본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『文明小史』 속 ‘문명’ 담론의 표상(表象)과 그 패러독스(paradox)

The Representation of the discourse of civilization and its paradox in the 『Wenmingxiaoshi』

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

『文明小史(Wenmingxiaoshi)』 witten by LiBoYuan is a symbol of civilizations such as the exposition of modern ideas in modern Chinese period and the reflection on the practice of civilization, social reform, and new political system. These facts are so relatively distinct in the recognition of LiBoYuan and the 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 that it may not be necessary to reconsider. However, this fact poses one question at the same time. The question is that the conflicting positions between the representations of the civilization discourse in 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 and the back of it show contradictions This paper starts from the awareness of these issues. In this point of view, 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 is an important reference text that can trace the modern ideas, and it will be a valid standard to shed new light on the formation of modern China. Therefore, this paper first looks at the discourse of civilization as a modern representation system scattered throughout the 『Wenmingxiaoshi』, and tries to see the paradoxical inherent in 'civilization'. LiBoYuan had embodied his civilization discourse through popular propagation of science and technology and scientific knowledge through education, civilization reform, and modern institutionalization as a cornerstone of civilization. This confirms how many efforts and attempts had been made by modern China, including LiBoYuan, toward civilization. To them, civilization blossom was a discourse that was identifiable to all of the Western world, which was a result that are synonymous with the spread of science and technology and scientific knowledge, the construction of education and school based on civilization and the foundation of the social reform and modern institutions However, the civilization discourses and representations reflected in the 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 were not coordinated or filtered by the clash of Western civilization and Chinese tradition. The western philosophy and civilization theory that were imported at the time when the Western powers were forcing the Western civilization against the whole world and they were conveyed to the public as an idea of civilization. So this revealed the false perception of Western civilization, the paradox of civilization. Considering this point, it can be said that 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 written by LiBoYuan is a new paradigm of modern Chinese, and presents the afterimage which has not properly established it yet. despite its presentations of civilization discourse.

