본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등예비교사의 영어 교과 TPACK에 대한 중요도-실행도 분석 연구

Analyzing the importance and performance levels of pre-service elementary school teachers’ TPACK competency in teaching English

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The present study investigates pre-service elementary school teachers’ perception about the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in English education, and their self-evaluation of TPACK performance, and analyzes the priority of educational needs among seven competencies in the TPACK Framework. One hundred and twenty-five pre-service elementary school teachers including six subject education majors participated. To measure their perceptions regarding the importance and performance of seven competencies including TPACK, the two surveys−TPACK Importance Survey and TPACK Performance Survey−were administered. Survey responses were analyzed using the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method. The findings are: First, pre-service teachers’ perceived importance levels were higher than their perceived performance levels in seven competencies. Second, the IPA showed English and Korean education majors must focus on developing TPACK, maintaining the current level of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Science and computer education majors must focus on developing PCK in advance. Third, freshmen showed higher levels of importance and performance than juniors; however, according to the IPA, the priority needs for both groups are the same. The findings suggest that the TPACK development program should be adjusted to the pre-service teachers’ needs−which competencies to focus on in priority−according to their majors and grade levels.

Abstract

The present study investigates pre-service elementary school teachers’ perception about the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in English education, and their self-evaluation of TPACK performance, and analyzes the priority of educational needs among seven competencies in the TPACK Framework. One hundred and twenty-five pre-service elementary school teachers including six subject education majors participated. To measure their perceptions regarding the importance and performance of seven competencies including TPACK, the two surveys−TPACK Importance Survey and TPACK Performance Survey−were administered. Survey responses were analyzed using the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method. The findings are: First, pre-service teachers’ perceived importance levels were higher than their perceived performance levels in seven competencies. Second, the IPA showed English and Korean education majors must focus on developing TPACK, maintaining the current level of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Science and computer education majors must focus on developing PCK in advance. Third, freshmen showed higher levels of importance and performance than juniors; however, according to the IPA, the priority needs for both groups are the same. The findings suggest that the TPACK development program should be adjusted to the pre-service teachers’ needs−which competencies to focus on in priority−according to their majors and grade levels.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Pratiwi Amelia, "Investigating the Development of Teachers’ TPACK and the Adoption of Digital Storytelling: A Case Study of Teaching English in Elementary School", Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), pp.701~710 (2021), 아시아테플
  2. 최경식, "예비교사의 TPACK 역량 측정 설문과 수행평가 결과의 차이", 한국과학교육학회지, 40(4), pp.437~449 (2020), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  3. Cochran, K. F., "Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation", Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), pp.263~272 (1993)
  4. Cochran, K. F., "Pedagogical content knowledge:Teachers’ integration of subject matter, pedagogy, students, and learning environments", Research Matters to the Science Teacher, 14, pp.97~102 (1997)
  5. Day, R. R., "The knowledge base in ESL", EFL teacher education, 1992, ~
  6. "Common European principles for teacher competences and qualifications" (2005)[URL]
  7. "21st century skills: How can you prepare students for the new global economy?" (2008)[URL]
  8. Freeman, D., "Second language teacher education", pp.77~90 (2009), Cambridge University Press
  9. 지향은, "Understanding of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in South Korea: Does Experience Make a Difference?", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 23(3), pp.45~67 (2020), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  10. Digital education policy, environment, and competency 2019, "KERIS", ~, pp.RM 2019-12 (2019)
  11. 김현진, "초등예비교사의 영어 수업 실연 성찰에 대한 분석 연구", 현대영어교육, 20(1), pp.1~13 (2019), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]
  12. Kim, Hyun Jin, "Importance-performance analysis of pre-service elementary school teachers’ TPACK in English education", Paper presented at the 2022MEESO International Conference (2022)
  13. 김신혜, "코로나 19 상황의 온라인 교양영어 수업에 대한 한국인과 원어민 교원의 인식 및 적응 과정", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 22(12), pp.459~479 (2022), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  14. 김영미, "Pre-Service English Teachers’ Mobile Information and Communication Technology-Technological Pedagogy and Content Knowledge", Foreign Languages Education, 25(1), pp.1~25 (2018), 한국외국어교육학회[DOI]
  15. Koehler, M. J., "The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators", pp.3~29 (2008), Lawrence Erlbaum
  16. 권선희, "영어교사 교실의사소통능력 진단도와 영어사용정도 분석 연구", 언어과학, 19(1), pp.1~25 (2012), 한국언어과학회
  17. "Research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge:A bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020" (2022)[URL]
  18. 이우주, "영어과 PCK 연구동향 분석", Foreign Languages Education, 27(2), pp.141~168 (2020), 한국외국어교육학회[DOI]
  19. Liddicoat, A, "A review of the literature: Professional knowledge and standards for language teaching", Babel, 40(3), pp.7~22 (2006)
  20. 2015 Revised national curriculum, "Ministry of Education", ~ (2015)
  21. "2022 revised curriculum:Draft principles" (2021)[URL]
  22. 2009 Revised national curriculum, "Ministry of Education, Science & Technology", ~ (2009)
  23. Mishra, P., "Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge", Teachers College Record, 108(6), pp.1017~1054 (2006)
  24. 오한나, "포스트 코로나를 위한 영어교사 테크놀로지 지식의 형성과 역할에 관한 연구", 영어교과교육, 20(1), pp.115~136 (2021), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  25. "Partnership for 21st century skills: Core content integration" (2007)[URL]
  26. "Survey of preservice teachers'knowledge of teaching and technology" (2009)[URL]
  27. In-depth analysis on the results of ICILS 2018 and preparations for ICILS 2023, "Seo, Minhee", KICE, ~, pp.RRE 2021-6 (2021)
  28. Shulman, L. S., "Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching", Educational Researcher, 15(2), pp.4~14 (1986)
  29. Shulman, L. S., "Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform", Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), pp.1~22 (1987)
  30. Tan, O., "Teacher education in the 21st century: Singapore’s evolution and innovation" (2017), Springer
  31. Toledo-Figueroa, D, "Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession", pp.73~98 (2017), Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD
  32. 임수연, "IPA 기법을 활용한 영어교사 역량의중요도와 실행도 분석", 영어교과교육, 20(4), pp.187~210 (2021), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)