본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

시장, 제도, 그리고 신공공관리 관점의 Charter School 성장요인에 관한 연구: 미국 플로리다주 Charter School을 중심으로

Charter School Growth in Florida through Market, Institution, and New Public Management Perspective

강인성
한국공공관리학회 (Korean Association for Public Management)|2019.12|한국공공관리학보 (Korean Public Management Review)|제33권 제4호|pp. 1-25|DOI 10.24210/kapm.2019.33.4.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

제도시장New Public ManagementInstitutionMarket신공공관리론차터스쿨Charter School
주제분류사회과학일반

초록

미국 플로리다주의 차터스쿨은 가장 빠르게 성장하는 공교육 혁신모델중의 하나이다. 그럼에도 불구하고 지금까지 차터스쿨의 성장과 관련된 요인에 대해서는 거의 알려져 있지 않다. 이런 맥락에서 이 연구는 플로리다에 있는 차터스쿨의 성장에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 신공공관리론을 통해 차터스쿨의 다양한 부분을 이해하고자 노력하였고, 그 후 시장과 제도이론을 차터스쿨 성장에 적용하는 이론적 분석틀을 마련하였다. 경험적 분석을 위해 2006-2007학년도부터 2012-2013학년도까지 37개 교육구의 패널 자료를 수집 및 분석을 통해 학교와 학생, 교육구, 외부 학교공동체 등 차터스쿨의 다양한 측면에서 살펴보았다. 시장과 제도적 틀에 기초한 실증적 분석 결과, 차터스쿨 성장과 관련된 네 가지 중요한 요인들을 발견할 수 있었다. 시장이론과 관련해서는 무상급식비율과 학생1인당 교육비 지출이 영향을 미쳤고, 제도이론과 관련해서는 학급규모와 학령아동 빈곤율이 중요하게 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 연구의 함의는 신공공관리론 측면의 시장과 제도적 이론은 적합한 접근법이며, 차터스쿨 성장의 많은 부분을 설명한다. 또한 이 이론들은 차터스쿨 형성의 이론적 배경을 이해하고 차터스쿨 성장에 관련된 요소들을 인식하기 위한 유용한 연구 프레임워크를 제공한다.

