본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

서정주 초기시의 근대성 재론 -‘육체’와 ‘직정언어’의 문제를 중심으로

Rethinking the Modernity of Seo Jeongju's Early Poems -Focused on the Problem of 'Body' and 'Chikjung-language'

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper aimed to examine Seo Jeongju's early poems in terms of colonial context. Especially, I examined the problems of 'Body' and 'Chikjung-language'(직정언어), the poetic diction of directly expressing the emotion in his poetry at the end of the Japanese colonial period. In this study, I adopted the viewpoint of Im Hwa(임화), who in the Marxist perspective had demanded the unity of lyrical poem and the colonial reality. Seo Jeongju had to face the irrational reality of the colonial modernity in the political, cultural conditions in the 1930s. He didn't have any means to confront himself with the reality but his (naked) body, because the late 1930s is the period when the interpreting the world in terms of ideology or enjoying the sensuous world couldn't be accepted any more. Seo Jeongju expressed the pose of hypocrisy in his Decadence poetry. But, his hypocritical pause didn't stand on the morally sound base. Though he declared his intention to separate from the pre-modern, ethical order, and began to express aesthetical morality in his poem "Self-portrait(자화상)", he could not find the passage to return to the reality. On his poem, "Sudaedongsi(수대동시)" written in 1938, Seo Jeongju began to accept the ethical distortion. He selected the order of the ethic(Sittlich) order instead of aesthetic subject negating the colonial modern reality. This ethical distortion made him write pro-Japanese poetry where the poetic-self descended into the totalistic ethics, in other word the pseudo-Sittlichkeit. That was the finding the way he could reach the eternity as a poetic vision in the greater self represented by family, nation, and state. In this process, he selected the "dialect" instead of 'Chikjung-language'. In his poetry, the "dialect" and "Korean language" are the languages which had the destiny to be assimilated to or to be governed by the language of the Japanese Imperial. So, we can say that Seo Jeongju's distortion of language consciousness is connected with the ethical distortion, the sublating the subjective and aesthetic morality into the pseudo-Sittlichkeit.

Abstract

This paper aimed to examine Seo Jeongju's early poems in terms of colonial context. Especially, I examined the problems of 'Body' and 'Chikjung-language'(직정언어), the poetic diction of directly expressing the emotion in his poetry at the end of the Japanese colonial period. In this study, I adopted the viewpoint of Im Hwa(임화), who in the Marxist perspective had demanded the unity of lyrical poem and the colonial reality. Seo Jeongju had to face the irrational reality of the colonial modernity in the political, cultural conditions in the 1930s. He didn't have any means to confront himself with the reality but his (naked) body, because the late 1930s is the period when the interpreting the world in terms of ideology or enjoying the sensuous world couldn't be accepted any more. Seo Jeongju expressed the pose of hypocrisy in his Decadence poetry. But, his hypocritical pause didn't stand on the morally sound base. Though he declared his intention to separate from the pre-modern, ethical order, and began to express aesthetical morality in his poem "Self-portrait(자화상)", he could not find the passage to return to the reality. On his poem, "Sudaedongsi(수대동시)" written in 1938, Seo Jeongju began to accept the ethical distortion. He selected the order of the ethic(Sittlich) order instead of aesthetic subject negating the colonial modern reality. This ethical distortion made him write pro-Japanese poetry where the poetic-self descended into the totalistic ethics, in other word the pseudo-Sittlichkeit. That was the finding the way he could reach the eternity as a poetic vision in the greater self represented by family, nation, and state. In this process, he selected the "dialect" instead of 'Chikjung-language'. In his poetry, the "dialect" and "Korean language" are the languages which had the destiny to be assimilated to or to be governed by the language of the Japanese Imperial. So, we can say that Seo Jeongju's distortion of language consciousness is connected with the ethical distortion, the sublating the subjective and aesthetic morality into the pseudo-Sittlichkeit.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 서정주, "시의 이야기-주로 국민시가에 대하여", 매일신보, ~ (1942), 1942.7.13-17.
  2. 서정주, "서정주문학전집 1~5" (1972), 일지사
  3. 임 화, "임화문학예술전집2~5" (2009), 소명출판사
  4. 김용직, "한국현대시사 2" (1996), 한국문연
  5. 김진희, "생명파 시의 모더니티" (2003), 새미
  6. 나종석, "근대적 가족 제도에 대한 헤겔의 윤리적 정당화에 관하여", 동서철학연구, (34), pp.29~55 (2004), 한국동서철학회
  7. 남기혁, "정지용 중·후기시에 나타난 풍경과 시선, 재현의 문제 - 식민지적 근대와 시선의 계보학(4)", 국어문학, 47(47), pp.111~148 (2009), 국어문학회
  8. 남기혁, "임화 시에 나타난 근대 풍경과 이념적 시선의 변모과정 - 식민지적 근대와 시선의 계보학(3)", 한국시학연구, (23), pp.153~191 (2008), 한국시학회
  9. 남기혁, "서정주의 동양 인식과 친일의 논리", 국제어문, (37), pp.91~125 (2006), 국제어문학회
  10. 박민규, "衛生의 근대와 生命派:서정주와 오장환의 시", 한국근대문학연구, 1(20), pp.211~240 (2009), 한국근대문학회
  11. 오세영, "20세기 한국시 연구" (1988), 새문사
  12. 오세영, "한국현대시인연구" (2003), 월인
  13. 이미순, "오장환 시에서의 '고향'의 의미화 과정 연구", 한국시학연구, (17), pp.101~122 (2006), 한국시학회
  14. 이인영, "전통의 시적 전유- 서정주의 ‘신라정신’을 중심으로 -", 동방학지, (146), pp.273~304 (2009), 국학연구원
  15. 이종철, "예나 시기 헤겔의 ‘인륜성’에 관한 연구 - 예나 초기 저작들을 중심으로 -", 사회와 철학, (18), pp.457~492 (2009), 한국사회와철학연구회
  16. 임수만, "1920년대 데카당스 문학 연구", 국어국문학, (145), pp.287~318 (2007), 국어국문학회
  17. 임홍빈, "칸트의 도덕성 개념에 대한 헤겔의 비판은 과연 정당한가?", 철학, 35, pp.163~188 (1990), 한국철학회
  18. 정지용, "정지용전집2-산문" (1988), 민음사
  19. 조극훈, "도덕성과 인륜성 칸트 실천철학에 대한 헤겔의 비판", 칸트연구, 9, pp.181~203 (2002), 한국칸트학회
  20. 최현식, "서정주 시의 근대와 반근대" (2003), 소명
  21. 허윤회, "서정주 초기시의 극적 성격-니체와의 관련을 중심으로", 상허학보, 21, pp.140~157 (2007), 상허학회
  22. Bohrer, K. H, "절대적 현존" (1998), 문학동네

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)