본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effects of Planning Time and the Number of Elements on EFL Learners’ Speaking Performance

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

According to Robinson’s Triadic Componential Framework, task complexity isaffected by resource-directing factors and resource-dispersing factors, which areclaimed to have differential effects on L2 learners’ task performance. In order to testthis claim, this study investigated Korean middle school students’ English speakingperformance on a giving-direction task whose complexity was manipulated in terms of[±few elements] (i.e., a resource-directing variable) and [±planning time] (i.e., aresource-dispersing variable). A total of 30 second grade middle school students weredivided into three groups and each group performed one of the following three tasks:[+few elements, +planning time] task, [+few elements, -planning time] task, and [-fewelements, +planning time] task. The participants’ speech output was analyzed in termsof fluency, complexity, and accuracy of English. Their retrospective perception on thetask was also examined in order to check whether it is affected by task complexity. Theresults showed that [-few elements] yielded more accurate and complex language,while [+planning time] led to more fluent language, lending support to Robinson’sclaim. It was also found that task complexity did not affect the learners’ perception onthe task. The learners in the groups presented a similar level of positive evaluation onthe task.

Abstract

According to Robinson’s Triadic Componential Framework, task complexity isaffected by resource-directing factors and resource-dispersing factors, which areclaimed to have differential effects on L2 learners’ task performance. In order to testthis claim, this study investigated Korean middle school students’ English speakingperformance on a giving-direction task whose complexity was manipulated in terms of[±few elements] (i.e., a resource-directing variable) and [±planning time] (i.e., aresource-dispersing variable). A total of 30 second grade middle school students weredivided into three groups and each group performed one of the following three tasks:[+few elements, +planning time] task, [+few elements, -planning time] task, and [-fewelements, +planning time] task. The participants’ speech output was analyzed in termsof fluency, complexity, and accuracy of English. Their retrospective perception on thetask was also examined in order to check whether it is affected by task complexity. Theresults showed that [-few elements] yielded more accurate and complex language,while [+planning time] led to more fluent language, lending support to Robinson’sclaim. It was also found that task complexity did not affect the learners’ perception onthe task. The learners in the groups presented a similar level of positive evaluation onthe task.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Brindley, G., "Guidelines for the development of curriculum resources", pp.34~56 (1987), National Curriculum Resource Center
  2. Brown, J. D., "An investigation of second language task-based performance assessment" (1984), University of Hawaii Press
  3. Chun, Eunsil, "Effects of Text Types and Tasks on Korean College Students' Reading Comprehension", 영어교육, 59(2), pp.75~100 (2004), 한국영어교육학회
  4. Crookes, G., "Planning and interlanguage variation", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), pp.367~383 (1989)
  5. Ellis, R., "Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse : Style shifting in the use of the past tense", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(1), pp.1~19 (1987)
  6. Ellis, R., "Analysing learner language" (2009), Oxford University Press
  7. Foster, P., "The influence of planning and task type on second language performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), pp.299~323 (1996)
  8. 김미혜, "The Effects of Different Tasks on English Language Learners’ Speaking Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency", 현대영어교육, 15(4), pp.99~116 (2014), 현대영어교육학회
  9. Kim, You Jin., "The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction", System, 37(2), pp.254~268 (2009)
  10. 김용석, "The Effect of Cognitive Task Complexity on a Language Learner’s Written Performance with Respect to Accuracy, Complexity, and Fluency", 응용언어학, 27(2), pp.285~313 (2011), 한국응용언어학회
  11. 이혜문, "The Effects of Planning Time on the Second Language Performance in a Narrative Task", 영어교육, 62(1), pp.105~120 (2007), 한국영어교육학회
  12. Long, M., "Encyclopedia of language teaching", pp.297~603 (2000), Routledge
  13. Mehnert, U., "The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), pp.83~108 (1998)
  14. Michel M., "The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2", IRLA, 45(3), pp.241~259 (2007)
  15. 오미영, "(The)Effect of task variables on adult ESL learners' production : language complexity and accuracy", 석사, 영어학, pp.2009
  16. 오미영, "The Effects of Task Complexity and Task Condition on Learner Language", 응용언어학, 28(4), pp.39~71 (2012), 한국응용언어학회
  17. Ortega, L., "Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), pp.109~148 (1999)
  18. 박정현, "Effects of within-task planning conditions on Korean EFL test-takers' performance on argumentative writing assessment tasks", 석사, 영어영문학과 어학전공, pp.2013
  19. 박수정, "What Do Learners Do While Planning? Learners’ Use and Perceptions of Planning for an Oral Narrative Task", 영어어문교육, 15(3), pp.223~248 (2009), 한국영어어문교육학회
  20. Prabhu, N., "Second language pedagogy." (1987), Oxford University Press
  21. Robinson, P., "Task complexity and second language narrative discourse", Language Learning, 45(1), pp.99~140 (1995)
  22. Robinson, P., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.287~318 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  23. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, task difficulty and task production : Exploring interactions in a componential framework", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.27~57 (2001)
  24. Robinson, P., "The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning", Second Language Studies, 21(2), pp.45~105 (2003)
  25. Robinson, P., "Second language task complexity:Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance", pp.3~37 (2011), John Benjamins
  26. 신미경, "Effects of the Sequence of Task Complexity in Different Modalities on the Learning of the English Past Tense", 영어교육, 66(3), pp.23~46 (2011), 한국영어교육학회
  27. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  28. Skehan, P., "Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance", Language Teaching Research, 1(3), pp.299~323 (1997)
  29. Qiong Wang, "Korean Advanced EFL Learners’ Attentional Allocation during Task Planning and Its Influence on Speaking", 영어어문교육, 20(3), pp.191~210 (2014), 한국영어어문교육학회
  30. Wigglesworth, G., "An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse", Language Testing, 14(1), pp.85~106 (1997)
  31. Yuan, F., "The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologue oral production", Applied Linguistics, 24(1), pp.1~27 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)