포괄임금제 법리의 새로운 검토
New approach to legal principles of the blanket wage system
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
'Blanket wage system'(hereinafter referred as 'BWS') is one of wage calculation methods in Korea, in which a worker would be paid fixed amount as her/his wage regardless of her/his real working hours. In BWS, always, she/he does overtime works, holiday works, etc. And she/he works long hours, and does not have any holiday or any vocation. The courts have conceded BWS up to some standards. Recently the Supreme Court concedes BWS in case that it would be difficult to calculate work hours. But, I think which would have no difficulties, but possibilities, really. The courts have made an excuse of 'difficulties', and have avoided the work time regulations on the Labor Standard Act,I think that it would be a desirable policy to abolish BWS. It would be more effect to amend the Labor Standard Act about prohibitions of BWS. That way a worker would be paid extra wages for her/his real overtime works and holiday works. So it would be lawful to paid her/him more fixed amount than real work hours.
Abstract
'Blanket wage system'(hereinafter referred as 'BWS') is one of wage calculation methods in Korea, in which a worker would be paid fixed amount as her/his wage regardless of her/his real working hours. In BWS, always, she/he does overtime works, holiday works, etc. And she/he works long hours, and does not have any holiday or any vocation. The courts have conceded BWS up to some standards. Recently the Supreme Court concedes BWS in case that it would be difficult to calculate work hours. But, I think which would have no difficulties, but possibilities, really. The courts have made an excuse of 'difficulties', and have avoided the work time regulations on the Labor Standard Act,I think that it would be a desirable policy to abolish BWS. It would be more effect to amend the Labor Standard Act about prohibitions of BWS. That way a worker would be paid extra wages for her/his real overtime works and holiday works. So it would be lawful to paid her/him more fixed amount than real work hours.
참고문헌 (14)
- 강성태, "근로기준법상 임금제도의 개선방향에 관한 연구", 노동법연구, (10), pp.180~ (2001), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 강성태, "포괄임금제의 노동법적 검토", 노동법연구, (26), pp.245~277 (2009), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 김재훈, "임금관련 제도의 유연안정화 법리", 노동법학, (22), pp.255~240 (2006), 한국노동법학회
- 김재훈, "포괄임금계약과 퇴직금의 지급등, in 1998 노동판례 비평", pp.162~ (1999), 민주사회를 위한 변호사모임
- 김지형, "노동쟁송과 판례연구", 인권과 정의, (319), pp.163~ (2003), 대한변호사협회
- 노동법실무연구회, , pp.158~ (2010), 박영사
- 임금제도 개편을 위한 노동법적 과제, "문무기", 한국노동연구원, 201~202 (2006)
- 문형배, "포괄임금계약과 근로기준법 제61조", 판례연구, 11, pp.714~ (2000), 부산판례연구회
- 박순영, "근로기준법상 근로시간의 규제와 포괄임금제", 대법원판례해설, (83), pp.813~815 (2010), 법원도서관
- 송명호, "포괄임금계약에 관한 고찰", 인권과 정의, (347), pp.57~82 (2005), 대한변호사협회
- 오문완, "임금체계의 개편방향", 한국노사관계학회 2000년 국제학술대회 발표자료, pp.13~14 (2000)
- 유승관, "감시단속적 근로와 포괄임금계약의 유효성", 재판실무연구, (1998), pp.258~ (1998), 광주지방법원
- 이원재, "포괄임금제에 의한 임금계약의 효력, in 1997 노동판례 비평", pp.152~ (1998), 민주사회를 위한 변호사모임
- 하갑래, "포괄임금제의 내용과 한계", 노동법학, (29), pp.325~362 (2009), 한국노동법학회