본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Investigation Into Validity of Paraphrasing Task as a Writing Performance Test Item for EFL Learners

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Paraphrasing quality has proven to be highly associated with two major linguistic components: lexical competence and syntactic competence. Nonetheless, few attempts have been made to view the skill as a window through which learners’ interlanguage can be estimated. How learners manipulate sentence structures and vocabulary in retelling may represent their current level of language proficiency. Therefore, with an aim to verify whether paraphrasing tasks are legitimate as a writing test item to accurately identify the learners’ productive language abili- ties, a correlation study was conducted with 364 test-takers ranging from grade 7 to university freshmen. The scores the learners earned from paraphrasing tasks were compared with those obtained from self-assessments of their English abilities in the case of the secondary school students and from TOEIC in the case of the university students. Paraphrase rating scales adopted in this study were developed by school teachers, considering the range of Korean secondary students’ English proficiency. It has been revealed that paraphrasing task has the potential as a valid writing test item as proven by statistically significant correlation coefficients between two sets of scores.

Abstract

Paraphrasing quality has proven to be highly associated with two major linguistic components: lexical competence and syntactic competence. Nonetheless, few attempts have been made to view the skill as a window through which learners’ interlanguage can be estimated. How learners manipulate sentence structures and vocabulary in retelling may represent their current level of language proficiency. Therefore, with an aim to verify whether paraphrasing tasks are legitimate as a writing test item to accurately identify the learners’ productive language abili- ties, a correlation study was conducted with 364 test-takers ranging from grade 7 to university freshmen. The scores the learners earned from paraphrasing tasks were compared with those obtained from self-assessments of their English abilities in the case of the secondary school students and from TOEIC in the case of the university students. Paraphrase rating scales adopted in this study were developed by school teachers, considering the range of Korean secondary students’ English proficiency. It has been revealed that paraphrasing task has the potential as a valid writing test item as proven by statistically significant correlation coefficients between two sets of scores.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Blatchford, P., "Students’ self assessment of academic attainment : Accuracy and stability from 7 to 16 years and influence of domain and social comparison group", Educational Psychology, 17(3), pp.345~360 (1997)
  2. Chen, P. Y., "Correlation: Parametric and nonparametric measures" (2002), Sage Publications
  3. Claes, M., "Motivation toward accomplishment and the self-evaluation of performances in relation to school achievement", Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1975, pp.7(4), 397~410
  4. Connor, U., "Cross-cultural differences and perceived quality in written paraphrases of English expository prose", Applied Linguistics, 4(3), pp.259~268 (1983)
  5. Fitzgerald J. T., "A longitudinal study of self-assessment accuracy", Medical Education, 37(7), pp.645~649 (2003)
  6. 지난영, "Modes of Paraphrasing Attempted by Korean L2 Writers", 영어교육, 67(4), pp.131~178 (2012), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  7. Keck, C., "The use of paraphrase in summary writing : A comparison of L1 and L2 writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), pp.261~278 (2006)
  8. Keil, L. J., "Children’s use of social comparison standards in judging performance and their effects on self-evaluation", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(1), pp.75~91 (1990)
  9. Kwok, D. C., "The self-perception of competence by Canadian and Chinese children", Paper presented at the annual convention of the Canadian Psychological Association (1993)
  10. Laveault, D., "The study of individual differences in the utility and validity of rubrics in the learning of writing ability", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2002)
  11. McCarthy, P. M., "The components of paraphrase evlauations", Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), pp.682~690 (2009)
  12. McInnis, L., "Analyzing English L1 and L2 paraphrasing strategies through concurrent verbal report and stimulated recall protocols", master’s, pp.2009
  13. Mel’čuk, I., "Vers une Linguistique Sens-Texte, Le»con inaugurale au Collμege de France" (1997), Collμege de France
  14. Milicevic, J., "Paraphrase as a tool for achieving lexical competence in L2", Proceedings of the Symposium ‘Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Second Language Use, Learning and Teaching, pp.153~167 (2008), Royal Belgium Academy of Science and Arts
  15. Milićević, J., "Lexical functions and paraphrasing rules as a bridge between L1 and L2", Proceedings of first and second languages: Exploring the relationship in pedagogy-related contexts (2009)
  16. Mitman, A. L., "Student’s perceptions of their academic standing and classroom behavior", Elementary School Journal, 89(1), pp.55~68 (1988)
  17. Ng, J. R., "Accuracy in self-assessment : The role of ability, feedback, self-efficacy and goal orientation", Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(3), pp.39~50 (2008)
  18. Polguère, A., "Didactique du lexique:contextes, démarches, supports", pp.115~125 (2004), De Boeck
  19. Reid R., "Strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities" (2013), Guilford Publications
  20. Ross, J. A., "The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment", Practical Assessment Research &Evaluation, 11(10), pp.1~13 (2006)
  21. Ross, J. A., "Effect of self-evaluation on narrative writing", Assessing Writing, 6(1), pp.107~132 (1999)
  22. Russo, M., "Aptitude and simultaneous interpretation: a proposal for a testing methodology based on paraphrase" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing
  23. Shi, L., "Textual borrowing in second-language writing", Written Communication, 21(2), pp.171~200 (2004)
  24. Sung, Y. T., "How many heads are better than one? The reliability and validity of teenagers' self-and peer assessments", Journal of Adolescence, 33(1), pp.135~145 (2010)
  25. Sung, Y. T., "The design and application of a web-based self-and peer-assessment system", Computers and Education, 45(2), pp.187~202 (2005)
  26. Žolkovskij, A., "O semantičeskom sinteze", Problemy Kibernetiki, 19, pp.177~238 (1967)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)