한중 돈 관련 속담에 나타난 은유의 인지적 분석
A Cognitive Analysis of Metaphors on Money in Korean and Chinese Proverbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The use of metaphors requires special abilities and the metaphors seen at the level of rhetoric were seen as related to human recognition in 1980s. The cognitive linguist argued that human thinking itself is metaphysical. Metaphor is closely linked to our lives and the conventional metaphor is something we have not noticed. Through proverbs, we can experience more directly the metaphors used in our daily lives We compared and analyzed the source domain of the metaphor shown in the Korean-Chinese money proverb in this paper. According to the analysis, the conceptualization process commonly used in Korean and Chinese proverbs has [power], [product], [the cause of a disease], and [drug]. The use of such a source of money is a universal phenomenon not only in Korea and China, but also globally. Or, if [organism] was used as the source of money, Chinese proverbs were showing more diverse aspects. We also saw the difference between Korea and China in the subcategories of [organism] and [plant]. In the area of origin of [animal], the case of Korea involved emotional experience, while the case of China was conceptualizing the sensual experience. The source area of [plant] was found only in proverbs. Or even the use of the source area of food was not easy to find in Korea while China used various kinds. If it appears to be [liquid], it is seen a lot in China, while it has not appeared in Korean proverbs. In particular, money, which appears to be oil or alcohol, is also believed to be related to China's food culture. Finally, in the case of money proverbs with [natural] as the source, it can only be found in China. Through the analysis of the source areas used in the Chinese and Korean money proverbs, we can say that we can understand the cultural phenomena of a country. It can be said that the perception of money is the most basic value of the people, which is consistent with the structure of the most basic conceptual metaphor among its ethnic cultures.
Abstract
The use of metaphors requires special abilities and the metaphors seen at the level of rhetoric were seen as related to human recognition in 1980s. The cognitive linguist argued that human thinking itself is metaphysical. Metaphor is closely linked to our lives and the conventional metaphor is something we have not noticed. Through proverbs, we can experience more directly the metaphors used in our daily lives We compared and analyzed the source domain of the metaphor shown in the Korean-Chinese money proverb in this paper. According to the analysis, the conceptualization process commonly used in Korean and Chinese proverbs has [power], [product], [the cause of a disease], and [drug]. The use of such a source of money is a universal phenomenon not only in Korea and China, but also globally. Or, if [organism] was used as the source of money, Chinese proverbs were showing more diverse aspects. We also saw the difference between Korea and China in the subcategories of [organism] and [plant]. In the area of origin of [animal], the case of Korea involved emotional experience, while the case of China was conceptualizing the sensual experience. The source area of [plant] was found only in proverbs. Or even the use of the source area of food was not easy to find in Korea while China used various kinds. If it appears to be [liquid], it is seen a lot in China, while it has not appeared in Korean proverbs. In particular, money, which appears to be oil or alcohol, is also believed to be related to China's food culture. Finally, in the case of money proverbs with [natural] as the source, it can only be found in China. Through the analysis of the source areas used in the Chinese and Korean money proverbs, we can say that we can understand the cultural phenomena of a country. It can be said that the perception of money is the most basic value of the people, which is consistent with the structure of the most basic conceptual metaphor among its ethnic cultures.
