주취자 보호에 있어서 경찰관 면책권의 도입방안
A study on the introduction of police immunity in the protection of drunken people
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Drunken people problem has basically two aspects. The first is the protection of drunken people. And the second is the punishment for drunken people who committed criminal offenses. Drunken people can be a victim of crime such as the theft and traffic accidents. Also drunken people can be the perpetrators of the assault. 21)But there are no rules that can handle properly the drunken people in the current Police Duty Enforcement Act. As a result, policeman is bound to respond negatively to escape their liability in the treatment of drunken people. There are two problems in the passive response to the drunken people. First, the lack of crime prevention and public authority is weakening. The second is the production of criminals. If policeman leave the drunk people, they commit crimes. So ex-convict can be mass-produced. To solve these problems, policeman's immunity should be given. And then policeman can handle drunken people problems aggressively. Therefore, indemnity provisions should be introduced such as exemption for the use of weapons, exemption for the use of equipments, exemption for personal injury, exemption for damages. But policeman's immunity should be recognized in the absence of intention or gross negligence.
Abstract
Drunken people problem has basically two aspects. The first is the protection of drunken people. And the second is the punishment for drunken people who committed criminal offenses. Drunken people can be a victim of crime such as the theft and traffic accidents. Also drunken people can be the perpetrators of the assault. 21)But there are no rules that can handle properly the drunken people in the current Police Duty Enforcement Act. As a result, policeman is bound to respond negatively to escape their liability in the treatment of drunken people. There are two problems in the passive response to the drunken people. First, the lack of crime prevention and public authority is weakening. The second is the production of criminals. If policeman leave the drunk people, they commit crimes. So ex-convict can be mass-produced. To solve these problems, policeman's immunity should be given. And then policeman can handle drunken people problems aggressively. Therefore, indemnity provisions should be introduced such as exemption for the use of weapons, exemption for the use of equipments, exemption for personal injury, exemption for damages. But policeman's immunity should be recognized in the absence of intention or gross negligence.
참고문헌 (34)
- 경찰청, "공무집행방해 대응 매뉴얼" (2008), 경찰청
- 곽대경, "주취자처리제도의 개선을 위한 보호법안의 필요성", 한국공안행정학회보, (19), pp.175~210 (2005), 한국공안행정학회
- 곽병선, "보호조치의 문제점 및 개선방안", 지역발전연구, 7(1), pp.25~48 (2007)
- 권형준, "國會議員의 免責特權에 관한 考察", 법학논총, 24(4), pp.9~26 (2007), 법학연구소
- 김동희, "행정법 Ⅰ" (2009), 박영사
- 김수갑, "의원의 면책특권", 법학연구, 17(1), pp.103~146 (2006)
- 김진숙, "체포행위의 적법성과 공무집행방해죄", 청연논총, 6, pp.163~194 (2009)
- 문장일, "유럽경찰의 조직과 권한", 공법학연구, 6(3), pp.3~26 (2005), 한국비교공법학회
- 박달현, "재량권남용과 공무집행방해죄", 안암법학, 10, pp.115~134 (1999)
- 박봉진, "경찰관에 대한 공무집행방해죄에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, (20), pp.415~435 (2005), 한국법학회
- 박영규, "공무집행방해죄에 있어서의 직무집행의 적법성", 사법행정, 326, pp.68~74 (1988)
- 신동운, "국회의원의 면책특권과 그 형사법적 효과", 법학, pp.204~221 (1992)
- 이금옥, "국회의원 면책특권의 범위와 한계 그리고 개선방안", 법제연구, (33), pp.263~288 (2007), 한국법제연구원
- 이만종, "주취자 보호법 제정 법안에 관한 보완적 고찰", 한국경찰학회보, 11(1), pp.5~28 (2009), 한국경찰학회
- 이상훈, "공무집행방해사범에 대한 공권력 확보방안*", 한국공안행정학회보, 18(1), pp.235~271 (2009), 한국공안행정학회
- 이영란, "공무집행방해죄에 관한 고찰", 진주산업대학교논문집, 2, pp.43~62 (1983)
- 유럽연합의 형사법체제에 관한 연구, "이진국", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
- 이형국, "공무집행방해죄에 있어서의 직무집행의 범위와 적법성", 연세행정논총, 27, pp.181~194 (2002)
- 이호용, "주취자 처리의 실태와 법적 접근", 법학연구, 17(2), pp.285~315 (2009), 법학연구소
- 이호용, "효과적인 주취자 처리를 위한 법제 개선 방안", 법학논총, 33(2), pp.427~459 (2009), 법학연구소
- 장석헌, "주취자보호법의 제정방향", 사회과학연구, 10(3), pp.983~998 (2005)
- 전승수, "미국의 면책조건부 증언취득제도", 김유정, 116, pp.234~275 (2005)
- 정주영, "공무집행방해죄에 있어서의 직무집행의 적법성", 사회과학논총, 4, pp.83~104 (1988)
- 조성기, "주취자 보호프로그램의 나아갈 길", 건강생활, (65) (2009)
- 조준현, "공무집행방해죄에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구, 30, pp.61~94 (1997)
- 최병각, "조직범죄수사의 협조자에 대한 양형과 형사면책", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.20~514 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 최윤철, "국회의원의 면책특권의 보호범위에 관한 연구 : 특히 명예훼손죄와의 관계를 중심으로", 법학연구, (11), pp.345~364 (2002), 한국법학회
- 화순경찰서, "공무집행방해사범 유형별 대처방안" (2007), 화순경찰서
- Collins, J. J., "Alcohol and Interpersonal Violence, in Pathways to Criminal Violence" (1989), Sage
- Gillham, Patrick F., "Complexity and Irony in Policing and Protesting: The Word Trade Organization in Seattle", Social Justice, 27(2), pp.212~236 (2000)
- James B. Jacobs, "Drunk Driving: An American Dilemma" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
- Mayfield, D., "Alcoholism, Alcohol, Intoxication and Assaultive Behavior", Diseases of the Nervous System, 37, pp.288~291 (1976)
- Nielsen A. L., "Reassessing the Alcohol-Violence Linkage:Result from a Multiethnic City", Justice quarterly, 20(3)
- Tinklenberg, J. R., "Alcohol and Violence, in Alcoholism" (1973), Academic Press