뉴어바니즘의 국내 적용 가능성 분석: 수도권 주민에 대한 설문조사를 중심으로
Applicability of New Urbanism to Korea: Survey of Residents of the Seoul Metropolitan Area
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
This study aims at investigating the applicability of the principles of New Urbanism to Korea. This study surveys the residents of the Seoul Metropolitan Area who are consumers in the housing market. The questions of the survey deal with the issues of New Urbanism such as self-containment, transportation, land use, scenic view, social mix and the formation of community. This study analyzes the responses based on independent variables of domicile, type of housing, income, academic background, sex and age. The analysis identifies that the principles of New Urbanism such as public transportation, public space, and self-containment in the side of consumption are applicable to Korea. On the other hand, the respondents reveal their negative opinions about mixed use of buildings, jobs-housing balance, residential areas with high-density and renewal of inner city. In terms of this, it seems to be restrictively possible to introduce the principles of New Urbanism to urban developments in Korea.
참고문헌 (21)
- "뉴어버니즘의 실제: 미국 켄틀랜즈 사례", 51, pp.109~130 (2006), 국토연구원
- "뉴어바니즘은 신보수주의 프로젝트인가?", 18(4), pp.97~118 (2006), 한국지역개발학회
- "사회경제적 관점에서 바라본 뉴어바니즘: 비판적 고찰을 중심으로", 9(2), pp.125~138 (2006), 한국도시지리학회
- "뉴 어바니즘, 근대적 접근인가, 탈근대적 접근인가?", 19(2), pp.49~74 (2006), 한국도시행정학회
- "뉴 어바니즘 도시설계의 가능성과 한계성에 관한 연구", 16(5), pp.77~86 (2000), 대한건축학회
- "뉴어바니즘 도시설계에 관한 고찰", 12(1), pp.41~57 (2000), 대한지역개발학회
- "신전통주의 계획이론에 의한 주택단지 조성 방안 연구", 13(1), pp.29~48 (2005), 한국주택학회
- "성장관리의 이론과 실제" (2006), 서울 : 동서문화사
- "살고 싶은 신도시 모델 설정" (2006)
- "사회조사분석" (2003), 서울 : 다산출판사
- "The Quest for Community: A Study of Kentlands" (2001)
- "The Regional City" (2001), Washington: Island Press
- "Towns and Town-Making Principles" (2006), New York : Rizzoli
- "New Directions in Planning Theory", 35(4), pp.451~478 (2000)
- "Financing New Urbanism Projects", 11(3), pp.733~750 (2000)
- "The New Urbanism and the Communitarian Trap", 1, pp.1~3 (1997)
- "What’s the Mission of Harvard’s Urban Planning Program?", 22, pp.1~4 (2005)
- "Sense of community in neotraditional and conventional suburban developments" (2001)
- "Is Kentlands better than Radburn?", 69(1), pp.50~70 (2003)
- "Sense of Community and Neighborhood Form: an Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism", 36(8), pp.1361~1379 (1999)
- "New Urbanism and American Planning" (2005), New York : Routledge