본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국의 갯벌 생태등급도 개발을 위한 생물학적 지시자의 검토와 제안

Review and Proposition of Biological Indicators for a New Ecological Grading System of Tidal Flats in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류해양학

초록

The tidal flats of Korea today have reduced by 40% in size compared to 1964. To manage this important habitat properly, development of well-organized and nationwide-applicable grading systems is required. There have been several assessment systems proposed previously in Korea, but they are critically flawed in that selected biological indicators are not adequate and grading criteria are obscure and arbitrary. We reviewed the indicators used in these previous evaluation systems (e.g., diversity indices, quantity and quality of benthic macrofauna, halophytes, water birds, etc.) and subsequently proposed new indicators and an improved grading scheme. For the quantitative assessment of macrobenthic community, biomass reflecting production and ecosystem function is recommended over density, which is much less discriminatory among habitats. Of biodiversity indices used, within-, between-habitat and regional biodiversity indices that accurately reflect sampling efforts are suggested. In addition, we proposed to include species rarity, ecosystem engineers, and the ecological quality index ISEP (Inverse function of Shannon-Wiener Evenness Proportion). As for halophytes, their low spatial coverage on benthic habitat suggests that their presence can be used as an ecological indicator of benthic habitat, regardless of their protective status. We stress the need to introduce 1) quantile approach for quantitative indicators (e.g., diversity, biomass, etc.) in relation to grading, 2) presence-absence approach for spatial or aggregate indicators (e.g., boundaries of halophytes and feeding ground of water birds) and 3) benthic habitat mapping that combines all of these indicators.

