본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

예비교사의 TPACK 평가틀 개발과 TPACK 발달 저해 요인 분석

Development of Pre-Service Teachers’ TPACK Evaluation Framework and Analysis of Hindrance Factors of TPACK Development

백성혜|최경식
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2021.08|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제41권 제4호|pp. 325-338

1

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

예비교사Evaluation frameworkPre-service teachers저해 요인평가틀TPACK 발달TPACK developmentHindrance factors
주제분류교육학

초록

이 연구는 한 교사 양성대학에서 40명의 예비교사를 대상으로 TPACK 발달을 위한 15주 교육프로그램을 개발하고, 예비교사의 TPACK의 실천적 역량을 평가하기 위한 TPACK 발달 평가틀을 개발 하였다. 개발된 TPACK(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) 발달 평가틀은 TPK(Technological Pedagogical Knowledge), TCK(Technological Content Knowledge), TPACK이 각각 0단계부터 4단계까지 5단계로 구성되었다. 이를 토대로 예비교사의 TPK, TCK, TPACK 수준을 평가한 결과, 대부분의 예비교사의 TPK, TCK, TPACK 수준은 일치하였으나, 일부 예비교사의 경우 TPK와 TCK가 일치하지 않았다. 이때 TPACK 수준은 TPK와 TCK 가운데 낮은 수준을 따르는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 TPACK 수준이 낮은 예비교사가 갖고 있는 TPACK 발달 저해요인을 조사한 결과, 학생의 자율적 학습 능력에 대한 불신, 학생의 상호작용 역량에 대한 불신, 학교 현장의 현실적 제약에 대한 인식 등이 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 실천적인 TPACK 발달을 위해서는 예비교사에게 균형잡힌 TPK와 TCK의 발달을 돕고, 예비교사가 갖고 있는 TPACK 발달 저해요인을 제거하는 교육 프로그램을 제공할 필요가 있다고 주장하였다.

Abstract

In this study, we developed a 15-week educational program for TPACK(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) development of 40 pre-service teachers in a university for teacher training. We also developed a TPACK evaluation framework to evaluate the practical competency of TPACK of pre-service teachers. The developed evaluation framework consisted of 5 levels, from 0 to 4, TPK(Technological Pedagogical Knowledge), TCK(Technological Content Knowledge), and TPACK, respectively. As a result of the evlauation, the levels of TPK, TCK, and TPACK development stages of most pre-service teachers were consistent, but some pre-service teachers’ TPK and TCK did not match. It was found that the TPACK stages follow the lower level between TPK and TCK. In addition, as a result of an investigation into the hindrance factors of the TPACK development of pre-service teachers with low TPACK stages in the use of technology, they have distrust of students’ ability to learn with self-regulation, distrust of students’ ability to interact, and recognition of practical limitations in the school field. Based on these findings, we argued that it was necessary to provide an educational program to help pre-service teachers develop balanced TPK and TCK and eliminate the hindrance factors of the TPACK development of pre-service teachers about technology-using classes.

참고문헌 (107)

