한국 갯벌 생태 등급도의 개발 필요성과 방향
Development Needs and Direction of an Ecological Grading System of Korean Tidal Flats
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is a host of habitat assessment systems available to evaluate and grade tidal flat ecosystems in Korea. Nevertheless, we recognize the need to develop a better ecological scheme to improve reliability and accuracy given the importance of using an empirical approach in assigning grades to indicators and the limitation of current systems which evaluate tidal flats on a regional basis. A preferable system would be one that enables habitat mapping within a tidal flat, provides a diagnosis of ecological stress/health, has a high level of ecological relevance, communicability, and statistical robustness, and enables evaluation of diverse habitats within a tidal flat. The following points should be considered in framing such a system. Indicators should discriminate habitat quality into five to seven grades accomodating diverse characteristics and conservation value of a habitat, and the grading should be made from frequency distribution of indicators based on nationwide data.We suggest the following tasks in crafting such a system: i) The decision on selection of indicators should be made based on accuracy of assessment and practical application; ⅱ) effects of physical habitat conditions on variability of indicators should be reflected; and, ⅲ) further works on stress/health indicators should be addressed for adopting a multiple-indicator approach which reduces misdiagnosis.
Abstract
There is a host of habitat assessment systems available to evaluate and grade tidal flat ecosystems in Korea. Nevertheless, we recognize the need to develop a better ecological scheme to improve reliability and accuracy given the importance of using an empirical approach in assigning grades to indicators and the limitation of current systems which evaluate tidal flats on a regional basis. A preferable system would be one that enables habitat mapping within a tidal flat, provides a diagnosis of ecological stress/health, has a high level of ecological relevance, communicability, and statistical robustness, and enables evaluation of diverse habitats within a tidal flat. The following points should be considered in framing such a system. Indicators should discriminate habitat quality into five to seven grades accomodating diverse characteristics and conservation value of a habitat, and the grading should be made from frequency distribution of indicators based on nationwide data.We suggest the following tasks in crafting such a system: i) The decision on selection of indicators should be made based on accuracy of assessment and practical application; ⅱ) effects of physical habitat conditions on variability of indicators should be reflected; and, ⅲ) further works on stress/health indicators should be addressed for adopting a multiple-indicator approach which reduces misdiagnosis.
참고문헌 (40)
- 국립환경연구원, "제2차 전국 자연환경 조사지침: 해안지역. 국립환경연구원", 33~ (2004)
- 습지보호지역 지정체계 개선과 후보지 평가 연구, "국토해양부", 국토해양부, 89~ (2008)
- 해양생태계기본조사: 서해남부(35.5oN 영광~34.5oN 진도), "국토해양부", 국토해양부, 692~, pp.11-1611000-00444-10 (2009)
- 김영옥, "연안해역 생태계 건강성 평가의 의미와 국내 적용 방향", Ocean and Polar Research, 29(4), pp.319~326 (2007), 한국해양연구원
- 백상규, "우리나라 서？남해안에서 출현하는 다모류를 통한해역의 생태등급 산정", 한국습지학회지, 7(2), pp.89~104 (2005), 한국습지학회
- 이재학, "저서오염지수(BPI)를 이용한 시화호 환경평가", Ocean and Polar Research, 25(2), pp.183~200 (2003), 한국해양연구원
- 이창근, "인천 갯벌의 생태적 가치평가와 저서생물에 의한 정화기능의 가치", 박사, pp.2009
- 임현식, "해양 저서동물 군집을 이용한 진해만의 환경 평가: 종별 개체수 분포 특성에 따른 그래프 분석기법의 적용", 한수지, 27, pp.659~672 (1994)
- 장진호, "보호지역 지정을 위한 갯벌의 평가기준 개발과 전남 지역갯벌의 평가", 한국환경과학회지, 17(12), pp.1391~1402 (2008), 한국환경과학회
- 갯벌 생태계 조사 및 지속가능한 이용방안 연구, "해양수산부", 해양수산부, 1130~, pp.BSPM221-00-1610-3 (2003)
