본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effects on English Listening Abilities via Dictogloss

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The present study aims to examine the effects of dictogloss on English listening abilities. For the study, the research was implemented for fourteen weeks with eighty Korean university students. Out of these students, forty-two took listening classes using dictogloss as an experimental group and thirty-eight took listening classes traditionally as a control group. To examine the students’ listening comprehension, a simulated TOEIC LC was used. Results of the study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between both groups in the TOEIC LC although the experimental group received a higher score than the control group. A detailed explanation of the results of each TOEIC part indicates that the experimental group showed more improvement than the control group in part 4 that consists of longer texts than the other parts. The result of part 4 showed statistically significant difference between both groups. This suggests that listening learning using dictogloss can be effective in improving students’ listening comprehension. Moreover, the experimental group used the listening strategy more frequently than the control group, which revealed a significant difference. Especially, meta-cognitive strategy use made a significant difference between the two groups. The results indicate that dictogloss procedures help students facilitate their listening strategies usage. These findings indicate that listening classes using dictogloss have positive effects on listening abilities. Based on this study, some guidelines for effective listening classes were suggested.

Abstract

The present study aims to examine the effects of dictogloss on English listening abilities. For the study, the research was implemented for fourteen weeks with eighty Korean university students. Out of these students, forty-two took listening classes using dictogloss as an experimental group and thirty-eight took listening classes traditionally as a control group. To examine the students’ listening comprehension, a simulated TOEIC LC was used. Results of the study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between both groups in the TOEIC LC although the experimental group received a higher score than the control group. A detailed explanation of the results of each TOEIC part indicates that the experimental group showed more improvement than the control group in part 4 that consists of longer texts than the other parts. The result of part 4 showed statistically significant difference between both groups. This suggests that listening learning using dictogloss can be effective in improving students’ listening comprehension. Moreover, the experimental group used the listening strategy more frequently than the control group, which revealed a significant difference. Especially, meta-cognitive strategy use made a significant difference between the two groups. The results indicate that dictogloss procedures help students facilitate their listening strategies usage. These findings indicate that listening classes using dictogloss have positive effects on listening abilities. Based on this study, some guidelines for effective listening classes were suggested.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 배대권, "EFL 초급학습자를 위한 딕토글로스 기법의 적용이 영어 듣기능력과 학습전략에 미치는 효과", 중등영어교육, 5(2), pp.120~144 (2012), 한국중등영어교육학회
  2. Chung, Hye-Jin, "A study of listening strategy use and listening ability improvement for Korean learners of English", 박사, pp.2001
  3. Ellis, R., "Task-based language learning and teaching" (2003), Oxford University Press
  4. Feyten, C., "The power of listening ability: an overlooked dimension in language acquisition", The Modern Language Journal, 75(2), pp.173~180 (1991)
  5. Gardner, H., "Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century" (1999), Basic Books
  6. Garrett, K. J., "Cooperative learning in social work research courses: Helping students help one another", Journal of Social Work Education, 34, pp.237~246 (1998)
  7. Grove, C., "Focusing on form in the communicative classroom : An outputcentered model of instruction for oral skills development", Hispania, 82, pp.817~829 (1999)
  8. Izumi, S., "Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis : An experimental study on ESL relativization", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, pp.541~577 (2002)
  9. Izumi, S., "Comprehension and production processes in second language learning : In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis", Applied Linguistics, 24(2), pp.168~196 (2003)
  10. Izumi, S., "Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition?", TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), pp.239~278 (2000)
  11. Johnson, D. W., "What makes cooperative learning work, In Cooperative Learning", pp.23~36 (1999), JALT Applied Materials
  12. Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis, "Johnson, D. W.", Cooperative Learning Center, ~ (2000)
  13. 강동호, "The Role of Dictogloss on Both Listening and Grammar", 영어교육연구, 21(1), pp.1~23 (2009), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  14. 김연희, "딕토글로스 학습법을 통한 공과대학생의 영어능력 향상에 관한 연구", 공학교육연구, 12(1), pp.24~30 (2009), 한국공학교육학회
  15. Kowal, M., "From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the immersion classroom?, In Immersion education: International Perspectives", pp.284~309 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  16. "An analysis of students’ dyadic interaction on a dictogloss task" (2001)[URL]
  17. Mackey, A., "Introduction", Studies in Second Language Acqusition, 28, pp.169~178 (2006)
  18. Malmqvist, A., "How does group discussion in reconstruction tasks affect written language output?", Language Awareness, 14(2-3), pp.128~141 (2005)
  19. 오영호, "협동학습을 통한 Dictogloss 기법의 영어 쓰기학습 효과", 현대영어교육, 12(4), pp.237~257 (2011), 현대영어교육학회
  20. Ohta, A. S., "Second language processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese" (2001), Erlbaum
  21. Oxford, R. L., "Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know" (1990), Heinle & Heinle
  22. Potthast, M. J., "Outcomes of using small-group cooperative learning experience in introductory statistics courses", College Student Journal, 33, pp.34~42 (1999)
  23. Ravenscroft, S. P., "In support of cooperative learning", Accounting Education, 12, pp.187~190 (1997)
  24. Rivera, D. P., "Using cooperative learning to teach mathematics to students with learning disabilities", Forum, 21, pp.29~33 (1996)
  25. Storch, N., "A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative reconstruction task", ELT Journal, 52(4), pp.291~300 (1998)
  26. 선명진, "영어 듣기능력 향상을 위한 딕토글로스(dictogloss)", 언어학 연구, 20(20), pp.111~128 (2011), 한국중원언어학회
  27. Swain, M., "The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough", Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, pp.158~164 (1993)
  28. Swain, M., "Three functions of output in second language learning, In Principle and practice in applied linguistics", pp.125~144 (1995), Oxford University Press
  29. Swain, M., "Focus on form through conscious reflection, In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.64~81 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  30. Swain, M., "Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate : A step towards second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 16(3), pp.371~391 (1995)
  31. Vasiljevic, Z., "Dictogloss as an interactive method of teaching listening comprehension to L2 learners", English Language Teaching, 3(1), pp.41~52 (2010)
  32. Wajnryb, R., "Grammar dictation" (1990), Oxford University Press
  33. Wilson, M., "Discovery listening – improving perceptual processing", ELT Journal, 57(4), pp.335~343 (2003)
  34. Willis, J., "Challenge and change in language teaching" (1996), Heinemann

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)