본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『無門關』에 나타난 ‘將’의 용법 小考

A Study on the Methods of Usage of 'Jiang(將)' that are Found in the 'Mumungwan(『無門關』)' Text

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In order to analyze the Hanwen Yuandian(漢文原典) which refers to the original Chinese character text, the following conditions must be confirmed. First, the exact meaning that was used amongst the many meanings of the actual Chinese character within the context of the sentence must be checked. Second, not only are Chinese characters an independent language entity, they are also devoid of hierarchy and format and must be interpreted only through word order. As such, the components of the actual sentence structure must be checked to see if it is correctly aligned. Third, the Chinese character itself is an ideograph but in many cases, it has a lot of borrowed meaning from elsewhere. So, an additional careful scrutiny must be made to see if it can be interpreted in relation to sound. In this paper, the fundamental meaning of the Chinese character ‘Jiang(將)’ was taken under scrutiny and various meanings that have originated from it were looked into. Several deductions were made in conclusion as a result of this. The character ‘Jiang(將)’ was found not only to be used just as an adverb or verb, but was actually being used as an introductory word(介詞) and even a postpositional particle(助詞). Here lies the problem as most translators were seen to commit the error of translating the character with the mistaken assumption that it always has a lexical meaning. Based on the findings of this paper, it is strongly urged that other Chinese characters other than the ‘Jiang(將)’ should be scrutinized in a similar way. The Chinese character ‘得’ especially is a character that occupies an important position in the modern Chinese language(近代漢語) and contemporary Chinese language(現代漢語) and should be given further emphasis.

Abstract

In order to analyze the Hanwen Yuandian(漢文原典) which refers to the original Chinese character text, the following conditions must be confirmed. First, the exact meaning that was used amongst the many meanings of the actual Chinese character within the context of the sentence must be checked. Second, not only are Chinese characters an independent language entity, they are also devoid of hierarchy and format and must be interpreted only through word order. As such, the components of the actual sentence structure must be checked to see if it is correctly aligned. Third, the Chinese character itself is an ideograph but in many cases, it has a lot of borrowed meaning from elsewhere. So, an additional careful scrutiny must be made to see if it can be interpreted in relation to sound. In this paper, the fundamental meaning of the Chinese character ‘Jiang(將)’ was taken under scrutiny and various meanings that have originated from it were looked into. Several deductions were made in conclusion as a result of this. The character ‘Jiang(將)’ was found not only to be used just as an adverb or verb, but was actually being used as an introductory word(介詞) and even a postpositional particle(助詞). Here lies the problem as most translators were seen to commit the error of translating the character with the mistaken assumption that it always has a lexical meaning. Based on the findings of this paper, it is strongly urged that other Chinese characters other than the ‘Jiang(將)’ should be scrutinized in a similar way. The Chinese character ‘得’ especially is a character that occupies an important position in the modern Chinese language(近代漢語) and contemporary Chinese language(現代漢語) and should be given further emphasis.

참고문헌 (6)

  1. 吳福祥, "敦煌變文語法硏究" (1996), 岳麓書社
  2. 金吉祥, "佛敎大辭典" (1998), 弘法院
  3. 羅竹風, "漢語大詞典" (2001), 上海古籍
  4. 安在哲, "『緇門警訓』의 문법적 이해" (2004), 하늘북
  5. 谷衍圭, "漢字源流字典" (2010), 語文出版社
  6. 안재철, "수행자와 중문학자가 함께 풀이한『무문관』" (2014), 운주사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)