참고문헌 (46)
- 강성영, "프랑스와 우리나라의 동물속담에 있어서 은유추론 관계 비교 연구", 프랑스어문교육, (18), pp.149~169 (2004), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 김사엽, "俗談論" (1953), 大建出版社
- 김종도, "A Comparative Study on Proverbs of Koreans & Arabs - Focusing on The Wealth -", 한국이슬람학회논총, 17(1), pp.201~212 (2007), 한국이슬람학회
- 김정남, "‘돈’ 관련 한국어 관용 표현의 의미와 분포—한국어 어휘교육의 관점을 지향하며", 한국어와 문화, 19 (2015)
- 김혜령, "속담 기반 표현의 특성", 한국어 의미학, 54, pp.203~229 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 륙 흔, "중한속담의 문화적 의미에 대한 연구" (2005), 黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社
- 모리모토 가츠히코(森本勝彦), "한일 양국의 가족 속담에 관한 비교 연구－ 은유와 환유를 중심으로", 한국언어문화, (32), pp.75~112 (2007), 한국언어문화학회
- 박병석, "속담으로 본 중국인의 금전의식과 빈부의식", 중앙사론, 14 (2000)
- 박애양, "한중 날씨 관련 속담에 나타난 특징 비교", 중국연구, 66, pp.103~124 (2016), 중국연구소[DOI]
- 방운규, "돈 관련 속담에 나타난 한국인의 의식구조", 겨레어문학, 31 (2003)
- 심재기, "속담의 종합적 검토를 위하여", 冠嶽語文硏究, 7(1) (1982)
- 송재선, "우리말 속담 큰 사전" (1983), 서문당
- 송재선, "돈속담사전" (1998), 東文選
- 이유미, "한국어 은유의 근원영역 특징- ‘불’, ‘물’, ‘온도’를 중심으로 -", 한국어 의미학, 20, pp.187~203 (2006), 한국어의미학회
- 이기문, "속담사전" (2014), 일조각
- 이화형, "한･중 속담으로 본 음식문화의 융합방식 비교", 동아시아고대학, (35), pp.505~532 (2014), 동아시아고대학회
- 이황진, "한·중 불교 관련 속담 비교 연구 －부처에 대한 인식 및 속담과 불교의 영향관계를 중심으로－", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (73), pp.331~361 (2016), 한민족어문학회
- 이병민, "韓中의 人性 및 飮食男女 관련 속담 비교 연구", 중국문학연구, (73), pp.211~237 (2018), 한국중문학회[DOI]
- LiuXueFei, "한중 동물 속담의 문화적 의미 대조", 한국어교육연구, (9) (2018)
- 임동권, "속담사전" (2002), 민속원
- 임지룡, "감정의 문화적 변이 양상: ‘화’를 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 44, pp.199~234 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 임지룡, "‘두려움’의 문화적 변이 양상", 언어과학연구, (74), pp.217~252 (2015), 언어과학회
- 조혜진, "한국어와 스페인어의 날씨 예측 속담 비교 연구", 스페인라틴아메리카연구, 7(2), pp.175~202 (2014), 스페인 라틴아메리카 연구소[DOI]
- 주경희, "속담 비유성의 의미화용론적 연구", 국어교육학연구, (25), pp.421~444 (2006), 국어교육학회
- 최성은, "폴란드와 한국의 속담 비교 연구 - 말(言)과 관련된 속담을 중심으로", 세계문학비교연구, (59), pp.195~220 (2017), 세계문학비교학회
- 윤경애, "한국어와 중국어의 개념적 은유에 대한 일고찰 - 정치 관련 기사를 중심으로 -", 중국인문과학, (43), pp.159~174 (2009), 중국인문학회
- 孔德明, "认知看经济语篇中的隐喻概念", 外语与外语教学(Foreign Languages and Their Teaching), (2) (2002)
- 譚紅, "汉字“油”的概念隐喻研究", 硕士, pp.2016
- 陆卫萍, "文化模式与隱喻", Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition), 8(3) (2007)
- 李思艺, "汉语“山”的概念隐喻及其文化特征", Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology(Social Science Edition), 18(2) (2015)
- 溫端政, "俗談大辭典" (2015), 商務印書館
- 王守元, "隐喻与文化教学", Foreign Language Education(外语教学), 24(1), pp.48~52 (2003)
- 曾玲玲, "体验哲学视角下的英汉金钱词汇隐喻", 浙江万里学院学报(Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University), 22(4) (2009)
- 叶鸣, "汉英概念隐喻对比", 硕士, pp.2004
- Charteris-Black, , English for Specific Purposes, 22(2), pp.153~176 (2003)
- HOU Rong, "Proverbs Reveal Culture Diversity", Cross-Cultural Communication, 9(2) (2013)
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphor and Thought" (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff, "More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor" (1989), University of Chicago Press
- Silaški, N., "The Money is a liquid metaphor in economic terminology – a contrastive analysis of English, Serbian and Romanian", Professional communication and translation studies, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, 4, pp.1~2 (2011), Po-litehnica University of Timișoara Press
- Tanweer Ali, "Money as metaphor", On the Horizon, 22(4), pp.297~307 (2014)
- Wenjun Zhong, "A Cross-cultural Contrastive Analysis of Views on Friendship in Chinese and English Proverbs", Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11 (2017)
- Yu, Ning, "Metaphorical Expressions of Anger and Happiness in English and Chinese", Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(2), pp.59~92
- Yu, Ning, "The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor - A Perspective from Chinese" (1998), Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Zoltán KÖVECSES, "Metaphor and Culture", Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 2 (2010)
- Zoltán KÖVECSES, "The Power(And Problem) Of Money", Society and Economy, 40, pp.2018~ (2018)