Abstract

Charter schools in Florida have been the fastest growing school choice. Little is known about the factors that are related to the growth of charter schools. This study attempted to clarify factors influencing the growth of charter schools in Florida. In doing so, first, we tried to understand diverse parts of charter school through NPM, and then recognized market and institutional theory as underlying theoretical frame of charter school growth. We examined diverse aspects of charter schools including school and student, school district, and school community by analyzing panel data from the school years 2006-2007 to 2012-2013 in 37 school districts. As a result of empirical analysis based on market and institutional framework, we found four significant factors related to charter school growth: Free Reduced Lunch and expenditure for FTE (Market Theory Category); class size and school-aged children in poverty (Institutional Theory Category). Market and institutional theory in new public management are relevant approach and explain many parts of the charter school growth. These theories provide useful research framework to understand theoretical background of charter school formation as well as recognize the relevant factors to charter school growth. Free reduced lunch eligible and school-aged children in poverty are important to explain charter school growth. Student welfare support and school surrounding environment are more important than educational performance or student composition in charter school growth.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Arsen, D., "The Effects of Charter School Competition on School District Resource Allocation", Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), pp.3~38 (2012)
  2. 2015 Legislative Report on the Postsecondary Progress and Success of High School Graduates, "Bautsch, B.", Colorado Department of Higher Education, ~ (2015)
  3. Berends, M., "Instructional Conditions in Charter Schools and Students’Mathematics Achievement Gains", American Journal of Education, 116(3), pp.303~335 (2010)
  4. Bidwell, C. E., "Public and Private Education: Conceptualizing the Distinction", Journal of Catholic Education, 7(1) (2003)
  5. The Influence of Finance and Accountability Policies on Charter School Locations, "Bifulco, R.", Syracuse University, ~ (2012)
  6. Kevin Booker, "The Effects of Charter High Schools on Educational Attainment", Journal of Labor Economics, 29(2), pp.377~415 (2011), University of Chicago Press[DOI]
  7. Bryk, A. S., "Organizing Schools for Improvement", Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), pp.23~30 (2010)
  8. Carruthers, C. K., "New Schools, New Students, New Teachers: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Charter Schools", Economics of Education Review, 31(2), pp.280~292 (2012)
  9. Chubb, J. E., "Politics, Markets, and America's Schools" (2011), Brookings Institution Press
  10. Crew, R. E., "Accountability and Performance in Charter Schools in Florida: A Theory-based Evaluation", American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2), pp.189~212 (2003)
  11. Davies, S., "The Impact of Sector on School Organizations: Institutional and Market Logics", Sociology of Education, 80(1), pp.66~89 (2007)
  12. Dee, T. S., "Competition and The Quality of Public Schools", Economics of Education review, 17(4), pp.419~427 (1998)
  13. Dee, T. S., "Do Charter Schools Skim Students or Drain Resources?", Economics of Education Review, 23(3), pp.259~271 (2004)
  14. DiMaggio, P., "The Iron Cage Revisited: Collective Rationality and Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields", American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp.147~160 (1983)
  15. Education Week, "Obama’s Second Term: What’s Ahead for Education Policy" (2013), Editorial Projects in Education
  16. The Decline in Private School Enrollment, "Ewert, S.", SEHSD, ~, pp.SEHSD Working Paper Number FY11 (2013), 117
  17. Farazmand, A., "Handbook of Globalization, Governance and Public Administration" (2006), CRC Press
  18. Feiock, R. S., "Private Interests and Public Schools: Charter School Formation in Florida", pp.2015
  19. Finn Jr., "Charter Schools in Action: Renewing Public Education" (2001), Princeton University Press
  20. "Class Size" (2015)[URL]
  21. "About Florida’s Charter Schools" (2015)[URL]
  22. Florida Legislature, "The 2012 Florida Statute Title XLVIII: Chapter 1002 STUDENT AND PARENTAL RIGHTS AND EDUCATIONAL CHOICES", ~ (2012)
  23. How Charter School Funding Compares. Research Report, "Florida Tax Watch", ~ (2012)
  24. Friedman, M., "Capitalism and freedom" (1962), University of Chicago
  25. Fusarelli, L. D., "Educational Governance and the New public Management", Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 9(2), pp.118~127 (2004)
  26. Glomm, G., "Charter School Location", Economics of Education Review, 24(4), pp.451~457 (2005)
  27. Henig, J. R., "Locational Decisions of Charter Schools: Probing the Market Metaphor", Social Science Quarterly, 83(4), pp.962~980 (2002)
  28. School Boards Circa 2010: Governance in the Accountability Era, "Hess, F. M.", Thomas B. Fordham Institute, ~ (2010)
  29. Does School Choice Increase School Quality?, "Holmes, G. M.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.No. w9683 (2003)
  30. Would School Choice Change the Teaching Profession?, "Hoxby, C.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.No. w7866 (2000)
  31. 강인성, "Multilevel Analysis of School and District on Charter School Size in Florida:Using Hierarchical Linear Model", 한국공공관리학보, 31(4), pp.269~296 (2017), 한국공공관리학회[DOI]
  32. Kaufman, R., "What Can Business Learn from Education? Who Should Be Benchmarking Whom?", International Journal of Educational Reform, 7, pp.13~19 (1998)
  33. Kettl, D. F., "The Global Public Management Revolution. A Report on the Transformation of Governace" (2000), Brookings Institution Press
  34. Kraft, M. E., "Public policy: Politics, Analysis and Alternatives" (2007), Cq Press
  35. "Response to Market Threats: How Michigan Public Schools React to a Growing School Choice Movement" (2011)[URL]
  36. Meyer, J. W., "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony", American journal of sociology, 83(2), pp.340~363 (1977)
  37. Meyer, J. W., "Discourse formation in comparative education", pp.111~132 (2000)
  38. What Makes KIPP work? A Study of Student Characteristics, Attrition, and School Finance, "Miron, G.", Western Michigan University, ~ (2011)
  39. Moe, T. M., "Political Control and the Power of the Agent", Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(1), pp.1~29 (2006)
  40. Murphy, J., "Has Marketization Improved the Quality of Education? The Case of Charter Schools", Journal of Educational Change, 4(1), pp.72~80 (2003)
  41. National Alliance of Public Charter Schools, "Estimated Number of Public Charter Schools & Students", ~ (2015)
  42. Nelson, F. H., "Venturesome Capital: State Charter School Finance Systems" (2000), National Charter School Finance Study
  43. Peters, B. G., "The Future of Governing" (2001), University Press of Kansas
  44. Pfiffner, J. P., "The Future of Merit: Twenty Years after the Civil Service Reform Act", pp.15~38 (2000), Woodrow Wilson Center Press
  45. Pfiffner, J. P., "The National Performance Review in Perspective", International Journal of Public Administration, 20(1), pp.41~70 (1997)
  46. Renzulli, L. A., "Charter School Policy, Implementation, and Diffusion across the United States", Sociology of Education, 78(4), pp.344~366 (2005)
  47. Rowan, B., "Handbook of Research on Educational Administration. 2", pp.359~383 (1999)
  48. Ruble, W., "To Charter or Not to Charter: Developing a Testable Model of Charter Authorization and Renewal Decisions", Journal of School Choice, 8(3), pp.362~380 (2014)
  49. Sass, T. R., "Charter Schools and Student Achievement in Florida", Education, 1(1), pp.91~122 (2006)
  50. Does Class Size Matter, "Schanzenbach, D. W.", National Education Policy Center, ~ (2014)
  51. Schneider, M., "The Competitive City: The Political Economy of Suburbia" (1989), University of Pittsburgh Press
  52. Schwenkenberg, J., "Why Do Charter Schools Fail? An Analysis of Charter School Survival in New Jersey", Contemporary Economic Policy, 33(2), pp.300~314 (2015)
  53. Scott, W. R., "Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests" (2008), Sage
  54. Scott, W. R., "Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives" (2007), Prentice Hall
  55. Scott, W. R., "Institutions and Organizations. Vol. 2" (1995), Sage
  56. Suchman, M. C., "The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies", pp.39~63 (1995)
  57. Terry, L. D., "Leadership of Public Bureaucracies" (2002), M.E. Sharpe
  58. "Survey of America’s Charter Schools 2014" (2014)[URL]
  59. "Charter School Laws Across the States 2015 Rankings & Scorecard" (2015)[URL]
  60. Thompson, J. R., "The Management Reform Agenda, 2001-2010: a Report to the PriceWaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government", International Public Management Journal, 4(2), pp.151~172 (2001)
  61. Toma, E. F., "Beyond Achievement: Enrollment Consequences of Charter Schools in Michigan", Advances in Applied Microeconomics, 14(2), pp.241~255 (2006)
  62. "In D.C. schools, 59 percent of students get diploma on time" (2012)[URL]
  63. Walberg, H. J., "Market Theory of School Choice", Education Week, 19, pp.46~49 (2000)
  64. Zhang, Y., "What Drives Charter School Diffusion at the Local Level:Educational Needs or Political and Institutional Forces?", Policy studies journal, 36(4), pp.571~591 (2008)
  65. Zimmer, R., "Is Charter School Competition in California Improving the Performance of Traditional Public Schools?", Public Administration Review, 69(5), pp.831~845 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

