본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지역 현대문학 연구의 새로운 방법

New methodology for the modern region literature study

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

When we study modern region literature, we would rather focus on 'region' literature instead of 'modern' literature. The terminology 'region', Jiyeok in Korean, has been acquired by the struggle with centralism. For this reason, the terminology of the region literature originates in the idea of equality. There are systematic lineages and notions in the methodology of modern region literature study as; literature study, Korean literature, Korean modern literature study, Korean modern region literature. The most important of the region literature is regionality and literality. The balance of the two determining factors is the key role of the region literature. The region literature are likely written through the idea of a regional way of thinking, way of living, way of sense etc. The contents and forms of the region literature could be expressed with regionality. When literary esthetic value could be revealed by the regionality of its own region, literary works will have a meaning in the context of the literature. If we are trying to study region literature, we can adopt historian F. Braudel's historical viewpoint of 'long-term span' on the history, and Foucault's archeological method. With those methodologies, we can analyze the cultural background of region literature. With those methods, researchers must establish the methodology of the modern region literature study. In brief conclusion, regionality might be adopted into the research methodology. There is one distinctive feature that Gyeongsang and Jeolla province's researchers have quite a different attitude from other province's researchers. The reason of why they have such a different viewpoint has to do with the regional characteristics based on the long term span of history. Unlike to other researchers, the two region's researchers are concentrating on the their own regional identities.

Abstract

When we study modern region literature, we would rather focus on 'region' literature instead of 'modern' literature. The terminology 'region', Jiyeok in Korean, has been acquired by the struggle with centralism. For this reason, the terminology of the region literature originates in the idea of equality. There are systematic lineages and notions in the methodology of modern region literature study as; literature study, Korean literature, Korean modern literature study, Korean modern region literature. The most important of the region literature is regionality and literality. The balance of the two determining factors is the key role of the region literature. The region literature are likely written through the idea of a regional way of thinking, way of living, way of sense etc. The contents and forms of the region literature could be expressed with regionality. When literary esthetic value could be revealed by the regionality of its own region, literary works will have a meaning in the context of the literature. If we are trying to study region literature, we can adopt historian F. Braudel's historical viewpoint of 'long-term span' on the history, and Foucault's archeological method. With those methodologies, we can analyze the cultural background of region literature. With those methods, researchers must establish the methodology of the modern region literature study. In brief conclusion, regionality might be adopted into the research methodology. There is one distinctive feature that Gyeongsang and Jeolla province's researchers have quite a different attitude from other province's researchers. The reason of why they have such a different viewpoint has to do with the regional characteristics based on the long term span of history. Unlike to other researchers, the two region's researchers are concentrating on the their own regional identities.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 경북대학교 대형과제연구단, "근현대 경북지역 문학의 흐름과 특성" (2005), 정림사
  2. 경북대학교 대형과제연구단, "근현대 대구 경북지역 영미 독일어문학 수용사" (2005), 정림사
  3. 경북대학교 대형과제연구단, "근현대 대구 경북지역 일본어문학 수용사" (2005), 정림사
  4. 경북대학교 대형과제연구단, "근현대 대구지역 문학의 흐름과 특성" (2005), 정림사
  5. 구모룡, "지역 문학과 주변부적 시각" (2005), 신생(전망)
  6. 김동윤, "지역문학 연구의 현황과 과제", 현대문학이론연구, 33(33), pp.33~55 (2008), 현대문학이론학회
  7. 김병택, "지역문학의 현실과 미래", 한국문학평론, (21) (2002)
  8. 김승환, "충북 근현대 문학사", 충북학 (2004)
  9. 김춘섭, "문학의 지방화와 탈식민주의", 현대소설연구 (2003)
  10. 남송우, "지역문학 연구의 현황과 과제 (2) - 제주, 전남광주, 부산경남을 중심으로 -", 한국문학논총, (45), pp.433~470 (2007), 한국문학회
  11. 남송우, "부산 지역문학 속에 나타난 부산성의 모색", 인문사회과학연구, 6 (2006), 부경대학교
  12. 남송우, "지역문학 연구의 현황과 과제", 국어국문학, (144) (2006)
  13. 박태일, "한국 지역문학의 논리" (2004), 청동거울
  14. 송기섭, "지역문학의 타자성", 문학마당 (2004)
  15. 송명희, "탈식민주의와 지역문학 연구― 김정한·송기숙을 중심으로 ―", 현대소설연구, 19, pp.25~46 (2003), 한국현대소설학회
  16. 양영길, "지역문학과 문학사 인식" (2006), 국학자료원
  17. 양왕용, "한국현대시와 지역문학" (2006), 작가마을
  18. 오홍진, "지역문학 담론의 현황과 과제" (2008), 국학자료원
  19. 이상진, "일제하 진주지역의 역사와 박경리의 토지", 현대문학의 연구 (2005)
  20. 이종인, "지방자치 10년과 지역문화정책", 지역문화 (2006)
  21. 이형권, "지역문학의 탈식민성과 글로컬리즘 - 대전-충남 문학을 중심으로", 어문연구 (2006)
  22. 임명진, "전북 지역문학의 생성배경과 발현 양상", 작가와 사회, (17) (2004)
  23. 임재해, "구비문학 유산과 지역문화의 상생적 관계", 구비문학연구
  24. 조동일, "지방문학사" (2003), 서울대출판부
  25. 한국현대소설학회, "문학의 지방화와 탈식민주의" (2003)
  26. Braudel,Fernand, "물질문명과 자본주의 Ⅰ-1" (2004), 까치
  27. Descartes,Ren, "A Discourse on Method, PART II" (2008), The Project Gutenberg EBook
  28. Foucault, Michael, "The Archaeology of Knowledge, translated by A.M. Sheridan Smith" (1972), Tavistock Publications Ltd

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)