지속가능한 발전을 위한 통합적인 도시 평가
An Integrated Assessment of Urban for Sustainable Development
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the sustainability in 45 cities of all over Gyeongnam andGyeongbuk using weights and assessment system developed in leading research. The materialsof assessment used statistical data and spatial data were standardized for the systematic result.The assessment score was established using the normal distribution from 25 to 125 for removalof the very smallest and maximum value.According to the results, Tongyeong was assessed the highest by 82.5 score in environmentalsustainability index. In economical sustainability index, Pohang, Gumi, Changwon, Yangsanwere more than 79 score but Busan, Daegu, Andong were less than 70 score. Ulsan, Geoje,Yangsan were assessed higher in society-institutional sustainability index and Jinju,Munkyeong, Changnyeong were showed higher than other cities by more 79 score in quality oflife(QOL)’s sustainability index. In case of integrated sustainability index, Jinju that was thehighest sustainability in QOL was assessed by first city. However, Ulsan was assessed thelowest city among others. Therefore cities which have high sustainability will prepare a politicinvestment program for maintaining current conditions. Cities which have low sustainabilitywill grasp closely the environmental characteristics of urban and present the improvementdirection through monitoring continuously. Overall, these results can be used as tools to assessthe current cities and predict the future one. It is also necessary to establish a systematic urbanplanning for livable and sustainable city.
참고문헌 (26)
- 고석찬, "우리나라 지방과학기술 여건과 지역성장의 상관성 분석", 27(1), pp.227~245 (2002)
- 김경태, "Ecological Footprint를 활용한 도시환경용량평가" (2005), 석사학위논문
- 김귀곤, "도시지속성지표 개발과 적용에 관한 연구", 32(3), pp.175~195 (1997)
- "지역경제의 활성화와 신산업의 창출", 54, pp.26~37 (2005)
- 박재홍, "수도권의 인구이동의 산업구조 변화에 관한 연구", pp.203~219 (1993)
- 박현옥, "삶의 질 향상을 위한 일상생활환경의 만족도에 관한 연구-충남 홍성군을 중심으로", 15(1), pp.83~93 (2006)
- "도시별 지속가능성의 측정과 도시간 지속가능성 비교연구", 33(1), pp.151~168 (1999)
- 이동근, "지속가능한 도시개발을 위한 환경지표에 관한 연구", 7(1), pp.93~107 (1998)
- 이우성, "낙동강중류의 토지피복형태를 고려한 유역별 수질오염도 분석", 15(4), pp.349~357 (2006)
- 이우성, "도시 지속성 평가를 위한 통합지표의 가중치 결정", 42(3), pp.7~22 (2007)
- 이종철, "중국 도시부문의 정보통신격차와 소득불평등", 16(3), pp.113~137 (2004)
- 정회성, "환경적합성 평가기법의 개선과 활용방안 연구 한국환경정책평가연구원 연구보고서" (1993)
- "지방단위 지속가능 발전지표 연구" (2005)
- "지속가능발전지표(DSI)를 적용한 도시환경의 평가-서울시 25개구를 대상으로" (2002)
- 최태룡, "진주시 삶의 질 연구: 200년 조사", 22, pp.139~171 (2000)
- 홍영록, "지방도시의 지속가능성 평가모형", 27(4), pp.1~12 (1999)
- "환경계획연구소 개발사업의 환경기여도 평가제도 도입에 관한 연구 환경계획연구소" (1992)
- Clean Water Service, "Effect Impervious Area Reduction Task Force Report" (2002)
- CWP, "Impact of Impervious Cover on Aquatic System" (2003)
- Jones, K. B, "Predicting nutrient and sediment loading to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region", 16, pp.301~312 (2001)
- Mayers, "Community-relevantmeasurement of quality of life" (1987)
- Diener, "Review of thesatisfaction with life scale" (1993)
- Platt, "The University of Massachusetts Press" (1994)
- Sneddon, C, "Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world", pp.253~268 (2006)
- WEF, "2001 Environmental Sustainability Idex" (2001)
- WEF, "2002 Environmental Sustainability Idex" (2002)