  1. Abbitt, J. T., "Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education : A review of current methods and instruments", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), pp.281~300 (2011)
  2. Allsopp, M., "The technology integration matrix: The development of field-test of an Internet based multimedia assessment tool for the implementation of instructional technology in the classroom", Proceeding of Florida Educational Research Association 2007 Conference (2007)
  3. Anderson, R. M., "How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic", The Lancet, 395(10228), pp.931~934 (2020)
  4. Angeli, C., "Transforming a teacher education method course through technology : Effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency", Computers & Education, 45(4), pp.383~398 (2005)
  5. Angeli, C., "Preservice teachers as ICT designers : An instructional design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge", Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 21(4), pp.292~302 (2005)
  6. Angeli, C., "Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK : Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPCK)", Computers & Education, 52(1), pp.154~168 (2009)
  7. Archambault, L., "Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators" (2016), Routledge
  8. Archambault, L., "Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge : Exploring the TPACK framework", Computers & Education, 55(4), pp.1656~1662 (2010)
  9. Baxter J. A., "Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 6", pp.147~161 (1999), Springer
  10. Booker, S., "The evolution of pre-service teachers TPACK after completing an undergraduate technology integration course", Doctor, pp.2017
  11. Borg, M., "The apprenticeship of observation", ELT Journal, 58(3), pp.274~276 (2004)
  12. Brush, T., "Strategies for preparing preservice social studies teachers to effectively integrate technology : Models and practices", Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), pp.46~59 (2009)
  13. Chai, C. S., "The relationships among Singaporean preservice teachers’ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT", The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), pp.387~400 (2010)
  14. Chai, C. S., "Singaporean and Taiwanese pre-service teachers’ beliefs and their attitude towards ICT use : A comparative study", The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), pp.117~128 (2009)
  15. Chai, C. S., "Changing teachers’ TPACK and design beliefs through the Scaffolded TPACK Lesson Design Model(STLDM)", Learning : Research and Practice, 3(2), pp.114~129 (2017)
  16. Chai, C. S., "Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators" (2016), Routledge
  17. Chai, C. S., "Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK)for meaningful learning with information and communication technology(ICT)", Computers &Education, 57(1), pp.1184~1193 (2011)
  18. 최은선, "프로그래밍 기반 수업이 과학교사의 TPACK에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(4), pp.693~703 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  19. 최경식, "예비교사의 TPACK 역량 측정 설문과 수행평가 결과의 차이", 한국과학교육학회지, 40(4), pp.437~449 (2020), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  20. 최경식, "TPACK 발달 단계를 고려한 수업이 예비 교사의 자기효능감 및 발달 수준에 미치는 효과", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 20(22), pp.1371~1391 (2020), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  21. Cianciolo, A. T., "Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance", pp.770~792 (2018), Cambridge University Press
  22. Copur-Gencturk, Y., "A Comparison of Perceived and Observed Learning From Professional Development : Relationships Among Self-Reports, Direct Assessments, and Teacher Characteristics", Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), pp.138~151 (2021)
  23. Cox, S. M., "A Conceptual Analysis of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge", Doctor, pp.2008
  24. Cox, S. M., "Diagramming TPACK in Practice : Using an Elaborated Model of the TPACK Framework to Analyze and Depict Teacher Knowledge", TechTrends, 53(5), pp.60~69 (2009)
  25. Crompton, H., "Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge", pp.239~250 (2015), Springer US
  26. Curaoglu, O., "Proceedings of SITE 2010-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference", pp.3803~3810 (2010), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
  27. Demetriou, C., "The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology", pp.1~6 (2014)
  28. Deng, F., "The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers’ epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT", Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), pp.245~256 (2014)
  29. Duke, N. K., "Literacy research methodologies" (2011), Guilford Press
  30. Dunning, D., "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol 44", pp.247~296 (2011), Academic Press
  31. Ertmer, P. A., "Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change : Strategies for technology integration", Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), pp.47~61 (1999)
  32. Ertmer, P. A., "Teacher pedagogical beliefs : The final frontier in our quest for technology integration", Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), pp.25~39 (2005)
  33. Ertmer, P. A., "Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices : A critical relationship", Computers & Education, 59(2), pp.423~435 (2012)
  34. Ertmer, P. A., "International Handbook of Research on Teacher Beliefs", pp.403~ (2015), International Handbook of Research on Teacher Beliefs
  35. Gall, M. D., "Educational research: An introduction" (2007), Pearson Education
  36. Gilbert, J. K., "Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education (Vol. 9)" (2016), Springer International Publishing
  37. Glazer, E. M., "Factors and interactions influencing technology integration during situated professional development in an elementary school", Computers in the Schools, 26(1), pp.21~39 (2009)
  38. Graham, C. R., "Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPACK)", Computers & Education, 57(3), pp.1953~1960 (2011)
  39. Graham, C. R., "Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions : TPACK decision making", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), pp.530~546 (2012)
  40. Graham, C. R., "Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers", TechTrends, 53(5), pp.70~79 (2009)
  41. Graham, C., "Teaching and Measuring TPACK Development in Two Preservice Teacher Preparation Programs", Proceedings of SITE 2009-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp.4081~4086 (2009), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
  42. Harris, J. B., "Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric", Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp.3833~3840 (2010), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
  43. Harris, J. B., "Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2012", pp.15~22 (2012), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
  44. Harris, J. B., "Technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPACK)in action : A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), pp.211~229 (2011)
  45. Hazzan, O., "Prospective high school mathematics teachers’ attitudes toward integrating computers in their future teaching", Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 35(2), pp.213~225 (2002)
  46. Hermans, R., "The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers", Computers & Education, 51(4), pp.1499~1509 (2008)
  47. Hill, H. C., "Validating the ecological assumption: The relationship of measure scores to classroom teaching and student learning", Measurement, 5(2-3), pp.107~118 (2007)
  48. Hofer, M. J., "TPACK Research with Inservice Teachers : Where’s the TCK?", Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp.4704~4709 (2012), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
  49. Howland, J. L., "Meaningful Learning with Technology: Pearson New International Edition" (2012), Pearson Higher Ed
  50. Inan, F. A., "Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms : A path model", Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), pp.137~154 (2010)
  51. Jacobson, M. J., "Epistemology and learning : Impact on pedagogical practices and technology use in Singapore schools", Computers & Education, 55(4), pp.1694~1706 (2010)
  52. Jang, S. -J., "Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards", Computers & Education, 59(2), pp.327~338 (2012)
  53. Jen, T. -H., "Science teachers’ TPACK-Practical : Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach", Computers & Education, 95, pp.45~62 (2016)
  54. Judson, E., "How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning : Is there a connection", Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), pp.581~597 (2006)
