징벌적 손해배상제도의 법이론적 문제점과 그 극복방안
Legal-theoretical problems of ‘punitive damage’ and their remedy
0
조회
0
다운로드
28
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Punitive damage was introduced to Korea for the first time on March 29th 2011 through the amendment of ‘하도급거래의 공정화에 관한 법률’. On May 28th 2013, the amendment of the aforementioned legislation further extended the sphere of the punitive damage. Since then, there has been much debate in the assembly involving arguments for and against the adoption of this legislation into the ‘가맹사업공정화에 관한 법률’. Despite the general consent that punitive damage carries the advantage of deterring illegal conducts and protecting the economically weak, there are still much objection to the actual adoption or expansion of the application of the law. The main reason is that the punitive damage bears the characteristic of quasi-criminal sanction which contributes to the purpose of criminal law in the form of integration of the punishment of criminal law and compensatory damage of civil law. This paper intends to find measures that will allow punitive damage system to be established as an effective and valuable system in this country. For this purpose, the legal characteristic of punitive damage adopted in Korea is investigated. Next, the following improvement plans are proposed to remedy the shortcomings of the current punitive damage in Korea after examining the theoretical problems the legislation possesses:Firstly, the ‘severe negligence’ must be included in the legal requirement at the very least. Secondly, higher level of proof than the preponderance of evidence must be demanded. Thirdly, the subject that will receive compensation should include not only the victim, but also the state or public institutions.
Abstract
Punitive damage was introduced to Korea for the first time on March 29th 2011 through the amendment of ‘하도급거래의 공정화에 관한 법률’. On May 28th 2013, the amendment of the aforementioned legislation further extended the sphere of the punitive damage. Since then, there has been much debate in the assembly involving arguments for and against the adoption of this legislation into the ‘가맹사업공정화에 관한 법률’. Despite the general consent that punitive damage carries the advantage of deterring illegal conducts and protecting the economically weak, there are still much objection to the actual adoption or expansion of the application of the law. The main reason is that the punitive damage bears the characteristic of quasi-criminal sanction which contributes to the purpose of criminal law in the form of integration of the punishment of criminal law and compensatory damage of civil law. This paper intends to find measures that will allow punitive damage system to be established as an effective and valuable system in this country. For this purpose, the legal characteristic of punitive damage adopted in Korea is investigated. Next, the following improvement plans are proposed to remedy the shortcomings of the current punitive damage in Korea after examining the theoretical problems the legislation possesses:Firstly, the ‘severe negligence’ must be included in the legal requirement at the very least. Secondly, higher level of proof than the preponderance of evidence must be demanded. Thirdly, the subject that will receive compensation should include not only the victim, but also the state or public institutions.
참고문헌 (19)
- 이점인, "징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입 필요성과 가능성에 대한 일고찰", 동아법학, (38), pp.187~ (2006), 동아대학교 법학연구소
- 윤정환, "징벌적 손해배상에 관한 연구", 민사법학, (17), pp.58~ (1999), 한국민사법학회
- 정영수, "미국 징벌적 손해배상의 최근 동향", 법조, 54(11) (2005), 법조협회
- 김제완, "영국과 캐나다에서의 징벌적 배상 법리의 발전과정과 현황- 우리나라에서의 도입가능성 논의에 부쳐 -", 인권과 정의, (376), pp.101~124 (2007), 대한변호사협회
- 李命甲, "現代不法行爲法論에 관한 硏究", 박사, 법학, pp.1987
- 김성천, "징벌적 손해배상제도와 소비자피해구제" (2003), 한국소비자보호원
- Oetker, "Muenchender Kommentar zum BGB" (2007)
- 황찬현, "손해배상책임에 관한 현행법의 규정과 입법론적 검토", 정보법학, (3), pp.331~ (1993), 한국정보법학회
- 징벌적 민사제재에 관한 연구, "윤동호", 한국형사정책연구원, 138~ (2004)
- Steven H. Thal, "US-Punitive Damages: Nicht mehr so schlimm!. Rechtsprechung entschaerft das Schadensersatzrisiko", Zur Information, Phillips Nizer, (8) (2011)
- 이승호, "형벌로서의 배상제도에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, (7), pp.191~ (1999), 한국피해자학회
- 김성돈, "원상회복의 형사제재로서의 적격성과 형법이 과제", 피해자학연구, (5), pp.126~ (1997)
- 최정학, "기업범죄와 징벌적 손해배상", 민주법학, (42), pp.271~300 (2010), 민주주의법학연구회
- 이명갑, "불법행위법상의 민·형사책임의 분리의 배경과 그 기능의 검토", 사법행정, pp.55~ (1985)
- Ina Ebert, "Poenale Element im Privatrecht" (2004)
- 홍명수, "공정거래법상 징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입에 관한 검토", 성균관법학, 20(2), pp.521~538 (2008), 법학연구소
- 배병호, "환경분쟁 해결을 위한 징벌적 손해배상제도 도입에 관한 고찰", 환경법연구, 35(1), pp.107~133 (2013), 한국환경법학회
- 오문완, "징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입 -노동법에서의 논의를 시작하며-", 노동법연구, 13, pp.12~442 (2002), 서울대학교노동법연구회
