본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Ideological Dimensions of English Language Policy in South Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

South Korea’s English language policies have addressed the acquisition of English as a foreign or additional language. This kind of language planning, known as acquisition planning, concerns how the language users will acquire the language (Cooper, 1989). Understanding language plan- ning issues provides insights into language ideologies related to English, the discursive construc- tion of English, and the assumptions about language education, namely how those in authority perceive English and manage the language behaviors of students and teachers. Specifically, this paper examines the Seventh National Curriculum, the Teaching English in English (TEE) policy, and the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education’s implementation of TEE. A discourse analysis of these policy documents uncovers the ideologies underlying this kind of acquisition planning. The analysis is also complemented by participant observations and interviews with Korean English teachers at an English-training facility to gain their perspectives on TEE and the certification process. The findings shed light on the discourses of globalization and neoliberalism that fuel the study and teaching of English, serving both the state and the public’s perceived needs. Teachers also reveal their support of the TEE policy but suspect the policy and certificate serve to support economic and political agendas rather than improved English education.

Abstract

South Korea’s English language policies have addressed the acquisition of English as a foreign or additional language. This kind of language planning, known as acquisition planning, concerns how the language users will acquire the language (Cooper, 1989). Understanding language plan- ning issues provides insights into language ideologies related to English, the discursive construc- tion of English, and the assumptions about language education, namely how those in authority perceive English and manage the language behaviors of students and teachers. Specifically, this paper examines the Seventh National Curriculum, the Teaching English in English (TEE) policy, and the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education’s implementation of TEE. A discourse analysis of these policy documents uncovers the ideologies underlying this kind of acquisition planning. The analysis is also complemented by participant observations and interviews with Korean English teachers at an English-training facility to gain their perspectives on TEE and the certification process. The findings shed light on the discourses of globalization and neoliberalism that fuel the study and teaching of English, serving both the state and the public’s perceived needs. Teachers also reveal their support of the TEE policy but suspect the policy and certificate serve to support economic and political agendas rather than improved English education.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Auerbach, E. R., "Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), pp.9~32 (1993)
  2. Block, D., "Globalization and language teaching", pp.1~10 (2002), Routledge
  3. Block, D., "Neoliberalism and applied linguistics" (2012), Routledge
  4. Bourdieu, P., "Language and symbolic power" (1991), Harvard University Press
  5. Canagarajah, A. S., "Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice", pp.13~30 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  6. 조영교, "National Discourse of EGL and English Teaching in Korea: Focusing on Education Policies and Teacher Perspectives", 현대영어교육, 15(4), pp.77~98 (2014), 현대영어교육학회
  7. Choi, Seonghee, "Teachers’ beliefs about Communicative Language Teaching and their classroom English practices", English Teaching, 55(4), pp.3~32 (2000)
  8. Choi, Soyoung Ahn, "The use of the English language in the Korean workplace: A focus on the manufacturing industries", doctoral, pp.2002
  9. Choi, Tae-Hee, "The impact of the ‘Teaching English through English’ policy on teachers and teaching in South Korea", Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(3), pp.201~220 (2015)
  10. Chung, Jeehyae, "English language education policy in Asia", pp.281~299 (2016), Springer
  11. Cook, V., "Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching", TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), pp.185~209 (1999)
  12. Cooper, R., "Language planning and social change" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  13. De Costa, P. I., "Language ideologies and standard English language policy in Singapore : Responses of a ‘designer immigrant’ student", Language Policy, 9(3), pp.217~239 (2010)
  14. Grin, F., "An introduction to language policy: Theory and method", pp.77~94 (2006), Blackwell
  15. Harvey, D., "A brief history of neoliberalism" (2005), Oxford University Press
  16. Heller, M., "Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity", Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), pp.473~492 (2003)
  17. Hornberger, N. H., "Slicing the onion ethnographically : Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice", TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), pp.509~532 (2007)
  18. 조인희, "“영어로 진행하는 영어수업(TEE)”에 대한 개념적 혼란: 설문조사 문항에 나타난 개념상 불일치를 중심으로", 현대영어교육, 12(1), pp.221~243 (2011), 현대영어교육학회
  19. Johnson, D. C., "Ethnography of language policy", Language Policy, 8(2), pp.139~159 (2009)
  20. "Native-speaker English teachers to lose more jobs" (2012)[URL]
  21. 김성애, "A Critical Reflection on the ‘Teaching English Through English’ Classes in the Korean Context", 영어교육, 57(4), pp.315~346 (2002), 한국영어교육학회
  22. Koo, Hagen, "The changing faces of inequality in South Korea in the age of globalization", Korean Studies, 31(1), pp.1~18 (2007)
  23. Kubota, R., "Globalization and language teaching", pp.13~28 (2002), Routledge
  24. Kubota, R., "Questioning linguistic instrumentalism : English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan", Linguistics and Education, 22(3), pp.248~260 (2011)
  25. Kubota, R., "Globalization and language learning in rural Japan : The role of English in the local linguistic ecology", TESOL Quarterly, 43(4), pp.593~619 (2009)
  26. Kwon, Oryang, "Korea’s English education policy changes in the 1990s : Innovations to gear the nation for the 21st century", English Teaching, 55(1), pp.47~91 (2000)
  27. Larsen-Freeman, D., "Techniques and principles in language teaching" (1986), Oxford University Press
  28. Lee, Hikyoung, "Publish(in international indexed journals)or perish : Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university", Language Policy, 12(3), pp.215~230 (2013)
  29. Macedo, D., "Hegemony of English", pp.109~143 (2003), Paradigm Publishers
  30. Ministry of Education, "The English education policies in elementary schools" (1997), Ministry of Education
  31. Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, "The local construction of a global language: Ideologies of English in South Korea" (2009), Mouton de Gruyter
  32. Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, "Naturalization of competences and the neoliberal subject: Success stories of English language learning in the Korean conservative press", Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(1), pp.22~38 (2010)
  33. Park, So Jin, "New millennium South Korea", pp.101~114 (2011), Routledge
  34. Piller, I., "Neoliberalism as language policy", Language in Society, 42(1), pp.23~44 (2013)
  35. Ramanathan, V., "Ambiguities about English: Ideologies and critical practice in vernacular-medium college classrooms in Gujarat, India", Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), pp.45~65 (2005)
  36. Ricento, T., "Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English", pp.1~24 (2000), John Benjamins
  37. Seargeant, P., "Ideologies of English in Japan : The perspective of policy and pedagogy", Language Policy, 7(2), pp.121~142 (2009)
  38. Seth, M., "Education fever" (2002), University of Hawaii Press
  39. Shim, Rosa Jinyoung, "Changing attitudes toward TEWOL in Korea", Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12(1), pp.143~158 (2002)
  40. Spada, N., "International handbook of English language teaching", pp.271~288 (2007), Springer
  41. Spolsky, B., "Language policy" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  42. Turnbull, M., "There is a role for L1 in second and foreign language teaching, but…", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4), pp.531~540 (2001)
  43. Wee, L., "Linguistic instrumentalism in Singapore", Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24(3), pp.211~224 (2003)
  44. Wortham, S., "Linguistic anthropology of education", Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, pp.37~51 (2008)
  45. "Foreign English teachers facing massive job cuts" (2011)[URL]
  46. Yim, Sungwon, "Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts", pp.37~53 (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)