본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

National Discourse of EGL and English Teaching in Korea: Focusing on Education Policies and Teacher Perspectives

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study examines the impact of English as a global language (EGL) on Englishlanguage teaching in Korea in terms of pedagogical principles and practices operating within the nation’s English education. The study first reviewed the English education policies presented in the National Education Curricula since the 6th Revision, in which communicative competence was promulgated first time in the nation’s history as the primary objective in English language teaching. Then, these discourses were assessed by 19 Korean teachers of English and native English-speaking teachers using aquestionnaire and in-depth interviews. The study shows that national discourses ofEGL impose considerable impact on the contents and methodologies in Korean English education. Communicative competence is a firmly established goal for languagepedagogy at all school levels; yet such policy objectives leave a significant gap in our understanding of the reality of classroom-based language instructions, where testoriented pedagogy and teachers’ inadequate preparedness for oral language aredominating such that implementation of communicative syllabi appears to be a distalreality. Teachers’ biggest challenge comprises students’ unequal levels of proficiencyand motivation; their assessment of teaching Korean EFL is essentially not congruentin itself suggesting a clear disjunction between policy ideals and pedagogical reality.

Abstract

This study examines the impact of English as a global language (EGL) on Englishlanguage teaching in Korea in terms of pedagogical principles and practices operating within the nation’s English education. The study first reviewed the English education policies presented in the National Education Curricula since the 6th Revision, in which communicative competence was promulgated first time in the nation’s history as the primary objective in English language teaching. Then, these discourses were assessed by 19 Korean teachers of English and native English-speaking teachers using aquestionnaire and in-depth interviews. The study shows that national discourses ofEGL impose considerable impact on the contents and methodologies in Korean English education. Communicative competence is a firmly established goal for languagepedagogy at all school levels; yet such policy objectives leave a significant gap in our understanding of the reality of classroom-based language instructions, where testoriented pedagogy and teachers’ inadequate preparedness for oral language aredominating such that implementation of communicative syllabi appears to be a distalreality. Teachers’ biggest challenge comprises students’ unequal levels of proficiencyand motivation; their assessment of teaching Korean EFL is essentially not congruentin itself suggesting a clear disjunction between policy ideals and pedagogical reality.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Block, D., "Globalization and language teaching" (2002), Routledge
  2. Bolton, K., "Where WE stands : approaches, issues, and debate in world Englishes", World Englishes, 24(1), pp.69~83 (2005)
  3. Bolton, K., "English in Asia, Asian Englishes, and the issue of proficiency", English Today 94, 24(2), pp.3~12 (2008)
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U., "Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments", pp.3~44 (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  5. Brumfit, C., "Individual freedom in language teaching : Helping learners to develop a dialect of their own" (2001), Oxford University Press
  6. Brutt-Giffler, J., "World English : A study of its development" (2002), Multilingual Matters
  7. Brutt-Griffler, J., "Globalization and applied linguistics : Post-imperial questions of identity and the construction of applied linguistics discourse", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), pp.113~118 (2005)
  8. Brutt-Griffler, J., "English in academia: Catalyst or barrier?", pp.59~72 (2008), Gunter Narr Verlag Tubingen
  9. Brutt-Griffler, J., "Language, Culture and Literacy", pp.228~242 (2010), Routledge
  10. 조영교, "The Relationship between L2 Learning Motivation and Context among Korean EFL Students", 영어교육, 67(1), pp.79~105 (2012), 한국영어교육학회
  11. Cho, Young-Gyo., "Second language motivation, the L2 self and English as an international language: A sociolinguistic investigation of Korean English learners’ discourses in texts and contexts", 박사, pp.2013
  12. 조영교, "L2 Learning Motivation and Its Relationship to Proficiency: A Causal Analysis of University Students’ EIL Discourses", 영어교육, 68(1), pp.37~68 (2013), 한국영어교육학회
  13. 조영교, "English as an International Language and Second Language Motivation: A Case Study of Korean University Students", 영어교과교육, 12(3), pp.111~134 (2013), 한국영어교과교육학회
  14. Crystal, D., "English as a global language" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  15. Graddol, D., "The future of English" (1997), the British Council
  16. Jung, Sukkyung., "Language policies in education: Critical issues", pp.245~265 (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  17. Kachru, B. B., "English in the world", pp.11~30 (1985), Cambridge University Press
  18. "History of English Education in Korea" (2008)[URL]
  19. Kim, S., "Korea’s globalization" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  20. "English fever in Korea : Impacts on the teaching of English and social issues that arise" (2006)[URL]
  21. Kramsch, C., "Appropriate pedagogy", ELT Journal, 50(3), pp.199~212 (1996)
  22. Kwon, Oryang., "Korea’s English education policy changes in the 1990s : Innovations to gear the nation for the 21st century", English Teaching, 55(1), pp.47~91 (2000)
  23. Li, D., "It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine : Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea", TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), pp.677~703 (1998)
  24. McKay, S. L., "Teaching English as an international language : Rethinking goals and approaches" (2002), Oxford University Press
  25. McKay, S. L., "Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy : Re-examining common ELT assumptions", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), pp.1~22 (2003)
  26. McKay, S. L., "International English in its sociolinguistic contexts : Towards a socially sensitive EIL pedagogy" (2008), Routledge
  27. Nunan, D., "The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific regions", TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), pp.589~613 (2003)
  28. Phillipson, R., "Linguistic Imperialism" (1992), Oxford University Press
  29. Seidlhofer, B., "Double standards : Teacher education in the expanding circle", World Englishes, 18(2), pp.233~245 (1999)
  30. Seidlhofer, B., "Understanding English as a lingua franca" (2011), Oxford University Press
  31. 성명희, "Effective Teaching Techniques in Teaching English Though English", 현대영어교육, 10(1), pp.93~113 (2009), 현대영어교육학회
  32. Shim, Rosa-Jinyoung., "English language teaching in East Asia today: Changing policies and practices", pp.241~261 (2004), Eastern Universities Press
  33. Smith, L., "Readings in English as an international language", pp.1~5 (1983), Pergamon
  34. Tollefson, J., "Planning language planning inequality : Language policy in the community" (1991), Longman
  35. Tsui, A., "Language policy, culture and identity in Asian contexts", pp.1~21 (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  36. Widdowson, H. G., "The ownership of English", TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), pp.377~389 (1994)
  37. Widdowson, H. G., "Authenticity and autonomy in ELT", ELT Journal, 50(1), pp.67~68 (1996)
  38. Yim, Sungwon., "Globalization and national identity: English language textbooks of Korea", 박사, pp.2003

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)