본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

관습법상 법정지상권에 관한 일고

A Study on the Statutory Superficies of Customary Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Korean Civil Law prescribes two kinds of statutory superficies. Korean Civil Law Article 305 stipulates that in a case where land with a building thereon belongs to one and the same person, and chonsegwon is created on the building, the limited successor in title of the land ownership, is deemed to have created legal superficies for the settlor of chonsegwon. Korean Civil Law Article 366 stipulates that, where the land and the building on it belong to different persons by reason of the auction sale of the mortgaged property, the owner of the land is deemed to have created a superficies for the owner of the building. In addition to these two kinds, the Korean Supreme Court recognizes another type of statutory superficies under the name of the statutory superficies of customary law. An owner of a building acquires such statutory superficies of customary law where a land and a building which used to be owned by the same person belong to different persons due to sale, auction, or other legal causes, of either land or building. Current legal superficies under customary system has affirmative function of socil, economic profit realization but got problem as well. The first, by theoretical grounds doubt about existence of customary. The second, cause insecure promote of trade safety. The third, by land usufruct produce a consequence of recognize only a superficies, be legal unfair both land and building owner about contract of land usufruct on existence and nonexistence of contracting. The Fourth, abuse possibility by fraudulent act. Finally, be estrange of general law awareness and phases of the times and so forth in nowadays.

Abstract

Korean Civil Law prescribes two kinds of statutory superficies. Korean Civil Law Article 305 stipulates that in a case where land with a building thereon belongs to one and the same person, and chonsegwon is created on the building, the limited successor in title of the land ownership, is deemed to have created legal superficies for the settlor of chonsegwon. Korean Civil Law Article 366 stipulates that, where the land and the building on it belong to different persons by reason of the auction sale of the mortgaged property, the owner of the land is deemed to have created a superficies for the owner of the building. In addition to these two kinds, the Korean Supreme Court recognizes another type of statutory superficies under the name of the statutory superficies of customary law. An owner of a building acquires such statutory superficies of customary law where a land and a building which used to be owned by the same person belong to different persons due to sale, auction, or other legal causes, of either land or building. Current legal superficies under customary system has affirmative function of socil, economic profit realization but got problem as well. The first, by theoretical grounds doubt about existence of customary. The second, cause insecure promote of trade safety. The third, by land usufruct produce a consequence of recognize only a superficies, be legal unfair both land and building owner about contract of land usufruct on existence and nonexistence of contracting. The Fourth, abuse possibility by fraudulent act. Finally, be estrange of general law awareness and phases of the times and so forth in nowadays.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김상현, "慣習上 法定地上權에 關한 考察 - 民法改正案 第279條의2에 對한 檢討를 中心으로 -", 법학연구, (36), pp.77~96 (2009), 한국법학회
  2. 이진기, "관습법상 법정지상권의 문제", 비교사법, 18(3), pp.773~814 (2011), 한국비교사법학회
  3. 법무부, "민법(재산편)개정자료집", 344~ (2004)
  4. 南潤鳳, "慣習法上의 法定地 上權", 漢陽法學, 16, pp.96~ (2004)
  5. 이영준, "物權法", pp.700~ (2009), 博英社
  6. "田地家舍買賣限十五日勿改並於百日內告官受立案", ~
  7. "京中造家地漢城府聽人狀告以空地及滿二年未造家之地折給", ~
  8. 관습조사보고서, "조선총독부", 41~ (1912)
  9. 배병일, "관습법상 법정지상권과 가압류", 저스티스, (129), pp.79~115 (2012), 한국법학원
  10. 조선총독부 중추원, "민사관습회답휘집", 24~ (1933)
  11. 배병일, "관습법상 법정지상권과 가압류", 저스티스, (129), pp.79~115 (2012), 한국법학원
  12. 권재문, "관습법상 법정지상권의 인정근거와 필요성에 관한 비판적 고찰", 법사학연구, (37), pp.99~127 (2008), 한국법사학회
  13. 김명수, "건물을 철거하고 그 지상에 새로운 건물을 신축하기로 하는 내용의 합의가 관습법상의 법정지상권의 발생을 배제하는 ‘철거의 특약’으로 볼 수 있는지 여부(소극)", 대법원판례해설, (34), pp.97~ (2000), 법원도서관
  14. 강신웅, "慣習法上 法定地上權에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (31), pp.97~118 (2008), 한국법학회
  15. 관습조사보고서, "정긍식", 186~
  16. 손주찬, "지상권에 관하여", 저스티스, 2(3), pp.12~ (1958)
  17. 이시윤, "판례를 중심으로 한 법정지상권", 법학, 14(1), pp.126~ (1973)
  18. 곽윤직, "민법주해Ⅶ", pp.333~334, 박영사
  19. 이은영, "법정지상권에 관한 연구, In 덕암 김병대교수 화갑기념논문집", pp.211~ (1998)
  20. 박우동, "관습법상 법정지상권, 그 문제점", 사법행정, 18(10), pp.14~ (1977)
  21. 박준서, "법정지상권", 사법논집, 5, pp.129~ (1972), 대법원 법원행정처
  22. 이은영, "물권법", pp.623~, 박영사
  23. 민의원 법제사법위원회, "민법안심의록 上卷", pp.191~ (1957)
  24. 幾代通, "新版 註釋民法(15) 債權(6)", pp.270~ (1989), 有斐閣
  25. 金曾漢, "신채권각론(민법강의Ⅵ),", pp.484~ (1960), 박영사
  26. 김현태, "채권각론", pp.81~ (1969), 일조각
  27. 곽윤직, "민법주해[ⅩⅤ]채권(8)", pp.112~ (1977), 박영사
  28. 金俊鎬, "民法의 休眠規定의 整備와 民法改正", 민사법학, (18), pp.141~142 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)