Abstract

『文明小史(Wenmingxiaoshi)』 witten by LiBoYuan is a symbol of civilizations such as the exposition of modern ideas in modern Chinese period and the reflection on the practice of civilization, social reform, and new political system. These facts are so relatively distinct in the recognition of LiBoYuan and the 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 that it may not be necessary to reconsider. However, this fact poses one question at the same time. The question is that the conflicting positions between the representations of the civilization discourse in 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 and the back of it show contradictions This paper starts from the awareness of these issues. In this point of view, 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 is an important reference text that can trace the modern ideas, and it will be a valid standard to shed new light on the formation of modern China. Therefore, this paper first looks at the discourse of civilization as a modern representation system scattered throughout the 『Wenmingxiaoshi』, and tries to see the paradoxical inherent in 'civilization'. LiBoYuan had embodied his civilization discourse through popular propagation of science and technology and scientific knowledge through education, civilization reform, and modern institutionalization as a cornerstone of civilization. This confirms how many efforts and attempts had been made by modern China, including LiBoYuan, toward civilization. To them, civilization blossom was a discourse that was identifiable to all of the Western world, which was a result that are synonymous with the spread of science and technology and scientific knowledge, the construction of education and school based on civilization and the foundation of the social reform and modern institutions However, the civilization discourses and representations reflected in the 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 were not coordinated or filtered by the clash of Western civilization and Chinese tradition. The western philosophy and civilization theory that were imported at the time when the Western powers were forcing the Western civilization against the whole world and they were conveyed to the public as an idea of civilization. So this revealed the false perception of Western civilization, the paradox of civilization. Considering this point, it can be said that 『Wenmingxiaoshi』 written by LiBoYuan is a new paradigm of modern Chinese, and presents the afterimage which has not properly established it yet. despite its presentations of civilization discourse.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 李伯元, "文明小史" (1982), 上海古籍出版社
  2. 李伯元, "文明小史" (1996), 花山文藝出版社
  3. "李伯元全集" (1997), 江蘇古籍出版社
  4. 리바이위안, "문명소사" (2011), 지식을 만드는 지식
  5. 리바이위안, "문명소사" (2015), 내일이비즈
  6. 李伯元, "문명소사" (2014), 을유문화사
  7. "한성순보(漢城旬報), 1884.3.27", ~ (1884)
  8. 李鴻章, "李文忠公全集, 光緖三十一年金陵刻", ~
  9. 賴芳伶, "淸末小說與社會政治變遷" (1994), 大安出版社
  10. 桑咸之, "晩淸政治與文化" (1996), 中國社會科學出版社
  11. 歐陽健, "晩淸小說史" (1997), 浙江古籍出版社
  12. 武潤婷, "中國近代小說演變史" (1997), 浙江古籍出版社
  13. 龔書鐸, "中國近代文化槪論" (1997), 中華書局
  14. 夏曉虹, "晩淸社會與文化" (1999), 湖北敎育出版社
  15. 楊聯芬, "晩淸至五四 : 中國文學現代性的發生" (2003), 北京大學出版社
  16. 李喜所, "中國近代社會與文化硏究" (2003), 人民出版社
  17. 陳平原, "中國現代小說的起點-淸末民初小說硏究" (2005), 北京大學出版社
  18. 魏朝勇, "民國時期文學的政治想像" (2006), 華夏出版社
  19. 單正平, "晩淸民族主義與文學轉型" (2006), 人民出版社
  20. 楊 霞, "淸末民初的中國意識與文學中的國家想象" (2012), 南京師範大學出版社
  21. 아 영, "中國近代小說史" (1987), 정음사
  22. 노르베르트 앨리야스, "문명화과정Ⅰ Ⅱ" (1996), 한길사
  23. 문정진, "청말의 ‘신소설’ 연구" (2000), 중국도서문화중심
  24. 고모리 요이치, "포스트 콜로니얼" (2002), 삼인
  25. 전형준, "동아시아적 시각으로 바라보는 중국문학" (2004), 서울대학교 출판부
  26. 이종민, "근대 중국의 문학적 사유 읽기" (2004), 소명출판
  27. 이화여대 한국문화원, "근대 계몽기 지식 개념의 수용과 그 변용" (2004), 소명출판
  28. 진재교, "동아시아 서사학의 전통과 근대" (2005), 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원
  29. 홍석표, "중국의 근대적 문학의식 탄생" (2007), 북코리아
  30. 진재교, "충돌과 착종의 동아시아를 넘어서" (2007), 성균관대출판부
  31. 유용태, "함께 읽는 동아시아 근현대사" (2010), 창비
  32. 동북아역사재단, "1910년-그 이전 100년, 한국과 일본의 서양문명 수용" (2011), 경인문화
  33. 김선민, "동아시아의 근대, 그 중심과 주변" (2013), 소명출판
  34. 권상태, "『文明小史』 연구" (1991), 경북대학교 대학원
  35. 이민숙, "『文明小史』 연구" (1992), 한국외국어대학교 대학원
  36. 周宰嬉, "『文明小史』的創作技巧 硏究", 중국학연구, 2 (1985)
  37. 周宰嬉, "從『文明小史』的人物類型看晩淸社會", 중국연구, (9) (1985)
  38. 김석기, "李伯元 小說 硏究" (1995), 성균관대학교 대학원
  39. 김석기, "李伯元 小說을 通해 본 晩淸社會의 奇現狀", 중국소설논총, 7 (1998)
  40. 이종민, "근대 중국의 세계적응과 자기모색 : 세계, 진화, 문명, 민족 개념을 중심으로", 중국문학, 76, pp.267~308 (2013), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
  41. 류창진, "晩淸 政治小說 考察", 중국인문과학, (34), pp.405~424 (2006), 중국인문학회
  42. 류창진, "만청(晩淸) 소설 속의 중국의식과 정치상상: <文明小史>를 중심으로", 중국인문과학, (63), pp.285~308 (2016), 중국인문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)