Panel Data Analysis of Charter School Growth in Florida : Based on School, School District, and School Community Model강인성(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2017 · 제31권 제4호위계선형모형을 이용한 Charter School 규모 결정요인에 관한 연구: 미국 플로리다주 Charter School을 중심으로강인성(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2016 · 제30권 제2호Multilevel Analysis of School and District on Charter School Size in Florida:Using Hierarchical Linear Model강인성한국공공관리학회 · 한국공공관리학보2017 · 제31권 제4호Do Political Institutions Matter to Education Policy?: Lessons from Charter School Growth in the United States박종선, 조기웅한국디지털정책학회 · 디지털융복합연구2021 · 제19권 제12호Explanatory Factors for the Uneven Implementation of Charter School Policy이정호, 정진우서울대학교행정대학원 · Journal of Policy Studies2012 · 제27권 제1호Explaining Mechanisms of Charter School Policy Implementation: Ostrom’s IAD Framework이정호국가정책연구소 · 국가정책연구2019 · 제33권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

지방정부 공유재산의 효율적 관리방안: 경북 사례를 중심으로강황묵, 남창우pp. 27-58공무원의 자기효능감이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 직무열의의 매개효과를 중심으로유병규, 이영균pp. 59-77대학이 지역주민의 자긍심에 미치는 영향정준재, 이대희pp. 79-99인구구성 변화에 따른 지방의원 다양성과 대표성 연구: 경기도 지방의원을 중심으로김정인pp. 101-126사회복지 일선관료의 재량에 관한 연구: 법률의 모호성과 집행환경의 특수성을 중심으로설선미, 심미승, 박애리pp. 127-144
원문 보기