- 대체습지조성 중장기 계획 수립용역(II), "해양수산부", 해양수산부, 396~, pp.BSPM24900-1672-7 (2004)
- 해양수산부, "갯벌 등급화 기준(안): 갯벌 생태계조사 및 지속가능한 이용방안 연구 부록. 해양수산부", 61~ (2005)
- 갯벌 생태계 복원을 위한 대형저서생물 다양성 조절인자 연구, "해양수산부", 해양수산부, 291~ (2005)
- 갯벌 생태계 조사 및 지속가능한 이용방안 연구, "해양수산부", 해양수산부, 800~, pp.BSPM29100-1730-3 (2005)
- 해양 저서생물상에 의한 환경평가, "환경부", 환경부, 과학기술처, 339~ (1995)
- Borja A, "A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and costal environments", Mar Pollut Bull, 40, pp.1100~1114 (2000)
- Dauvin JC, "Paradox of estuarine quality: benthic indicators and indices, consensus or debate for the future", Mar Pollut Bull, 55, pp.271~281 (2007)
- DEFRA, "Charting progress: an integrated assessment of the state of UK Seas", pp.119~ (2005), Department for environment Food and Rural Affairs
- Diaz RJ, "A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality", J Environ Manage, 73, pp.165~181 (2004)
- Diefenderfer HL, "Multiscale analysis of restoration priorities for marine shoreline planning", J Environ Manage, 44, pp.712~731 (2009)
- European topic centre on nature conservation, 1999 work program: task 4.3 EUNIS habitat classification, draft final report, "EEA", European Environmental Agency, 209~ (1999)
- Entwistle A, "Eurasia: a biodiversity coldspot?", Oryx, 38, pp.239~240 (2004)
- Lower Columbia River restoration prioritization framework. Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division, "Evans NR", 39~, pp.BNWD-3652 (2006)
- Hong JS, "A revisit on zonal macrobenthic communities in Chokchon tidal flat, Incheon, Korea, after the survey in 1986", J Oceanogr soc Korea, 36, pp.83~92 (2001)
- Hong JS, "Macrobenthic communities on the tidal flats around Yongjong and Yongyu islands, Incheon, Korea", J Oceanogr Soc Korea, 34, pp.220~230 (1999)
- Kareiva P, "Conserving biodiversity coldspots", Am Sci, 91, pp.344~351 (2003)
- Karr JR, "Assessment of biotic intergrity using fish communities", Fisheries, 6, pp.21~27 (1981)
- Koh CH, "Environmental characteristics and distribution of macrobenthos in a mudflat of the west coast of Korea (Yellow Sea)", Neth J Sea Res, 22, pp.279~290 (1988)
- Labrune, C, "Characterizaion of the ecological quality of the coastal Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean): a comparative approach based on three biotic indices", Mar Pollut Bull, 52, pp.34~47 (2006)
- Levin LA, "The function of marine critical transition zones and the importance of sediment biodiversity", Ecosystems, 4, pp.430~451 (2001)
- Martinez ML, "Assessment of coastal dune vulnerability to natural and anthropogenic disturbances along the Gulf of Mexico", Environ Conserv, 33, pp.109~117 (2006)
- McLachlan A, "Zonation on sandy beaches", Oceanogr Mar Biol, 33, pp.305~335 (1995)
- Marine and estuarine ecosystem and habitat classification, "NOAA", National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of habitat conservation, 43~, pp.NMFS-F (2000), SPO-43
- Peterson CH, "Intertidal zonation of marine invertebrates in sand and mud", Am Sci, 79, pp.236~249 (1991)
- Reise K, "Tidal flat ecology: an experimental approach to species interactions", pp.191~ (1985), Springer-Verlag
- Smith RW, "Benthic response index for assessing infaunal communities on the southern California mainland shelf", J Appl Ecol, 11, pp.1073~1087 (2001)
- Warwick RM, "A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities", Mar Biol, 92, pp.557~562 (1986)
- Jae-Won Yoo, "Inference Models for Tidal Flat Elevation and Sediment Grain Size: A Preliminary Approach on Tidal Flat Macrobenthic Community", Ocean Science Journal, 42(2), pp.69~79 (2007), 한국해양연구원
- Yoo JW, "Environmental quality of Korean coasts as determined by modified Shannon-Wiener evenness proportion", ~ (2009)
- Zhang CI, "An ecosystem-based fisheries assessment approach for Korean fisheries", Fish Res, 100, pp.26~41 (2009)