영어 어말 설단폐쇄음의 탈락 양상: 고빈도 단어를 중심으로
English word-final coronal stop deletion in high frequency words.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Word frequency exerts a strong influence on coronal stop deletion. In general, high frequency words undergo word-final coronal stop deletion at a higher rate than low frequency words. This deletion process is undergone in consonant cluster simplification for economy of articulation. This study aims to investigate aspects of English word-final coronal stop deletion across a word boundary in high frequency words. Data were extracted from the Buckeye Corpus of Spontaneous American English Speech depending on morphological, phonological, phonetic and sociolinguistic variations. The results showed that different phonological environments favored one type of coronal stop variations such as [t], flapping, glottaling and deletion. Deletion was most prevalent for coronal stops in C/t,d/#C environment while coronal stops frequently underwent flapping in V/t,d/#V environment. In C/t,d/#C environment adjacent identical features were prohibited (Obligatory Contour Principle). More specifically, when the preceding consonants were more similar to coronal stops, the rate of coronal stop deletion was higher. The following consonants also influenced the coronal stop deletion. The rate of deletion was higher before sonorants than before obstruents. Therefore, actual education of coronal stop deletion should be done depending on various environments and factors.
Abstract
Word frequency exerts a strong influence on coronal stop deletion. In general, high frequency words undergo word-final coronal stop deletion at a higher rate than low frequency words. This deletion process is undergone in consonant cluster simplification for economy of articulation. This study aims to investigate aspects of English word-final coronal stop deletion across a word boundary in high frequency words. Data were extracted from the Buckeye Corpus of Spontaneous American English Speech depending on morphological, phonological, phonetic and sociolinguistic variations. The results showed that different phonological environments favored one type of coronal stop variations such as [t], flapping, glottaling and deletion. Deletion was most prevalent for coronal stops in C/t,d/#C environment while coronal stops frequently underwent flapping in V/t,d/#V environment. In C/t,d/#C environment adjacent identical features were prohibited (Obligatory Contour Principle). More specifically, when the preceding consonants were more similar to coronal stops, the rate of coronal stop deletion was higher. The following consonants also influenced the coronal stop deletion. The rate of deletion was higher before sonorants than before obstruents. Therefore, actual education of coronal stop deletion should be done depending on various environments and factors.
참고문헌 (23)
- Browman, C., "Papers in laboratory phonology Ⅰ: Between the grammar and physics of speech", pp.341~376 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Bybee, J., "Usage-based models of language", pp.65~85 (2000), CSLL
- Coetzee, A., "What it means to be a loser: Non-optional candidates in optimality theory", Doctor, pp.2004
- Eddington, D., "American English has goʔ a loʔ of glottal stops : Social diffusion and linguistic motivation", American Speech, 85(3), pp.338~351 (2010)
- Eddington, D., "T-glottalization in American English", American Speech, 84(3), pp.298~314 (2009)
- Guy, G., "Locating language in time and space", pp.1~36 (1980), Academic Press
- Guy, G., "Explanation in variable phonology : An exponential model of morphological constraints", Language Variation and Change, 3(1), pp.1~22 (1991)
- Guy, G., "Inherent variability and the obligatory contour principle", Language Variation and Change, 9(2), pp.149~164 (1997)
- Herd, W., "An acoustic and perceptual analysis of", t, d, pp.flaps in American English, Journal of Phonetics[DOI]
- Jurafsky, D., "Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure", pp.229~254 (2001), John Benjamins
- Ladefoged, P., "A course in phonetics" (2006), Thomson Wadsworth
- Nue, H., "Locating language in time and space", pp.37~54 (1980), Academic Press
- Olive, J., "Acoustics of American English speech : A dynamic approach" (1993), Spriger-Verlag
- Patterson, D., "Variant frequency in American English flap production : A corpus analysis of variant frequency in flap production", Phonetica, 58(4), pp.254~275 (2001)
- Pierrehumbert, J., "Vocal fold physiology 8: Voice quality control", pp.39~60 (1995), Singular Publishing Group
- Pitt, M. A., "Buckeye corpus of conversational speech" (2007), Ohio State University
- Pitt, M. A., "Exploring the role of exposure frequency in recognizing pronunciation variants", Journal of Phonetics, 39(3), pp.304~311 (2011)
- Raymond, W., "Word-internal", t, d, Language Variation and Change, pp.2006, 18(1)[DOI]
- 신승훈, "치경비음을 선행하는 치경폐쇄음의 발화양상: 벅아이 코퍼스의 미국영어를 중심으로", 영어학, 14(2), pp.279~300 (2014), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- 신승훈, "자음 간 영어 설단폐쇄음 변이양상: 단어 경계를 중심으로", 언어과학, 25(2), pp.79~100 (2018), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- Wells, J., "Accents of English 1, 2, 3" (1982), Cambridge University Press
- Wolfram, W., "A sociolinguistic description of Detroit negro speech" (1969), Center for Applied Linguistics
- Wolfram, W., "The study of social dialects in American English" (1974), Prentice-Hall