  55. Jung, J., "Course-level modeling of preservice teacher learning of technology integration", British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), pp.555~571 (2020)
  56. Kalantzis, M., "The teacher as designer : Pedagogy in the new media age", E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), pp.200~222 (2010)
  57. 강순자, "중학교 수학교사의 테크놀로지 통합 자기효능감에 관한 연구", 수학교육, 55(4), pp.523~538 (2016), 한국수학교육학회
  58. Kaplon-Schilis, A., "Analysis of Relationship Between Five Domains of TPACK Framework: TK, PK, CK Math, CK Science, and TPACK of Pre-service Special Education Teachers", Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), pp.25~43 (2020)
  59. Kereluik, K., "Coding Pre-Service Teacher Lesson Plans for TPACK", Proceedings of SITE 2010-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp.3889~3891 (2010), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
  60. Koehler, M. J., "With a little help from your students : A new model for faculty development and online course design", Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), pp.25~55 (2004)
  61. Koehler, M. J., "Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology", Computers & Education, 49(3), pp.740~762 (2007)
  62. Koehler, M. J., "Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches", pp.16~31 (2012), IGI Global
  63. Koh, J. H. L., "A rubric for assessing teachers’ lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6) (2013)
  64. Koh, J. H. L., "New media and learning in the 21st century", pp.161~180 (2015), Springer
  65. Kruger, J., "Unskilled and unaware of it : How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), pp.1121~ (1999)
  66. Landry, G. A., "Creating and validating an instrument to measure middle school mathematics teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)", Doctor, pp.2010
  67. 이영란, "언론 기사를 통해 본 포스트 코로나 시대 교육의 방향성: 위기 속 ‘창의성 교육’의 역할", 창의력교육연구, 20(4), pp.65~85 (2020), 한국창의력교육학회[DOI]
  68. Lortie, D., "Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study" (1975), University of Chicago Press
  69. "LoTi Digital-Age Framework" (2011)[URL]
  70. Lyublinskaya, I., "Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches", pp.295~322 (2012), IGI Global
  71. Designing learning from day one:A first day activity to foster design thinking about educational technology, "Mishra, P.", Teachers College Record, ~ (2006)
  72. Mishra, P., "Technological pedagogical content knowledge : A framework for teacher knowledge", Teachers College Record, 108(6), pp.1017~1054 (2006)
  73. Mishra, P., "Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge", Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, pp.1~16 (2008)
  74. Moersch, C., "Levels of technology implementation(LoTi) : A framework for measuring classroom technology use", Learning and Leading with Technology, 23, pp.40~42 (1995)
  75. "Digital Age Best Practices: Teaching and Learning Refocused" (2011)[URL]
  76. Niess, M. L., "Knowledge needed for teaching with technologies–Call it TPACK", AMTE Connections, 17(2), pp.9~10 (2008)
  77. Niess, M. L., "Investigating TPACK : Knowledge Growth in Teaching with Technology", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), pp.299~317 (2011)
  78. Niess, M. L., "Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model", Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1) (2009)
  79. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., "Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology:Addressing professional and student needs", Computers & Education, 55(3), pp.1321~1335 (2010)
  80. Özgün-Koca, S. A., "Preservice teachers’ emerging TPACK in a technology-rich methods class", The Mathematics Educator, 19(2), pp.10~20 (2010)
  81. Palak, D., "Teachers’ Beliefs and Technology Practices : A Mixed-methods Approach", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), pp.417~441 (2009)
  82. Papanastasiou, E. C., "Can Computer Use Hurt Science Achievement? The USA Results from PISA", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, pp.325~332 (2003)
  83. Papanikolaou, K., "Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning", International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, pp.34~ (2017)
  84. Paulhus, D. L., "The self-report method", Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology, 1(2007), pp.224~239 (2007)
  85. Polanyi, M., "The tacit dimension" (1966), Doubleday
  86. Polly, D., "Examining teachers’ enactment of technological pedagogical and content knowledge(TPACK)in their mathematics teaching after technology integration professional development", Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), pp.37~59 (2011)
  87. Polly, D., "Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers’ espoused and enacted practices", The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), pp.120~130 (2011)
  88. Putnam, R. T., "What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning", Educational Researcher, 29(1), pp.4~15 (2000)
  89. Constructivist-Compatible Beliefs and Practices among U.S. Teachers. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey Report #4. (NSF-REC-9600614), "Ravitz, J. L.", Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, ~ (2000)
  90. Raza, S. A., "Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System(LMS)in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic : An Expansion of the UTAUT Model", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), pp.183~208 (2020)
  91. Roehrig, G. H., "Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), pp.883~907 (2007)
  92. Sang, G., "Student teachers’thinking processes and ICT integration : Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology", Computers &Education, 54(1), pp.103~112 (2010)
  93. Scherer, R., "The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge : Comparing structural equation modeling approaches", Computers in Human Behavior, 80, pp.67~80 (2018)
  94. Schmid, M., "Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPACK)of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans", Computers in Human Behavior, 115, pp.106586~ (2021)
  95. Schmidt, D. A., "Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK) : The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), pp.123~149 (2009)
  96. Shulman, L., "Knowledge and teaching : Foundations of the new reform", Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), pp.1~23 (1987)
  97. Speer, N. M., "Connecting beliefs and practices : A fine-grained analysis of a college mathematics teacher’s collections of beliefs and their relationship to his instructional practices", Cognition and Instruction, 26(2), pp.218~267 (2008)
  98. Stoilescu, D., "A Critical Examination of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework : Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Integrating Technology", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), pp.514~547 (2015)
  99. Suharwoto, G., "Developing and Implementing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Teaching Mathematics with Technology", Proceedings of SITE 2006-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp.3824~3828 (2006), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
  100. Valanides, N., "Preparing preservice elementary teachers to teach science through computer models", Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), pp.87~98 (2006)
  101. Valanides, N., "Learning and teaching about scientific models with a computer-modeling tool", Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), pp.220~233 (2008)
  102. Valanides, N., "Professional development for computer-enhanced learning : A case study with science teachers", Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), pp.3~12 (2008)
  103. Voogt, J., "Technological pedagogical content knowledge-a review of the literature : Technological pedagogical content", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), pp.109~121 (2012)
  104. Walen, S. B., "Pre-service teachers learning mathematics using calculators : A failure to connect current and future practice", Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(4), pp.445~462 (2003)
  105. Welsh, J., "Florida’s Technology Integration Matrix", Principal Leadership, 12(2), pp.69~71 (2011)
  106. Willermark, S., "Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge : A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), pp.315~343 (2018)
  107. Yoder, A. J., "The Relationship between Graphing Calculator Use and Teachers’ Beliefs about Learning Algebra", Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, pp.25~28 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

