김소월 「시혼」의 理氣論的 고찰
A study on Kim, So-Wol's poetics Sihon(詩魂) with Liki(理氣)philosophy
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at clarifying that Kim, So-Wol's poetics is based on LiKi(理氣)philosophy. And this is to show the distinction between Western ideas like Romanticism which is accepted by Kim-uk and So-Wol's traditional poetics. The results are as follows. First, So-Wol is realized paradoxical sense which can find out positive meaning from negative thing and overcome Western dichotomy by LiKijimyo(理氣之妙) principal means that Li(理) as Hyungisanja(形而上者: metaphysical thing) and Ki(氣) as Hyungihaja (形而下者: physical thing)are neither divided nor united. Second, So-Wol emphasizes that immutable character of Sihon(詩魂) on his poetics because he wants to show Li's character as inevitable cause and right. As he authorizes Sihon(詩魂) ontological and axiological character of Li, Sihon(詩魂) has Good truth and thereby has good effect for society. Unlike Kim-uk's romanticism,to display subjectivity on So-Wol's poetics is based on LiKi philosophy has a effect for society, because the subjectivity has a moral sensibility. Last, like Li and Ki, Sihon(詩魂) is manifested on poetry by Umyoung(陰影), so poetry is valuated by not Sihon but Umyoung. But So-Wol contradicted himself by asserting that Umyoung(陰影)isn't discussed merits and demerits. This is explained by considering LiKijimyo(理氣之妙). Ki is a manifestation of Li,therefore when we see poetry as Ki with view is based on authenticity, Ki is not a thing of judgement. But when we poetry with view is based on substantiality, Ki is a thing of judgement. In conclusion, So-Wol intended to include not only eternal nature but also substantiality on modern poetry with LiKi(理氣) philosophy.
Abstract
This study aims at clarifying that Kim, So-Wol's poetics is based on LiKi(理氣)philosophy. And this is to show the distinction between Western ideas like Romanticism which is accepted by Kim-uk and So-Wol's traditional poetics. The results are as follows. First, So-Wol is realized paradoxical sense which can find out positive meaning from negative thing and overcome Western dichotomy by LiKijimyo(理氣之妙) principal means that Li(理) as Hyungisanja(形而上者: metaphysical thing) and Ki(氣) as Hyungihaja (形而下者: physical thing)are neither divided nor united. Second, So-Wol emphasizes that immutable character of Sihon(詩魂) on his poetics because he wants to show Li's character as inevitable cause and right. As he authorizes Sihon(詩魂) ontological and axiological character of Li, Sihon(詩魂) has Good truth and thereby has good effect for society. Unlike Kim-uk's romanticism,to display subjectivity on So-Wol's poetics is based on LiKi philosophy has a effect for society, because the subjectivity has a moral sensibility. Last, like Li and Ki, Sihon(詩魂) is manifested on poetry by Umyoung(陰影), so poetry is valuated by not Sihon but Umyoung. But So-Wol contradicted himself by asserting that Umyoung(陰影)isn't discussed merits and demerits. This is explained by considering LiKijimyo(理氣之妙). Ki is a manifestation of Li,therefore when we see poetry as Ki with view is based on authenticity, Ki is not a thing of judgement. But when we poetry with view is based on substantiality, Ki is a thing of judgement. In conclusion, So-Wol intended to include not only eternal nature but also substantiality on modern poetry with LiKi(理氣) philosophy.
참고문헌 (27)
- 권영민, "김소월 시전집" (2007), 문학사상사
- 박경수, "안서김억전집5 문예비평집" (1987), 한국문화사
- 김윤식, "한국문학사" (1973), 민음사
- 김흥규, "문학과 역사적 인간" (1980), 창작과 비평사
- 송욱, "문학평전" (1975), 일조각
- 신동욱, "김소월" (1980), 문학과 지성사
- 신명경, "한국 낭만주의 문학론" (2003), 새문사
- 오세영, "김소월, 그 삶과 문학" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 윤영해, "주자의선불교비판 연구" (2000), 민족사
- 유명종, "조선후기 성리학" (1985), 이문출판사
- 이동준, "栗谷學硏究叢書 논문편2" (2007), 사단법인율곡학회
- 이승훈, "한국현대시론사" (1993), 고려원
- 조동일, "한국문학사상사시론" (1982), 지식산업사
- 한국사상사연구회, "인성물성론" (1994), 한길사
- 한국사상사연구회, "조선유학의 개념들" (2002), 예문서원
- 한국현대시학회, "20세기 한국시론1" (2006), 글누림
- 김헌선, "양명학적 개념으로 본 김소월의 <시혼>-자생적 낭만주의의 원천탐색", 어문집, 34 (1994), 경기대학교연구교류처
- 박경수, "천기론(天機論)의 관점에서 본 김소월의 시학의 전통성과 근대성", 우리말글, (32), pp.273~310 (2004), 우리말글학회
- 박현수, "1920년대 동인지의 ‘영혼’과 ‘화원’의 의미", 어문학, (90), pp.555~578 (2005), 한국어문학회
- 엄홍화, "김소월의 시론연구", 문예시학, 20 (2009), 문예시학회
- 염철, "김소월 詩魂 고찰", 어문논집, 27 (1999), 중앙어문학회
- 정순진, "소월 시론고-시경론과의 관련을 중심으로-", 語文論志, 6 (1990), 忠南大學校 文理科大學 國語國文學科
- 정용환, "성리학적 본체-쓰임의 관계에서 표현의 역할", 철학연구, 95, pp.347~370 (2005), 대한철학회
- 조기영, "율곡의 시문학관(1)", 율곡사상연구, 16 (2008)
- 조동일, "이기철학의 전통과 국문학 이론의 새로운 방향", 한국학논집, 1 (1980), 계명대학교 한국학연구소
- 조창환, "소월시의 구조-한국근대시의 전통리듬 계승에 관한 연구", (91) (1984)
- 황갑연, "유가철학에 있어서 文과 道의 관계에 관한 연구 : 주자의 理氣論을 통해서 본 文과 道의 관계를 중심으로", 범한철학, 36(1), pp.181~210 (2005), 범한철학회
