. 31. 94헌가6", 판례집, 8(2), pp.395~ (1996)
- "헌법재판소 1996. 10. 4. 93헌가13등", 판례집, 8(2), pp.212~
- "헌법재판소 2001. 8. 30. 2000헌가9", 판례집, 8(2), pp.134~
- "헌재 1991. 2. 11. 90헌가27", 판례집, 3, pp.11~
- "헌재 1992. 11. 12. 89헌마88", 판례집, 4, pp.739~
- "헌재 1992.11.12, 89헌마88", 판례집, 4, pp.739~
- "헌재 2000.04.27, 98헌가16", 판례집, 12(1), pp.427~428 (2000)
- "헌재 2009.04.30, 2005헌마514", 판례집, 21(1), pp.185~ (2009)
- "헌재, 2000. 4. 27. 98헌가16ㆍ98헌마429(병합)", 헌재판례집, 12(1), pp.428~