예비교사들의 테크놀로지 내용교수지식 변화에 관한 연구: 테크놀로지 활용 교과목을 중심으로신원석, 엄미리, 한인숙한국정보교육학회 · 정보교육학회논문지2012 · 제16권 제1호예비 교사의 테크놀로지 교수 내용 지식 향상을 위한 TPACK-P 교육 프로그램 개발김성원, 이영준한국컴퓨터정보학회 · 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지2017 · 제22권 제7호예비화학교사의 TPACK 발달을 위한 실천기반 교사교육 프로그램의 효과 및 방해 요인 분석Seoung-Hey Paik대한화학회 · 대한화학회지2022 · 제66권 제4호예비 교사의 TPACK 향상을 위한 프로그래밍 기반 TPACK 교육 프로그램 적용김성원한국컴퓨터정보학회 · 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지2020 · 제25권 제7호예비교사와 현직교사의 TPACK 교육 요구 분석 및 비교이영준, 이은경, 정재리한국컴퓨터정보학회 · 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지2025 · 제30권 제3호테크놀로지 내용교수지식(TPACK) 역량에 대한 예비교사의 인식 분석신원석, 엄미리, 한인숙한국교원교육학회 · 한국교원교육연구2011 · 제28권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

중학교 과학영재학생의 과학불안 경험에 대한 현상학적 연구강지훈pp. 283-295과학 교사 학습공동체 특성에 대한 질적 탐구 -학교안과 학교밖 공동체 사례-정은영, 이기영, 곽영순pp. 297-310CHAT을 이용한 사회문화적 관점에서 교육실습에 참여하는 예비과학교사의 수업 설계 및 실행 과정 분석노태희, 김성훈, 김민환pp. 311-324초등학교의 협력적 과학 모델링 수업에서 나타난 리더의 행위주체성 탐색엄장희, 김희백pp. 339-358
원문 보기