본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Utilizing Disney Films in the EFL Classroom: Enhancing Students’ Critical Literacy Skills with Animation

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aimed to evaluate how English teachers can utilize Disney animation in the EFL classrooms to enhance critical literacy skills with a focus on gender and environmental issues. Pocahontas (1995) and Moana (2016) have been analyzed and compared through ecofeminist thoughts as these animation movies deal with nature at the forefront with two young women assigned the role of guarding it against destruction. Through content analysis, the two films are analyzed through the central themes of ecofeminism—criticism of male-centered thinking, women’s relationship to nature, and women’s role as nature caretakers. While both films criticize male-centered thinking and emphasize the two women’s role of advocating and protecting nature, Pocahontas’s leadership is limited by binary thinking whereas Moana grows into a leader where all elements are equal and integral. Based on the analysis, students can train their critical thinking skills to further read cultural texts critically. By incorporating eco-feminist thoughts in a critical reading of Disney’s films, students can analyze issues deconstructing dominant and dualist thinking. Disney’s abundant film-text sources can serve as valuable resources for enhancing students’ English critical literacy skills.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate how English teachers can utilize Disney animation in the EFL classrooms to enhance critical literacy skills with a focus on gender and environmental issues. Pocahontas (1995) and Moana (2016) have been analyzed and compared through ecofeminist thoughts as these animation movies deal with nature at the forefront with two young women assigned the role of guarding it against destruction. Through content analysis, the two films are analyzed through the central themes of ecofeminism—criticism of male-centered thinking, women’s relationship to nature, and women’s role as nature caretakers. While both films criticize male-centered thinking and emphasize the two women’s role of advocating and protecting nature, Pocahontas’s leadership is limited by binary thinking whereas Moana grows into a leader where all elements are equal and integral. Based on the analysis, students can train their critical thinking skills to further read cultural texts critically. By incorporating eco-feminist thoughts in a critical reading of Disney’s films, students can analyze issues deconstructing dominant and dualist thinking. Disney’s abundant film-text sources can serve as valuable resources for enhancing students’ English critical literacy skills.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. "Community Comment: Maidens of Hollywood: ‘Pocahontas’ is the pure expression of filmmakers’ fantasies about Indian women" (1995)[URL]
  2. Byun, Kiyong, "English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: Policy debates and reality", Higher Education, 62, pp.431~449 (2011)
  3. 최수정, "English as an Instructional Medium in Korean Higher Education: Focusing on the Perspectives of Professors", 영어어문교육, 18(3), pp.25~51 (2012), 한국영어어문교육학회
  4. "Walt Disney Animation Studios", 2016
  5. "Pocahontas was a mistake, and here’s why!" (2017)[URL]
  6. "Walt Disney Feature Animation", 1995
  7. Garlen, J., "Teaching with Disney" (2016), Peter Lang Publishing
  8. "Revisiting Pocahontas at 20:The movie has attracted considerable criticism, but its impact on how Disney heroines are portrayed is notable" (2015)[URL]
  9. Haraway, D., "Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective", Feminist Studies, 15(3), pp.592~593 (1988)
  10. Huh, Seonmin, "Preparing elementary readers to be critical intercultural citizens through literacy education", Language Teaching Research, 22(5), pp.532~551 (2018)
  11. Janks, H., "Literacy and power" (2010), Routledge
  12. Janks, H., "Doing critical literacy: Texts and activities for students and teachers" (2014), Routledge
  13. Jhappan, R., "Rethinking Disney: Private control, public dimensions", pp.151~177 (2005), Wesleyan UP
  14. Kang, Doo Syen, "How international students build a positive relationship with a hosting country: Examination of strategic public, message and channel of national public relations", International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, pp.201~214 (2014)
  15. Kim, Eun Gyong, "English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy", pp.53~69 (2017), Springer
  16. Kim, Eun Gyong, "Korean engineering students’ perceptions of English-medium instruction (EMI) and L1 use in EMI classes", Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 38(2), pp.130~145 (2017)
  17. Lazar, G., "Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers" (1993), Cambridge University Press
  18. Lee, Soyoung, "Gender and representation", pp.230~250 (2018), Ewha Woman’s Univ. Press
  19. Leistyna, P., "The critical pedagogy reader", pp.501~521 (2009), Routledge
  20. "Moana review" (2016)[URL]
  21. Luke, M., "Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice" (1998), Routledge
  22. "Critical literacy: Enhancing students’ comprehension of text, Scholastic, Moana 2016 behind the scenes/Voice of the islands" (2004)[URL]
  23. Murphy, P. D., "Introduction: Feminism, ecology, and the future of the humanities", Studies in the Humanities, 15(2), pp.85~89 (1988)
  24. Pavelenko, A., "Critical pedagogies and language learning", pp.53~71 (2004), Cambridge University Press
  25. Reilly, C., "Teaching with Disney", pp.51~63 (2016), Peter Lang Publishing
  26. Schiele, K., "Marketing feminism in youth media: A study of Disney and Pixar animation", Business Horizons, 63(5), pp.659~669 (2020)
  27. Shin, H., "Exploring the possibilities for EFL critical pedagogy in Korea—a two-part case study", Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 2(2), pp.113~138 (2005)
  28. 서영미, "A Case Study of Critical Reading in Action with Korean University Students in an EFL Context", 영어교육, 74(4), pp.225~248 (2019), 한국영어교육학회
  29. 서영미, "중·고등학교 영어 교과서 수정 활동 연구: 예비 영어교사의 비판적 접근법 활용 사례", 현대영어교육, 21(4), pp.58~74 (2020), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]
  30. "The making of Pocahontas" (2012)[URL]
  31. Tong, R., "Feminist thought" (2017), Westview Press
  32. Warren, K. J., "Ecofeminist philosophy" (2000), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)