본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effects of Different Tasks on English Language Learners’ Speaking Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study investigated the effects of different task types on the speaking complexity,accuracy, and fluency of Korean university students who were learning English. Seventy students taking a course in English pronunciation were asked to record andupload their verbal answers to various task prompts. The chosen task types wereargumentative, descriptive, and narrative, and the researcher divided the task types into these three groups based on the characteristics of each task type. Topic familiarity was controlled as an intervening variable. The results of analysis showed that thedescriptive task was influential on the level of learners’ accuracy. The argumentativetask was influential on the learners’ fluency and complexity in speaking performance. The results suggest that different task types may influence learners’ speakingperformance, so teachers should be keen at choosing appropriate types of tasks for aparticular teaching purpose. To check accuracy in speech production for universitylevel EFL learners, teachers can use descriptive tasks. To measure speech complexity and fluency, argumentative tasks can be employed.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different task types on the speaking complexity,accuracy, and fluency of Korean university students who were learning English. Seventy students taking a course in English pronunciation were asked to record andupload their verbal answers to various task prompts. The chosen task types wereargumentative, descriptive, and narrative, and the researcher divided the task types into these three groups based on the characteristics of each task type. Topic familiarity was controlled as an intervening variable. The results of analysis showed that thedescriptive task was influential on the level of learners’ accuracy. The argumentativetask was influential on the learners’ fluency and complexity in speaking performance. The results suggest that different task types may influence learners’ speakingperformance, so teachers should be keen at choosing appropriate types of tasks for aparticular teaching purpose. To check accuracy in speech production for universitylevel EFL learners, teachers can use descriptive tasks. To measure speech complexity and fluency, argumentative tasks can be employed.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Bonk, W. J., "A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task", Language Testing, 20(1), pp.89~110 (2003)
  2. Brown, H., "Language assessment : Principles and classroom practices" (2004), Pearson Education
  3. Brown, R., "Group work, task difference, and second language acquisition", Applied Linguistics, 12(1), pp.1~12 (1991)
  4. Brumfit, C. J., "Communicative methodology in language teaching" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  5. Bygate, M., "Challenge and change in language teaching", pp.36~46 (1996), Heinemann
  6. Bygate, M., "Introduction", Language Teaching Research, 4(3), pp.185~192 (2000)
  7. Cho, Byung Eun., "Issues concerning Korean learners of English : English education in Korea and some common difficulties of Korean students", The East Asian Learner, 1(2), pp.31~36 (2004)
  8. Crookes, G., "Planning and interlanguage variation", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(04), pp.367~383 (1989)
  9. Cunningsworth, A., "Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials" (1984), Heinemann
  10. De Jong, N., "Fluency training in the ESL classroom : An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization", Language and Cognition, 28(1), pp.7~21 (2011)
  11. Doughty, C., "Information gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition?", TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), pp.305~325 (1986)
  12. Duff, P. A., "Talking to learn", pp.147~181 (1986), Newbury House
  13. Ellis, R., "Task-based language learning and teaching" (2003), Oxford University Press
  14. Ellis, R., "The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production", Applied Linguistics, 30(4), pp.474~509 (2009)
  15. Ellis, R., "Analyzing learner language" (2005), Oxford University Press
  16. Foster, P., "The influence of planning and task type on second language performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(03), pp.299~323 (1996)
  17. Foster, P., "Measuring spoken language : A unit for all reasons", Applied Linguistics, 21(3), pp.354~375 (2000)
  18. Fotos, S., "Communicating about grammar : A task-based approach", TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), pp.605~628 (1991)
  19. Fulcher, G., "Testing tasks : Issues in task design and the group oral", Language Testing, 13(1), pp.23~51 (1996)
  20. Hunt, K. W., "Recent measures in syntactic development", Elementary English, 43(7), pp.732~739 (1966)
  21. Lynch, T., "Questioning roles in the classroom", ELT Journal, 45(3), pp.201~210 (1991)
  22. Norris, J. M., "Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity", Applied Linguistics, 30(4), pp.555~578 (2009)
  23. Nunan, D., "Designing tasks for the communicative classroom" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  24. Nunan, D., "Expressions" (2001), Heinle & Heinle
  25. Ortega, L., "Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(01), pp.109~148 (1999)
  26. Pattison, P., "Developing communication skills" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  27. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production : Exploring interactions in a componential framework", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.27~57 (2001)
  28. Samuda, V., "Tasks in second language learning" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  29. Second language acquisition strategies and task-based learning, "Skehan, P.", Thames Valley University, 178~208, pp.Working Papers in English Language Teaching, 1 (1992)
  30. Skehan, P., "A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction", Applied Linguistics, 17(1), pp.38~62 (1996)
  31. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  32. Skehan, P., "Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing", pp.167~185 (2001), Pearson Education Limited
  33. Skehan, P., "Modelling second language performance : Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis", Applied Linguistics, 30(4), pp.510~532 (2009)
  34. Skehan, P., "Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance", Language Teaching Research, 1(3), pp.185~211 (1997)
  35. Skeierso, A., "Teaching English as a second or foreign language", pp.432~453 (1991), Heinle & Heinle
  36. Tavakoli, P., "Task design and second language performance : The effect of narrative type on learner output", Language Learning, 61, pp.37~72 (2011)
  37. Thornbury, S., "How to teach speaking" (2005), Pearson Longman
  38. Ur, P., "Discussions that work : Task-centred fluency practice" (1982), Cambridge University Press
  39. Vercellotti, M. L., "Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as properties of language performance: The development of the multiple subsystems over time and in relation to each other", 박사, pp.2012
  40. Wendel, J., "Planning and second language narrative production", 박사, pp.1997
  41. White, R., "The ELT curriculum : Design, innovation and management" (1988), Blackwell
  42. Wigglesworth, G., "An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse", Language Testing, 14(1), pp.85~106 (1997)
  43. Willis, J., "A framework for task-based learning" (1996), Addison Wesley Longman
  44. Yule, G., "Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction : the effect of proficiency and interactive role", Language learning, 40(4), pp.539~556 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)