Abstract

The tidal flats of Korea today have reduced by 40% in size compared to 1964. To manage this important habitat properly, development of well-organized and nationwide-applicable grading systems is required. There have been several assessment systems proposed previously in Korea, but they are critically flawed in that selected biological indicators are not adequate and grading criteria are obscure and arbitrary. We reviewed the indicators used in these previous evaluation systems (e.g., diversity indices, quantity and quality of benthic macrofauna, halophytes, water birds, etc.) and subsequently proposed new indicators and an improved grading scheme. For the quantitative assessment of macrobenthic community, biomass reflecting production and ecosystem function is recommended over density, which is much less discriminatory among habitats. Of biodiversity indices used, within-, between-habitat and regional biodiversity indices that accurately reflect sampling efforts are suggested. In addition, we proposed to include species rarity, ecosystem engineers, and the ecological quality index ISEP (Inverse function of Shannon-Wiener Evenness Proportion). As for halophytes, their low spatial coverage on benthic habitat suggests that their presence can be used as an ecological indicator of benthic habitat, regardless of their protective status. We stress the need to introduce 1) quantile approach for quantitative indicators (e.g., diversity, biomass, etc.) in relation to grading, 2) presence-absence approach for spatial or aggregate indicators (e.g., boundaries of halophytes and feeding ground of water birds) and 3) benthic habitat mapping that combines all of these indicators.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 국립환경연구원, "제2차 전국자연환경 조사 지침: 해안 지역", pp.33~ (2004), 국립환경연구원
  2. 해양생태계 기본조사-35.5o 곰소만 입구~ 37o 아산만, "국토해양부", 국립수산과학원 해양생태계조사사업단, 861~, pp.TR- 2008-ME-003 (2007)
  3. 습지보호지역 지정체계 개선과 후보지 평가 연구, "국토해양부", 63~ (2008)
  4. 해양생태계 기본조사-서해 남부 35.5oN 영광~34.5oN 진도, "국토해양부", 국립수산과학원 해양생태계조사사업단, 692~, pp.TR-2009-ME-011 (2009)
  5. 남정호, "자연해안 서식지 총량관리제 도입 필요성과 기본방향", 월간해양수산, 239, pp.68~87 (2004)
  6. 갯벌 매립사업 환경평가 개선방안에 관한 연구, "맹준호", 한국환경정책평가연구원, 147~, pp.KEI-2007-RE-18 (2007)
  7. 국토연안생태네트워크 구축과 계획적 관리방안(I), "박창석", 한국환경정책평가연구원, 229~, pp.KEI-2008- RE-07 (2008)
  8. 멸종위기야생동식물종의 선정 평가기법 연구, "방상원", 한국환경정책평가연구원, 332~, pp.KEI-2005-RE-13 (2005)
  9. 백상규, "우리나라 서?남해안에서 출현하는 다모류를 통한해역의 생태등급 산정", 한국습지학회지, 7(2), pp.89~104 (2005), 한국습지학회
  10. 유재원, "대형 저서동물 군집의 채집 면적이 상대적 출현 종수에 갖는 효과의 추정", 바다, 9(1), pp.20~29 (2004), 한국해양학회
  11. 유재원, "한국 갯벌 생태 등급도의 개발 필요성과 방향", Ocean and Polar Research, 32(2), pp.137~144 (2010), 한국해양연구원
  12. 유재원, "Box model을 이용한 서해 곰소만 하전 갯벌의 질소수지", 바다, 7(4), pp.5~266 (2002), 한국해양학회
  13. 이기섭, "조류에 의한 갯벌의 등급화 연구", 한국습지학회지, 6(1), pp.105~115 (2004), 한국습지학회
  14. 이창근, "갯벌의 생태적 가치평가와 저서생물에 의한 정화기능의 가치", 박사, pp.2009
  15. 영종, 영흥도 갯벌 습지보호지역 지정을 위한 타당성 조사 및 기본 계획, "인천광역시", 인천광역시, 280~ (2004)
  16. 장진호, "보호지역 지정을 위한 갯벌의 평가기준 개발과 전남 지역갯벌의 평가", 한국환경과학회지, 17(12), pp.1391~1402 (2008), 한국환경과학회
  17. 최진우, "마산만 저서생태계를 중심으로 연안해역 건강성 평가를 위한 저서생물지수의 적용", Ocean and Polar Research, 29(4), pp.339~348 (2007), 한국해양연구원
  18. 한국수자원공사, "시화호 약사 -자연과 문화의 시화호, 개발과 성장의 시화호", pp.499~ (2006), 한국수자원공사
  19. 갯벌 생태계 조사 및 지속가능한 이용방안 연구, "해양수산부", 해양수산부, 1130~, pp.BSPM221-00-1610-3 (2003)
  20. 해양수산부, "갯벌 등급화 기준(안): 갯벌 생태계조사 및 지속가능한 이용방안 연구 부록", pp.61~ (2005), 해양수산부
  21. 갯벌 생태계 조사 및 지속가능한 이용방안 연구, "해양수산부", 해양수산부, 800~, pp.BSPM29100-1730-3 (2005)
  22. 해양생태계 기본조사-37o 아산만~38o 최북단, "해양수산부", 해양수산부, 687~ (2006)
  23. 홍재상, "시화 방조제의 건설은 저서동물군집의 시공간 분포에 어떠한 영향을 미쳤는가", 한국수산학회지, 30, pp.882~895 (1997)
  24. Techniques for spatial analysis and visualization of benthic mapping data-final report, "Andrews B", Science Applications International Corporation, 28~, pp.SAIC Report No 623 (2003)
  25. Baan PJA, "Testing of indicators for the marine and coastal environment in Europe-Part 3: present state and development of indicators for eutrophication, hazardous substances, oil and ecological quality", pp.64~ (2003), European Environ Age
  26. Benkendorff K, "Multiple measures are necessary to assess rarity in macro-molluscs: a case study from southeastern Australia", Biodivers Conserv, 17, pp.2455~2478 (2008)
  27. Borja A, "Assessing estuarine benthic quality conditions in Chesapeake Bay: a comparison of three indices", Ecol Indic, 8, pp.395~403 (2008)
  28. Borja A, "A marine biotic Index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments", Mar Pollut Bull, 40, pp.1100~1114 (2000)
  29. Cao Y, "How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment", Limnol Oceanogr, 43, pp.1403~1409 (1998)
  30. Dale RK, "Spatial and temporal patterns of salinity and temperature at an intertidal groundwater seep", Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 72, pp.283~298 (2007)
  31. Dauvin, JC, "Paradox of estuarine quality: benthic indicators and indices, consensus or debate for the future", Mar Pollut Bull, 55, pp.271~281 (2007)
  32. Identification of ecologically and biologically significant areas, "DFO", DFO, 15~ (2004)
  33. Diaz RJ, "A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality", J Environ Manage, 73, pp.165~181 (2004)
  34. Gaston KJ, "Rarity", pp.205~ (1994), Chapman and Hall
  35. Grace JB, "Vegetation associations in a rare community type-coastal tallgrass prairie", Plant Ecol, 147, pp.105~115 (2000)
  36. Gray JS, "The measurement of marine species diversity, with an application to the benthic fauna of the Norwegian continental shelf", J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 250, pp.23~49 (2000)
  37. Huston MA, "Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes", pp.681~ (1994), Cambridge Univ Press
  38. IWWR, "An introduction and user's guide to wetland restoration, creation, and enhancement", pp.2003, NOAA Fisheries F
  39. Kuipers BR, "Energy flow in a tidal flat ecosystem", Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 5, pp.215~221 (1981)
  40. Labrune C, "Characterizaion of the ecological quality of the coastal Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean)-a comparative approach based on three biotic indices", Mar Pollut Bull, 52, pp.34~47 (2006)
  41. Primack RB, "Essentials of conservation biology", pp.698~ (2002), Sinauer Associates
  42. Reise K, "Tidal flat ecology: an experimental approach to species interaction", pp.191~ (1985), Springer-Verlag
  43. Sanderson WG, "Rarity of marine benthic species in Great Britain development and application of asessment criteria", Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshwat Ecosyst, 6, pp.245~256 (1996)
  44. Whittaker RH, "Communities and ecosystems, 2nd edition", pp.385~ (1975), Macmillan
  45. 홍재상, "Empirical models for predicting gamma diversity in macrobenthic communities of Korean tidal flats", Korea and Japan Joint Symposium on Biology of Tidal Flat 2009, pp.101~102 (2009), 순천시청
  46. 홍재상, "Rare species of tidal flat macrobenthic communities in Korea", Korea and Japan Joint Symposium on Biology of Tidal Flat 2009, pp.47~47 (2009), 순천시청
  47. Yoo JW, "Environmental quality of Korean coasts as determined by modified Shannon-Wiener evenness proportion", Environ Monit Assess, 170, pp.141~157 (2010)
  48. Biological assessment report of the Yellow Sea ecoregion: ecologically important areas for the Yellow Sea ecoregion’s biodiversity, "YSEPP", WWF KORDI KEI, 239~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)